AI star Tilly Norwood, created by Eline Van der Velden’s Xicoia studio, is drawing major Hollywood talent agencies—reshaping the future of acting.
Meet Tilly Norwood – Hollywood’s First “Fake Real” Star introduced by Dutch comedian-producer Eline van der Velden through her AI studio Xicoia. According to Variety, Norwood “has drawn the interest of several talent agents” after being debuted at industry-targeted Zurich Film Festival summit. Van der Velden informed the Zurich Summit panel that studios – early doubters of AI actors in early 2025 – are now “moving quietly ahead with AI projects,” and that she anticipates an imminent announcement of which agency will have Norwood as their client. And lo and behold, some talent agents are already swooping around her.
Her debut? An all-AI comedy sketch called AI Commissioner — from script to performance, it was all generated. Eline even went on to state that she wishes Tilly to become “the next Scarlett Johansson or Natalie Portman.” Daring, isn’t it?
News of Norwood’s agency buzz triggered swift backlash from working actors. Hollywood stars publicly criticised on social media, asking how a computer-generated “actress” would fill the role of actual actors. The Wrap covers –
Actress Melissa Barrera (In the Heights) took to Instagram: “Hope all actors repped by the agent that does this, drop their a$. How gross, read the room.”
Others sarcastically predicted that contracting an AI “actress” would be a PR debacle at best, a catastrophe at worst. The Independent’s report included similar zingers by stars such as White Lotus’s Lukas Gage: “She was a nightmare to work with!!!!”.
Van der Velden compares AI to previous technologies such as animation or CGI – “a new brush, a new paintbrush” – that enhance storytelling without doing away with live performance. She underlines that “nothing – certainly not an AI character – can take away the craft or joy of human performance”.
Overall, some people think that it can jeopardize the real talent of real performance and their careers too but some believe that this is an experimental creative tool of Norwood.
Tilly Norwood’s appearance has fueled controversy for the classic acting roles in the future. Critics caution that if studios or agencies start dealing with AI characters as commodities, human actors may see fewer opportunities, stated by Deadline. The 2023 SAG-AFTRA agreements already contain firm safeguards (negotiated under union pressure) to avoid unapproved AI use of actors’ likenesses. Union officials have maintained that any application of a performer’s digital double needs to be affirmatively approved and paid for. On the agency front, some reps may consider an AI actor to be a publicity stunt worthy of consideration — industry speculation about an agency inking Tilly to garner press attention has been out there – but most agents are cautious.
According to Hollywood Reporter, agencies that try to sign Norwood could destroy confidence: “If your agent does this, drop their a$.” Practically speaking, even if Norwood or other AI talent land the occasional job (commercials, voiceovers, background), big stars will continue to be required for bankable leads, and productions will need to work with union rules.
In the short term, Norwood’s case has placed agencies on notice that AI is a “hot” issue – agents can softly scout for AI talent or ignore the trend, but they risk blowback either way.
The Hollywood studios seem cautiously interested in generative AI. At the Zurich panel, Van der Velden saw a change in studio mindset from skepticism (“this is nothing”) early in 2025 to interest (“we need to do something”) mid-year. Industry analysts point out that studios might view AI tools as means to reduce costs and speed content production (e.g., automating background extras, pre-visualization, or editing). Experts have indicated that AI may allow even smaller studios to “make high-end content at a fraction of the expense,” possibly expanding competition.
The Deadline reports that the web’s leading “digital influencer,” Lu do Magalhães, boasts more than 8 million fans despite being a complete computer simulation. This pairing demonstrates that although mainstream cinema audiences first refuse to accept blatant deepfakes, younger or more computer-literate audiences occasionally accept or indeed prefer artificial celebrities on the web.
As van der Velden contends, if Norwood can provide compelling performances, audiences may be more concerned about story than she is machine. But at least for now, many industry observers believe AI actresses like Tilly will remain curiosities rather than genuine replacements for popular live performers.
