‘Undertone’ Will be Biggest Psychological Horror Backed by A24
undertone Review: A24’s chilling psychological horror turns silence, family, and familiarity into fear, resulting in one of the studio’s most unsettling films.
undertone Review: A24’s chilling psychological horror turns silence, family, and familiarity into fear, resulting in one of the studio’s most unsettling films.
The majority of us thought the lockdown years were pretty exhausting, but director Ian Tuason made that isolation a nightmare—the good kind. His new film, Undertone, is currently the buzz at Sundance, and it’s easy to understand why. It’s a scary, sound-centered psychological horror that came from real-life anxiety and a house that could possibly be haunted now.
We’ve all been there—crashing at your parents’ place is not whatever you’re picturing it’s going to be. But for Tuason, it was a necessity so he could tend to his ailing parents.

In an interview with Variety, he shared his experiences of where he got the idea. While he was there, he began to consider what makes us feel safe —and what happens when you flip that on its head. The Exorcist concept (taking a “safe” daughter and making her scary) and applied it to his own life.
“My mind is stuck on ‘The Exorcist’, how it scared me so much when I was a kid.”
–He said
He wondered, What if my mom, who relies on me, starts speaking in a different voice? That dark thought transformed a simple podcast script into a feature film. He even shot it in his parents’ house to save money, but it came at a price. Living on your own horror set meant he never felt truly alone, and he said the house began feeling “haunted” well after the cameras stopped rolling.

Undertone is distinguished by its sound. The lead, Evy, is the host of a podcast, and the film plays with your ears. Tuason engineered the sound as if you are wearing noise-cancelling headphones.
“Do you know that weird silence level where you have no clue what’s happening in the room behind you?”
–He said
That’s precisely what he employs to frighten you. The film oddballed the sounds that Evy hears on her tapes and the sounds that are really in her hallway.
The hype around Undertone is deafening and it seems like the biggest names in horror are officially placing their bets on Tuason. That’s just the beginning: A24 has already acquired the film and scheduled a March 13 release.

The legends behind Blumhouse and Atomic Monster (the producers of Insidious and The Conjuring) are the ones who brought in Tuason to give the Paranormal Activity franchise a revamp. It’s a complete full circle moment for a guy who started out recording spooky noises in his childhood bedroom. If he can make a DIY movie at his parents’ house this scary, then we can’t wait to see what he does with a Hollywood budget and the keys to one of the biggest horror series in history.
Read More:- Lyonel Baratheon and Tyrion Lannister: How Westeros Repeats the Same Character
Undertone confirms the greatest horror has never been monsters or jump scares—it’s familiarity. By weaponizing a childhood home, a parent’s voice, and silence itself, Ian Tuason crafts a deeply personal and unsettling journey. Its choreography of sound is so perfect that it’s a movie to watch with headphones, each whisper feeling invasive and intimate.
With Sundance buzz, an A24 release, and major horror studios lining up to back Tuason’s next project, Undertone is not just a powerful first feature—it’s the introduction of a filmmaker who gets that the real horror is right at home.
With Fandomfans, you can find all the latest details and behind the scenes of movies and series.
‘The Mandalorian and Grogu’ will bring Star Wars back to theaters in 2026. Discover how Lucasfilm is redefining marketing, budgeting and fan expectations.

Star Wars’ return to the cinema should have felt like a galactic coronation. With the countdown to the release of The Mandalorian and Grogu (May 22, 2026) now well underway, here comes something rather unexpected — confusion.
It was a seven-year gap on the big screen, so people were expecting a “shock and awe” campaign. What they received in Super Bowl LX was a 30-second parody of a Budweiser commercial narrated by Sam Elliott’s gravelly voice that features Tauntauns pulling a sled. It was bold, it was weird, and it signaled a massive change in how Lucasfilm treats its most precious cargo.
Usually a $10 million Super Bowl spot is spent displaying “heavy artillery” — explosions, high-stakes drama and cinematic scale. Instead of a third wall-smashing joke, director Jon Favreau and new leadership team of Dave Filoni and Lynwen Brennan didn’t just shatter the mold; they pretended it didn’t exist.

The commercial, “A New Journey Begins,” indulged full-force in “Comfort Marketing.” Rather than treating the movie as “there’s mythology behind everything, and you have to do your homework” (a common critique of the Sequel Trilogy era), the ad treated the characters as old friends. It puts its chips on the notion that Grogu is a worldwide icon who doesn’t need a plot summary to sell a ticket — he just needs to make people smile.
Industry watchers have been quick to note the “Solo-esque” red flags. Like 2018’s Solo: A Star Wars Story, this movie has a May release date and a somewhat late marketing push. But the internal economics are another story:

A global take of $500 million would have made The Mandalorian and Grogu a massive success, but it would have been a flop for The Rise of Skywalker. The marketing department was allowed to be “bizarre” about the Super Bowl this year on account of the diminished financial burden.
It’s also the creative debut for Dave Filoni. Filoni, the master of “deep cuts” into Star Wars lore, has brought a surprising cast to the table:

Read More 👉 Once Upon a Time in Hollywood: A Love Letter to a Bygone Era (and What Comes Next!)
The Mandalorian and Grogu Star Wars fans expecting as much darkness as Dune will probably find the “Budweiser Parody” off-key. But it is a reminder to the wider world that this franchise can be enjoyable.
Lucasfilm is betting that audiences are ready for a Space Western that values character over complexity after years of galaxy-ending crises. This May will tell if this “confusing” strategy works or ends up as a cautionary tale like Solo. With Sam Elliott narrating and a “swole” Hutt, one thing is certain: this isn’t the Star Wars of 2019. Something much more human.
Fandomfans delivers the latest updates from celebrities, movies and web series to catch up with your favorite characters.
The Housemaid (2025) review explores Paul Feig’s chilling adaptation, powerhouse performances, BookTok success, and the film’s dark take on power and control.

