Keanu Reeves Constantine 2 Still Hasn’t Got Confirmation From James Gunn

Written by: Alpana

Published: January 5, 2026, 12:42 pm

If you caught the 31st Annual Critics Choice Awards 2026 on January 4, you saw that the atmosphere at the Barker Hangar was not just about bright lights and glamour. For the fourth year in a row, the night was hosted by Chelsea Handler and it seemed less like a celebratory back slap and more like a nod to hard work.

Whether it was 12-hour makeup sessions or five-minute television episodes, the winners this year didn’t only act, they suffered. The message from the Critics Choice Association (CCA) was loud and clear: in 2026, the line between technical risk and extraordinary physical commitment is where the industry’s attention lies. 

Timothée Chalamet: Marty Supreme in The King of Spin Marty Supreme 

(Best Actor Winner)

The weepy Timothée Chalamet as Brooding Heartthrob, Desert Messiah in Dune is not who Marty Supreme is at all, he’s fully reimagined himself. Chalamet Won Best Actor for portraying a 1950s ping-pong wunderkind based on the real life Marty Reisman.

But this was about more than whacking a ball back and forth. He was described as having a “singularly enervating intensity”. Marty was not a sportsman, but a hustler—a guy who could talk some unbeatable nonsense, who could pair swagger with geeky glasses, and who was so engulfed in his need to win that he was willing to try anything. It was a kinetic, fizzy, electrified turn, the kind that reassures you he can fill a film with their souls alone, and in pure physical comedy. 

Jessie Buckley: The grieving mother in Hamnet 

(Best Actress Winner)

If Chalamet delivered the energy, Jessie Buckley delivered the tears. Taking home Best Actress for her portrayal of Agnes (Shakespeare’s wife) in Hamnet, Buckley gave what could be the most gut-wrenching performance of the year.

The storyline deals with the loss of her child, Hamnet, and the sorrows that led to Hamlet. Buckley’s performance was said to be “a privilege to watch.” She never merely portrayed a historical figure; she captured the raw, earth-shattering agony of a mother fighting to keep her life intact. It was a quiet, powerful turn that stood out against flashier roles, proving that sometimes the loudest emotions are the ones spoken in whispers. 

Jacob Elordi: A Monster Reborn in Frankenstein 

(Best Supporting Actor Winner)

Jacob Elordi is now officially more than just a teen heartthrob. Awarded Best Supporting Actor for Guillermo del Toro’s Frankenstein, Elordi achieved the impossible: he brought us to tears over a monster.1 His role wasn’t about scary make-up or snarling. He reputedly studied Butoh (a Japanese “dance of darkness”) in order to capture the creature’s motions, make such a physicality that was at once a terrifying and sincerely moving figure.

He portrayed the Monster not as a villain, but as an acting soul imprisoned in a grotesque body, one who was turned away from by his maker. It was a “physical” act- ing, in the widest sense — using his back, his shoulders and his eyes as well as his voice. 

Amy Madigan: The Terrifying Aunt Gladys in Weapons 

(Best Supporting Actress Winner)

The lack of appreciation for horror at awards shows makes Amy Madigan’s victory for Best Supporting Actress all the more gratifying. In the surprise hit Weapons as Aunt Gladys, a figure who immediately became a horror icon.

Madigan, a 75-year-old seasoned actress, said she was astonished by the win, she thought people would just “dig” the movie – not fall in love with “terrifying” her character. She teetered between a kooky, eccentric senior citizen and a predatory natural force. To be the most frightening person at the party and be so hypnotically watchable is a rare achievement, and the reviews strongly confirmed that. 

Paul Thomas Anderson’s Big Night 

We may as well not speak of winners without mentioning the night’s biggest—err, biggest champion? Paul Thomas Anderson won both Best Picture and Best Director for One Battle After Another.

The film is densely plotted, an “exquisitely detailed fantasy” about former revolutionaries meeting to rescue a daughter. It’s political and personal and very, very complex – and well, that’s just what the critics called the masterpiece of resistance and hope. I mean it’s not just the one actor here, it’s a conductor (Anderson) behind the wheel of an orchestra of stellar performers (including Leonardo DiCaprio and Teyana Taylor) who create the best film of the year. 

Read More 👉 Five Nights at Freddy 2 Is All About What Survival Takes From You

TV Drama Winners at a Glance:

Category	Winner	Show	Key Context
Best Drama	The Pitt	HBO Max	Medical realism meets pandemic trauma.
Best Actor	Noah Wyle	The Pitt	A return to form with “urgent” authenticity.
Best Actress	Rhea Seehorn	Pluribus	Sci-Fi nuance; playing a resistor in a hive-mind.
Best Limited Series	Adolescence	Netflix	A technical feat of one-shot storytelling.

Genre Bias is Dead

Perhaps the most heartening bit from the 31st Critics Choice Awards is that “Genre isn’t a slur anymore.”Horror and Sci-Fi, two genres long neglected at awards time, dominated the discussion.

• Sci-Fi: Pluribus won big for Rhea Seehorn, interrogating profound philosophical dilemmas about free will through an alien invasion story.
• Horror: Not only did Frankenstein and Weapons (featuring Best Supporting Actress victor Amy Madigan) demonstrate that horror movies could manage organismic collapse AND losing one’s innocence,
• Vampire Epics: Ryan Coogler’s Sinners won for Score and Ensemble, and young Miles Caton took home Best Young Performer. 

