Lanterns Episode 1 Ending Explained: Who Killed Hal Jordan?

Superman got the spotlight and hype as “The Man of Steel is back” but it defines the new era of James Gunn’s DC universe. It isn’t the one we know with the Cape and S-Shield, but comes right after it. It is confirmed now with the Supergirl: Woman of Tomorrow release on June 26. The film is not safe and audience pleasing but a louder and messier and that’s why Supergirl 2026 could end up being the DCU’s most important movie yet. 

She’s Not Your CW Supergirl Anymore

Let’s get one thing out of the way immediately. If you’re picturing Melissa Benoist’s warm, optimistic, “we can all be heroes” version of Kara Danvers — wipe that from your mind. That series and Supergirl version was great on its own level but James Gunn brings a completely different character and storyline.

A Darker, Edgier Kara Zor-El

Gunn and DC Studios made it crystal clear that this version of Supergirl is not that earnest and saving the world type. But a “less earnest and more edgy” type which means they deliver a darker and more complex tone. It’s a direct rejection for an inspiring character which defines previous adaptations. This one is a hero who has seen the worst things that could break most heroes but she is still standing. This Kara carries weight. She carries trauma. And she carries it across the cosmos.

The DCU Chapter One source material tells you everything you need to know. Based on Tom King and Bilquis Evely’s Eisner-nominated comic series, the story follows Kara helping a young girl named Ruthye avenge her father’s murder at the hands of a space pirate named Krem of the Yellow Hills. It’s a revenge road trip set among the stars — part western, part cosmic epic, part character study. It’s not a city-saving origin story. It’s something far more personal.

Milly Alcock Supergirl Is DC’s Secret Weapon

Every franchise has one rule that they cast their superheroes performance lead that nobody saw before. Gal Gadot was unknown before Wonder Woman and Robert Downey Jr. before Iron Man was also unpopular. And Milly Alcock Supergirl? She might just be the best casting surprise of the entire DCU.

From Rhaenyra Targaryen to Kara Zor-El

Milly Alcock played a young Rhaenyra Targaryen role very well. The face expressions and body tone was dynamically balanced when she was told she couldn’t have the thing she was born for. She was rejected by the system to rule and sit on a throne as she deserved. The performance was furious, layered, and heartbreaking all at once.

Now transpose that energy onto Kara Zor-El — a woman who watched her entire world die, who arrived on Earth after Clark Kent had already claimed the Kryptonian legacy, who has every right to be angry and chooses to channel it into something bigger than herself. The parallels are almost too perfect.

James Gunn himself — the man who has cast everything from Groot to Peacemaker, has called the decision to cast Milly Alcock “the best bit of casting” he has ever done. That’s not PR speak. That’s a filmmaker who’s seen the dailies and knows something the rest of us don’t yet.

Read More  👉 Star Wars’ Ahsoka Tano Replacement Succeeded Where Anakin’s Padawan Failed

Jason Momoa as Lobo Is Pure Chaos Energy

Just when you thought the casting couldn’t get more interesting, Jason Momoa entered in a picture. Not as Aquaman. Not as any hero. As Lobo, he was a twisted character who didn’t care about anything. But more dangerously he is a terrible space bounty hunter.

Why the Supergirl + Lobo Dynamic Works

Momoa has wanted this role for years and it shows. The first teaser footage already has fans losing their minds, and the dynamic between Kara’s controlled, purposeful fury and Lobo’s absolute chaotic energy is exactly the kind of unpredictable pairing that makes for legendary cinema. Think of it as the cosmic version of a buddy cop movie where one partner has a moral compass and the other one eats their moral compass for breakfast.

James Gunn has confirmed that Lobo isn’t just a cameo — he’s a vital part of Supergirl’s story. That alone makes this film a must-watch. Because when a character as anarchic as Lobo is woven into the narrative with purpose, rather than just tossed in for fan service, you know the storytelling is operating at a different level.

Read More  👉 Supergirl: Woman of Tomorrow’s Five Planets Explained: Every Alien World Kara Visits

DCU Chapter One Needs This Win

Superman restarted the DC film universe with confidence. It established tone, introduced the world, reintroduced characters audiences loved and characters they hadn’t met yet. But Superman was the foundation. Supergirl 2026 — as the second film in DCU Chapter One: Gods and Monsters — is where that foundation gets tested.

Supergirl Can Make or Break Cinematic Universes

History is pretty clear on this: the second chapter of any rebooted franchise is where audiences decide if they’re truly on board. The first film earns goodwill. The second film spends it. Like Marvel, The Winter Soldier was the biggest hit after Iron Man 2. The dark knight sequel was a cultural event. 

I, Tonya and Cruella director Craig Gillespie is the perfect Director for this film because he already proved his work with films which featured anti-hero women who refused to be defined by what the world expected of them — has openly compared Supergirl to Iron Man in terms of ambition and character-first storytelling. This suggests that the film is set to rule alone not as a universe builder. 

The Backlash Is Actually a Brilliant Sign

Let’s talk about the discourse, because it’s impossible to ignore. There was a trailer line that sparked a full-blown Snyder vs. Gunn fan war online. Tracking numbers fluctuated. Reddit had opinions. Twitter had louder opinions. And somewhere in the middle of all of it, Zack Snyder dropped a cryptic post that sent half the internet into a spiral.