Tilly Norwood is only one example of AI’s growing footprint in entertainment. Industry analysts are forecasting that AI tools will become widespread in production pipelines (storyboarding, visual effects, language dubbing, etc.), though leadership in creativity will still be human-driven in the near term. Some believe AI will unleash a deluge of cheap content (offering regulation or curation), while others envision it as fueling indie innovation. What is certain is that Hollywood will incorporate AI increasingly – though cautiously.
As the case of Tilly Norwood shows, studios and tech companies might chase “AI actors” as an experiment, but mass acceptance will depend on how audiences respond and union negotiations. If Norwood is successful at finding employment and garnering eyeballs, it will inspire more AI productions; if she crashes or incites consumer hostility, the market will tap the brakes.
As Variety and others point out, the controversy surrounding Tilly Norwood illustrates broader issues of whether AI is merely “another tool” for directors or a force that might disrupt conventional acting work. The long-term direction will depend on the degree to which Hollywood harmonizes progress with art and labor considerations – and a chapter that continues to be written.
Explore Michael Buble net worth in 2026, his music income, business ventures, luxury lifestyle, career achievements, and financial success story.
Michael Buble is a Canadian songwriter and vocalist who likes to sing old standards at Christmas. But that’s not it, he also owns a $90 million diversified business empire. The asset portfolio of this international artist extends far beyond traditional recorded music and touring revenues, a highly evolved method for building and wealth preservation.
While he builds most of his worth from selling over 75 million albums and getting more than 14 billion digital streams, but different business ventures and smart investment safeguarding his net worth from ups and downs of the music industry.
That’s what kept him secure while he took years off from the spotlight to support his family. Let’s look into the Michael Buble net worth journey from start to present.
Buble was raised by his grandfather in Burnaby, British Columbia, that grandfather loved big band music and to get his grandson a spot on stage he offered free plumbing work to venue owners.
It takes Buble into traditional pop and jazz standards, he moves towards a music which was already 50 years old by the time he started singing it. And that was a genuine marketing move without even planning it to do.
Rich men, older audiences buy concert tickets at a premium price to watch live, then buy CDs to listen to repeatedly. The kind of music is unforgettable, the audience is so loyal that they were present every time for a full show.
“The holiday album alone brings in an estimated $15.9 million every single year — without him lifting a finger.”
In 2011, Bublé released his Christmas album. That record is climbing every year near christmas that it wasn’t just a song but became a cultural institution. It played everywhere on speakers and families put it on while decorating the Christmas tree.
The numbers always climb up and it crossed over 752 million streams in a recent holiday tracking period. It pushed down Mariah Carey’s entire holiday catalog, which pulled in 692 million making this single album so powerful that it earns around $15.9 million per year from streaming alone.
Just think about it, he doesn’t have to move his legs out of the door, enjoying with his kids while his album deposits millions into his account. No new campaign or music or tours, just evergreen track.
But he is not the person who just sits back and does nothing. He took only big tours, his Crazy Love Tour wrapped up grossing around $127 million across 185 shows which is around $178 million in today’s value. Next, An Evening Tour also made over $50 million.
Recently, he launched new Las Vegas residency shows which is a smart business move rather than spending on travel, food, crew hotels from city to city moving stages. Now he performs at a single place and people come to watch, saving his cost and making him more profits. A recent two-weekend run at Resorts World alone grossed $4.64 million.
He turned down NBC offers many times but after a long time he joined NBC’s The Voice as a coach in late 2024. And he won two championships, got signed up for the third. Industry estimates put his per-season salary at around $13 million.
Actually it’s quite good because there’s no tour bus, no jet lag, no soundcheck. He just has to give feedback with his charming look on a spinning chair. This earned him $13 million. His exposure encourages more audiences to listen to his music on Spotify which feeds back into the royalty machine.
The sparkling water was actually called Bubly and it is owned by PepsiCo. Michael is totally convinced that the drink is named after him and it should be pronounced as Buble. The highly successful and long-running a 2019 Super Bowl ad is a golden deal for Michael that earned him a significant amount of money.