Conclusion

The 2026 ceremony wasn’t about the speeches (though Noah Wyle’s tribute to healthcare workers was a tear-jerker), it was about the work. The Critics Choice Association took risks in its rewards. They watched Chalamet playing ping-pong half-blind, Elordi starving in a makeup chair, Stephen Graham doing a one-hour monologue in a single take and thought: This is the bar now.

As we head toward the Oscars, one thing is clear: The industry is turning its back on polished perfection and embracing a gritty, sweaty, technically dazzling brand of realism. 

Fandomfans is a platform where you can find latest details on excellent actors’ performances & movies.

Written by: Alpana

Published: November 28, 2025, 8:31 am

Aniston played Rachel Green on ‘Friends’ for ten seasons from 1994 to 2004, a character whose mannerisms, hairstyle, and love interests defined what it meant to be a 20-something woman around the world. The actress could not be disentangled from the character, it’s hard for everyone to recognize Aniston in other characters. Rachel Green was everywhere, on lunch boxes, in syndication, and in the cultural lexicon.  

Aniston noted that she —
“Couldn’t get over from the shadow of Rachel Green ever in my life” 

describing the experience as “exhausting”. The character was a “poor little rich daddy’s girl”, a specific archetype that afforded little room for the darkness or grit required of dramatic acting. Aniston admitted to fighting with herself and her identity in the industry “forever,” constantly trying to prove 

She was “more than that person”.
—Aniston said

FRIENDS Could have Lost Jennifer Anniston at First

Jennifer Aniston’s whole Friends run nearly never happened because she was at that time already committed to a CBS sitcom titled Muddling Through back in 1994. Because she was “only in second position” for Friends, NBC was worried that they might have to recast Rachel if the CBS show was a hit, and speculated about shooting multiple episodes, only for CBS to pick it up and they’d have to do reshoots. 

Aniston got her big break when Muddling Through was cancelled, and that led to her being cast on Friends – which just goes to show how precarious a career in Hollywood can be, and how one cancellation can make way for the series that takes an actor global and defines their stardom. 

Aniston’s The Good Girl, Horrible Bosses, & Cake break the FRIENDS curse

Helmed by Miguel Arteta, the film stars Aniston as Justine Last, a dour employee at a mall shoe store who has a clandestine relationship with a younger coworker (Jake Gyllenhaal). The choice to accept the part was nerve-racking.  

“Panic that set over me,” thinking, “Oh God, I don’t know if I can do this? Maybe they’re right”.
—Aniston recalls

The film was an independent production, lacking the safety net of a major studio marketing budget or a laugh track. It required Aniston to perform “without a net” in front of the world. The success of The Good Girl and the critical acclaim she received—provided the “relief” necessary to continue pursuing dramatic work. It was the proof of concept that she could exist outside the “purple walls” of the sitcom apartment.

If The Good Girl proved she could be sad, Horrible Bosses proved she could be predatory. The appeal lay in the “black comedy” element. Aniston argued that “Comedy is a necessity,” but she expressed a preference for the “craziness” of the Horrible Bosses universe over the gentler comedy of Friends.

“Maybe everybody else is seeing something I’m not seeing, which is you are only that girl in the New York apartment with the purple walls”.

This quote speaks to the psychological complexity of the curse—it wasn’t only that she believed producers wouldn’t hire her but she was afraid she wasn’t capable of doing the work. 

Breaking the curse required exposure therapy. By performing in independent films like The Good Girl and Cake, where the safety nets of budget and ensemble were removed, Aniston forced the industry to recalibrate its perception of her utility. 

Cake is the ultimate punishment to shatter the curse. In this film, Aniston portrays Claire Bennett, a woman struggling with crippling chronic pain and addiction. Aniston quit exercising and wearing makeup. She studied friends with chronic pain to get a sense of what the condition felt like physically.  

She allowed the role to “hurt” her, noting that during physical scenes, she “didn’t prepare” in the traditional sense but rather let the physical discomfort generate a real reaction.

Read More  👉  Wake Up Dead Man Review: A Bold Mystery but Missing the Knives Out Spark

The Morning Show – The Strong New Chapter For Jennifer Aniston

The morning show era (TMS), Executive produced and co-created by Reese Witherspoon is the shift from Aniston the Actress to Aniston the Mogul. The show is more than just an acting vehicle, it’s a platform for industry commentary and power play. 

The partnership with Witherspoon’s Hello Sunshine production company created an environment of “understanding, compassion and consideration” that Aniston notes 

“Doesn’t always exist amongst the dudes”.

Alex Levy is the culmination of Aniston’s post-Friends evolution. She is a morning news anchor, but she shares no DNA with Rachel Green. Alex is “complex, vulnerable, controlled, lonely, enraged, self-serving”.

In Season 4 (2025), Alex has transcended the anchor desk to become a corporate executive. She is no longer fighting for a contract; she is fighting for the soul of the network. Critics have praised Aniston’s performance in this era as

“It is the best of her performances and able to perform mature characters” 

noting her ability to portray moral conflict without the melodrama that sometimes plagued her earlier dramatic attempts. The role gives Aniston a chance to examine issues of power, complicity and growing older in a way Friends never did. 

Conclusion

By 2025, she’s at a place very few could have predicted back in 2004: she’s the boss. On The Morning Show, she plays a character who runs the network, much like in real life, where she’s a producer on the show. She swapped the “purple walls” of the Friends apartment for the glass walls of the UBN executive suite. Jennifer Aniston has now shown beyond a shadow of a doubt that she is, in fact, “more than that person.” 

Find out celebrities, movies, and web series updates on Fandomfans which is delivering every entertainment buzz to you.