Controversy = Cultural Relevance

Here’s the thing about backlash — it means people care. The films that nobody argues about are the ones that nobody remembers. The Dark Knight faced skepticism before release. Wonder Woman was written off as a risk nobody wanted. Guardians of the Galaxy was literally described by studio executives as a movie that “couldn’t possibly work.”

Every era-defining superhero movie has had a pre-release controversy arc. The ones that survive that arc and deliver something real become classics. Supergirl is already in that arc. The question is just whether it sticks the landing and based on everything we know about the cast, the source material, and the director, the answer looks like yes.

Read More  👉 DC Chapter 2 Latest Update: What Is James Gunn’s New Plan?

Conclusion

Supergirl isn’t trying to be Superman. That’s the whole point. She’s not trying to inspire through warmth or win people over with optimism. She’s trying to be something the DCU desperately needed — raw, cosmic, uncompromising, and unapologetically herself.

With Milly Alcock delivering what James Gunn calls his best-ever casting decision, a source comic that’s won industry awards, Jason Momoa finally getting to be the character he was born to play, and a director who’s made a career out of making complicated women feel like icons — Supergirl: Woman of Tomorrow has every ingredient to be not just DC’s biggest film of 2026, but one of the most memorable superhero films in years. June 26 can’t come soon enough. And when it does, don’t say you weren’t warned.

A special kind of heartbreak is reserved for the “best movies never made.” We preoccupy ourselves with Jodorowsky’s Dune and Del Toro’s At the Mountains of Madness, speculating on how they might have altered the cinematic terrain. In 2026, with Emerald Fennell on the press trail for her raw adaptation of Wuthering Heights, a new identity was officially added to that tragic pantheon: Zatanna. 

For years, speculation has swirled about what the Oscar-winning writer/director of Promising Young Woman and Saltburn might do with DC’s best stage magician. Now, with Fennell’s recent frank interviews, we at last have a peek behind the curtain. 

“It wasn’t a superhero flick, it was a fairly deranged saga about a nervous breakdown.”
–She says

Rewriting the Superhero Origin Story

Fennell depicted Zatanna around the time of a very strong personal and professional transition. Immediately following her Academy Award win, she was catapulted into the high-gloss Hollywood movie star — a world she didn’t quite recognize.

Beyond the Cape

Feigen became the tool she used to filter her alienation through the script. Instead of a typical origin story in which a hero discovers how to use their powers to save the world, Fennell’s Zatanna is a woman coming undone. 

I had this very simple question: “How do I make a superhero movie that I’m comfortable watching with my kids and that personally speaks to me?” I was a woman having a breakdown.
— Emerald Fennell

This wasn’t just “gritty” like we’ve grown accustomed to from DC, it was psychological terror. For a character like Zatanna, who practices Logomancy (speaking backwards to affect reality), a broken mind is a frightening weapon. When the magician loses her grasp on reason, reality itself starts to distort. 

The “Demented” Aesthetic of Fennell’s Vision

If you’ve seen Saltburn, you’re aware Fennell doesn’t do “palatable.” Her take on Zatanna would almost certainly have swapped clean CGI energy blasts for something more tactile and grotesque. 

This incarnation of the character was described as a “hard woman” — untidy, scary, and thoroughly human. It was a dismissal of the “cool girl” trope, instead dwelling on the bodily and cognitive toll of doing magic. 

Why Zatanna Was Never Made

• Bad Robot Bottleneck: The movie was part of J.J. Abrams’ sprawling “Justice League Dark” universe. Despite a $500 million deal, films of John Constantine and Madame X stayed stuck in development purgatory for years, without so much as one frame being filmed.

• The WBD Merger: When WarnerMedia became Warner Bros. Discovery, the directive changed from “growth at any cost” to “debt reduction.” CEO David Zaslav began a “purge” of risky projects—most famously shelving the nearly finished Batgirl for a tax write-down.

• The Gunn/Safran Reboot: In late 2022, James Gunn and Peter Safran assumed control of DC Studios with a charge to create a unified, optimistic “Gods and Monsters” arc. That”deranged” standalone movie about a woman breaking—down simply didn’t fit the new blueprint. 

The Legacy of the Unmade

The removal of Fennell’s Zatanna exemplifies an escalating anxiety in contemporary film: the struggle between auteur ambition and franchise security. While Zatanna probably will debut in the new DCU (if not before in James Mangold’s Swamp Thing), she will unquestionably be a more “stable” version of the character.

Auteur Vision vs Franchise Safety in Modern Blockbuster Cinema

Fennell’s “lost” script is still an intriguing “what if” — a souvenir from a moment when the superhero genre nearly gripped something decidedly raw, unsettling, and revolutionary. It appears that in today’s blockbuster economy there’s a lot of room for monsters, but precious little for meltdowns. 

Read More 👉  ‘Star Trek: Starfleet Academy’ Rebuilds Hope as Episode 6 is Turning Point

Conclusion

The still unproduced Emerald Fennell’s Zatanna is not merely a scrapped project, it’s an alarm that modern blockbuster cinema is too scared to ring. With all the sophistication as well as volatility of the mind, it tested safe franchise logic that was unthinking. What we lost was not a superhero movie, it’s a risk. And in today’s studio system, that may be a rarer magic than any other. 

Fandomfans is a platform where you can get all the deeper details from the DC franchise about characters and movies.