The Housemaid (2025), from director Paul Feig, channels that anxiety with laser accuracy, turning the dream of home life into a stifling mental institution. Based on Freida McFadden’s viral novel, Paul Feig’s adaptation of The Housemaid (2025) strips back the layers of wealth, beauty and privilege to reveal a much darker truth – where control, surveillance and survival intersect within the walls of an ostensibly perfect home.
Distributed in late 2025, The Housemaid, is more than just a film, it is a cultural moment. It’s the summit of the “BookTok-to-Big Screen” assembly line, adapting Freida McFadden’s viral 2022 novel into a “shlock-serious” cinematic extravaganza. Lionsgate got a desperately needed win at the box office, audiences got a deliciously dark holiday diversion that married high-brow psychological tension with the raw exuberance of a 90s erotic thriller.
The story starts with a classic set-up: a stranger enters a closed off system. Sydney Sweeney as Millie Calloway, an ex-con who is so desperate for a job that she ends up at the Winchester estate in Great Neck, Long Island. For Millie, this isn’t just a paycheck—it’s the lifeline that keeps her out of prison.
The Winchesters appear to be the dream employers. Nina (Amanda Seyfried) is the ethereal, if unpredictable, matriarch, and Andrew (Brandon Sklenar), the “perfect” husband who is charming, patient, and seemingly stuck in a marriage with a volatile woman. But the house itself tells a different tale. Millie is hidden away in an attic room that is the polar opposite of the mansion’s grandeur: a tiny room with a door that locks only from the outside.
Just as we’re settling into our rhythm of feeling sorry for Andrew and being scared of Nina, Paul Feig pulls the rug out from under us. Midway through the movie, the point-of-view shift reveals that Nina’s “madness” is not a sign of instability, but a means of survival. The real monster is the one in the tailored suit and the charming smile.
Comedy director Paul Feig (Bridesmaids) demonstrates he has more strings to his bow.
It’s like “a Nancy Meyers movie that takes an unexpected dark twist” he said.
Through employing” huge rewind POV shifts”, Feig compels the viewers to question everything they know, just as we “dig deeper” into social media accounts to uncover the truth behind the filters.
The chemistry the two leads share, and the great contrast of their attitudes, goes a long way to making the film work.
| Character | Portrayed By | Narrative Role |
| Millie Calloway | Sydney Sweeney | The Protagonist, an ex-convict seeking survival. |
| Nina Winchester | Amanda Seyfried | The Employer; hiding trauma behind a mask. |
| Andrew Winchester | Brandon Sklenar | The Antagonist; a charismatic serial abuser. |
Fans of the source material will be delighted that Feig didn’t shy away from the “luridly exploitative” aspects of the book. The novel’s penalties were mental, but the movie leans into bodily terror.
Rather than Millie being punished for leaving books on a table the film is focused on a broken heirloom plate, which triggers a terrifying scene of self-harm.
The ending, too, traded the book’s slow-burn dehydration for a high-octane staircase confrontation. And of course, there’s the “Taylor Swift factor.” Ending the film with “I Did Something Bad” wasn’t just a needle-drop, it was a manifesto of female retribution that set social media on fire.
Aside from the excitement, The Housemaid delves into the “Domestic Panopticon” — the concept that our houses, which are supposed to be our safest spaces, can turn into places of total surveillance and control. It’s a razor-sharp satire of class hypocrisy, depicting how money can purchase a lovely cage, but it can’t always keep the secrets sealed up inside.
With a strong $19 million opening weekend and two sequel novels already written by McFadden, the “Millie Calloway saga” is just beginning. It’s a win for R-rated thrillers and a reminder that sometimes, the most entertaining thing you can watch is a “perfect” life falling spectacularly apart.
Read More:- Best Horror Movies 2025 That Redefined Fear and Prestige Cinema
The Housemaid (2025) is effective when it plays on the twentieth-century fixation on façades — and then delightfully shreds them. Paul Feig adapts a viral thriller into a biting, disquieting satire of power, class and the lies we want to believe when a life looks “perfect.” Led by bold performances from Sydney Sweeney and Amanda Seyfried, the film mixes pulpy jolts with real psychological depth, showing Feig’s talent beyond comedy.
When its gore-soaked climax arrives, The Housemaid has long since made its point: behind every gleaming mansion is a locked door, behind every staged image is a truth ready to explode. It’s stylish and brutal and absolutely fun — precisely the sort of crowd-pleasing thriller that exists in your peripheral vision long after the filters come off.
Fandomfans is focusing on movies and shows deep concepts and providing you full details on your favorite entertainment.