He also launched his own whiskey brand named Fraser & Thompson, two rivers near his hometown British Columbia influenced the name. The unique blend of Canadian whisky and Kentucky bourbon, it costs around $30 a bottle which is expensive. The global whiskey market is worth $92 billion and growing fast. Even a small amount of that costs a lot. If the brands get supported by a major spirits company then the outcome would be enormous.
He also made fragrances which are affordable for his fans and sold across 30 international markets. He chose volume over exclusivity, not making a luxury niche perfume.
Read Also: Young Actress Zendaya Net Worth
Buble owns 100,000 square feet of land in Burnaby which is currently assessed at $26.3 million. It is a fully built and well-structured home with seven bedrooms, 15 bathrooms, a swimming pool, tennis court and exclusive underground hockey rink.
He also owns other properties in different places like West Hollywood (listed at $6.1 million) and Buenos Aires.
“Performing at the 2026 FIFA World Cup opening ceremony will put Bublé in front of a larger global audience than a Super Bowl halftime show.”
The world cup is watched by billions of people and this is an extraordinary exposure of Michael Buble. He will headline the opening ceremony of the FIFA World Cup in Toronto in June 2026. Alanis Morissette and Alessia Cara also joined him but he is the headliner, performing before Canada’s first-ever group stage match.
His music will scale up on the top soon after this single performance which can trigger a massive spike on all platforms. In Q3 and Q4 2026, we will surely count again his net worth increasing.
Read Also: Who is Lady Gaga and what is her net worth?
The honest answer is that Bublé made his fortune by excelling at a handful of things. He discovered an underserved audience and appealed to them with total sincerity. He made a holiday album that unexpectedly went evergreen. He branched out before he needed to — into TV, into spirits, into fragrance, into real estate — so that when touring slowed down in the pandemic or during his son’s illness, the money didn’t.
He isn’t the flashiest name in music, chasing trends, or being in controversies. He’s just a guy from Burnaby who likes old songs and who has quietly, methodically constructed one of the most durable financial portfolios in the entertainment world. At $90 million and rising, that’s a game plan worth watching.
Michael Buble Net Worth is built on a diversified source which extends more widely with time. Possessing an estimated and verifiable net worth of $90 million isn’t just a one day struggle. He built it step-by-step with seasonal holiday songs which alone generate $15.9 million every year, NBC The Voice coach worth around $13 million, Super Bowl Campaign collaboration with PepsiCo brand, his Fraser & Thompson whiskey brand in a rapidly expanding $92 billion global spirits market and $26.3 million primary estate in British Columbia that serves as an intergenerational store of value.
He isn’t stopping at this point, now the biggest achievement will be ahead. The 2026 FIFA World Cup prepared to exponentially increase his media footprint while being the headliner with his wonderful performance.
Deep dive into the world of entertainment with Fandomfans and get latest updates and focused details from movies, series, and celebrities.
See the complete Critics Choice Awards 2026 winners list. Timothée Chalamet, Jessie Buckley, Jacob Elordi & top film and TV performances honored.
If you caught the 31st Annual Critics Choice Awards 2026 on January 4, you saw that the atmosphere at the Barker Hangar was not just about bright lights and glamour. For the fourth year in a row, the night was hosted by Chelsea Handler and it seemed less like a celebratory back slap and more like a nod to hard work.
Whether it was 12-hour makeup sessions or five-minute television episodes, the winners this year didn’t only act, they suffered. The message from the Critics Choice Association (CCA) was loud and clear: in 2026, the line between technical risk and extraordinary physical commitment is where the industry’s attention lies.
(Best Actor Winner)
The weepy Timothée Chalamet as Brooding Heartthrob, Desert Messiah in Dune is not who Marty Supreme is at all, he’s fully reimagined himself. Chalamet Won Best Actor for portraying a 1950s ping-pong wunderkind based on the real life Marty Reisman.
But this was about more than whacking a ball back and forth. He was described as having a “singularly enervating intensity”. Marty was not a sportsman, but a hustler—a guy who could talk some unbeatable nonsense, who could pair swagger with geeky glasses, and who was so engulfed in his need to win that he was willing to try anything. It was a kinetic, fizzy, electrified turn, the kind that reassures you he can fill a film with their souls alone, and in pure physical comedy.
(Best Actress Winner)
If Chalamet delivered the energy, Jessie Buckley delivered the tears. Taking home Best Actress for her portrayal of Agnes (Shakespeare’s wife) in Hamnet, Buckley gave what could be the most gut-wrenching performance of the year.
The storyline deals with the loss of her child, Hamnet, and the sorrows that led to Hamlet. Buckley’s performance was said to be “a privilege to watch.” She never merely portrayed a historical figure; she captured the raw, earth-shattering agony of a mother fighting to keep her life intact. It was a quiet, powerful turn that stood out against flashier roles, proving that sometimes the loudest emotions are the ones spoken in whispers.
(Best Supporting Actor Winner)
Jacob Elordi is now officially more than just a teen heartthrob. Awarded Best Supporting Actor for Guillermo del Toro’s Frankenstein, Elordi achieved the impossible: he brought us to tears over a monster.1 His role wasn’t about scary make-up or snarling. He reputedly studied Butoh (a Japanese “dance of darkness”) in order to capture the creature’s motions, make such a physicality that was at once a terrifying and sincerely moving figure.
He portrayed the Monster not as a villain, but as an acting soul imprisoned in a grotesque body, one who was turned away from by his maker. It was a “physical” act- ing, in the widest sense — using his back, his shoulders and his eyes as well as his voice.
(Best Supporting Actress Winner)
The lack of appreciation for horror at awards shows makes Amy Madigan’s victory for Best Supporting Actress all the more gratifying. In the surprise hit Weapons as Aunt Gladys, a figure who immediately became a horror icon.
Madigan, a 75-year-old seasoned actress, said she was astonished by the win, she thought people would just “dig” the movie – not fall in love with “terrifying” her character. She teetered between a kooky, eccentric senior citizen and a predatory natural force. To be the most frightening person at the party and be so hypnotically watchable is a rare achievement, and the reviews strongly confirmed that.
We may as well not speak of winners without mentioning the night’s biggest—err, biggest champion? Paul Thomas Anderson won both Best Picture and Best Director for One Battle After Another.
The film is densely plotted, an “exquisitely detailed fantasy” about former revolutionaries meeting to rescue a daughter. It’s political and personal and very, very complex – and well, that’s just what the critics called the masterpiece of resistance and hope. I mean it’s not just the one actor here, it’s a conductor (Anderson) behind the wheel of an orchestra of stellar performers (including Leonardo DiCaprio and Teyana Taylor) who create the best film of the year.
Read More 👉 Five Nights at Freddy 2 Is All About What Survival Takes From You
| Category | Winner | Show | Key Context |
| Best Drama | The Pitt | HBO Max | Medical realism meets pandemic trauma. |
| Best Actor | Noah Wyle | The Pitt | A return to form with “urgent” authenticity. |
| Best Actress | Rhea Seehorn | Pluribus | Sci-Fi nuance; playing a resistor in a hive-mind. |
| Best Limited Series | Adolescence | Netflix | A technical feat of one-shot storytelling. |
Perhaps the most heartening bit from the 31st Critics Choice Awards is that “Genre isn’t a slur anymore. ”Horror and Sci-Fi, two genres long neglected at awards time, dominated the discussion.
The 2026 ceremony wasn’t about the speeches (though Noah Wyle’s tribute to healthcare workers was a tear-jerker), it was about the work. The Critics Choice Association took risks in its rewards. They watched Chalamet playing ping-pong half-blind, Elordi starving in a makeup chair, Stephen Graham doing a one-hour monologue in a single take and thought: This is the bar now.
As we head toward the Oscars, one thing is clear: The industry is turning its back on polished perfection and embracing a gritty, sweaty, technically dazzling brand of realism.
Fandomfans is a platform where you can find latest details on excellent actors’ performances & movies.
