Avengers: Doomsday signals a major MCU reset with the return of Chris Evans and Robert Downey Jr. as Doctor Doom. The whole story and theory.
The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) is now experiencing fundamental change at the executive level. What was once considered to be a steady industry growing is now pivoting into a “hail mary” to bring back the cultural and financial peak from the Infinity Saga. Changing the subtitle for the fifth Avengers movie from The Kang Dynasty to Avengers: Doomsday is not just a branding adjustment, it represents a complete overhaul of the franchise’s core narrative.
By recasting Robert Downey Jr. (RDJ) as Victor Von Doom and Chris Evans as Steve Rogers, Marvel is gambling $1.5 billion that the foundations of the past will hold the weight of the future.
The shift to “Doomsday” comes out of an era of unparalleled chaos. Post Avengers: Endgame, Marvel has had trouble keeping a lid on its sprawling Multiverse Saga. The disappointment of Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania confirmed that Kang the Conqueror despite Jonathan Majors’ performance wasn’t gelling as a Thanos-tier menace.
Marvel brass feared even before Majors’ legal troubles that Kang “wasn’t big enough,” according to IGN. Among the new additions is the return of the Russo Brothers and writer Stephen McFeely—the “old guard” responsible for the MCU’s biggest hits—to guide the way to Doctor Doom.
| Strategic Component | Original Multiverse Plan | The Doomsday Realignment |
| Primary Antagonist | Kang the Conqueror | Doctor Doom (RDJ) |
| Main Anchor | New Generational Heroes | Legacy “Anchor Beings” |
| Creative Leadership | Fluctuating Directors | The Russo Brothers |
The news that Robert Downey Jr would be returning as Victor Von Doom rocked the fandom. He’s playing Doom, after all, but the narrative implications of the face are impossible to ignore. This has given rise to the “Anchor Being” theory based on Stark’s death in Endgame earth-616 has been “deteriorating”, the multiverse may be supplying an “dark mirror” alternative.
Screenrant suggests a 1970 Retcon. “In Endgame, when Tony goes to 1970, the timing of Maria Stark’s pregnancy seems a bit wonky.” The buzz is that the “real” Tony Stark was actually an adopted Von Doom. In this case, RDJ is not playing a variant of Tony, but instead playing the man Tony was always meant to be before he was a Stark.
Doomsday (presumably appearing next to Avatar: Fire and Ash) teasers were leaked that confirmed that Chris Evans is back. But this isn’t the Captain America we know. In the footage, Rogers is seen in a domestic situation that looks like the 1950s and he’s a father, presumably retired, living with Peggy Carter.
This “Nomad” paradigm is a creative challenge. So how does Marvel get Steve Rogers back without undercutting Anthony Mackie’s Sam Wilson?
The Sacrifice Play: Comicbookmovie that Rogers is going to get the “Loki treatment” — dying early in Doomsday to drive home how dangerous Doom is.
The Mentor Role: Rogers could be cast as an inter-dimensional tactician, with Sam Wilson holding on to the shield and the mantle of Captain America.
The most contentious issue is whether this was “planned all along.” While the Kang-to-Doom shift was brought forward by outside influences, the breadcrumbs are there. In Age of Ultron, Tony’s vision of the fallen Avengers brought Steve Rogers saying,
“You could have saved us. Why didn’t you do more?”
In Doomsday, a Stark-faced Doom could be the man who ultimately takes the leap and decides to “do more” out of a genuine desire to save not just his world but all realities alike. Kevin Feige’s revelation that he talked through the Doom idea with RDJ long before the Kang story stalled suggests that Marvel always kept this “In Case of Emergency” glass box ready to break.
Read More 👉 Johnny Depp Returns to Hollywood With a Dark Gothic Comeback
Avengers: Doomsday is an admission that the post-Endgame approach should be abolished. By casting the man who began the MCU to be the man who might end it, Marvel has ensured Doomsday will be the most scrutinized superhero film in history.
With the release in 2026 looming, the MCU finds itself in a bit of a crossroads. It has to show that it can borrow nostalgia to tell a new, deep story, or be remembered as a franchise that ran away into its own shadow because it was too scared of a murky future.
Fandomfansis delivering detailed theories on celebrity joining the blockbuster films. We are focusing on Marvel, DC, and big hits to give you the latest updates.
Caught Stealing is the sleeper in Darren Aronofsky's output, and it includes Austin Butler's best career performance in this exhilarating 1998 NYC narrative.
If you checked the box office rankings in August 2025, you might have thought Caught Stealing was a bomb. It came, it saw, it didn’t come close to recouping even a quarter of its budget. That’s a flop in the cold calculations of Hollywood. But if you dig movies that actually mean something, you already know that box office numbers are never an indicator of quality.
Caught Stealing is a terrific film that was just released at the wrong time. It is a gritty, sweaty, adrenaline-charged tour of 1998 New York City, and it may be the most fun film Aronofsky has ever made. So as it finally comes to streaming, here’s hoping this misunderstood classic can find a wider audience.
Darren Aronofsky is generally known for his brutal misery. From the drug-fueled nightmares of Requiem for a Dream to the pornographic claustrophobia of The Whale, his movies are usually predicated on a formula of obsession triggering madness. You respect his films, but you don’t always “enjoy” them.
Stealing Caught steals the script and flips the script sideways. It’s Aronofsky loosening his tie. He brings his trademark intensity to a crime thriller that seems like a mash-up of Coen Brothers capers and a 90’s action flick. He’s no longer “wallowing” in his character’s pain; he’s feeling the chaos, literally. The upshot is a movie whose balance of excruciating suspense and farcical comedy achieves a tone that’s idiosyncratically, strangely electric.
Forget the hip-swivel of Elvis and the bald menace of Dune. According to Screenrant, In Caught Stealing, Austin Butler completely reinvents his physical presence. He plays Hank Thompson, a washed-up baseball prodigy turned alcoholic bartender.
To promote the part, Butler had to abandon the dehydrated “superhero abs” look for what the production termed the “Baseball Body.” He bulked up with 35 pounds to resemble a ‘90s power hitter — big, heavy and utilitarian. When Hank fights, he does not do karate but he draws on centrifugal force, wielding mundane objects like a bat, looking like a dashing person with the body mass of a football player. It’s a grounded, sweaty turn that brings gravity to the movie. You buy that he’s a guy who’s given up on life, which is what makes it so interesting when he has to fight for it.
Read More 👉 Avatar: Fire and Ash World Premiere Introduces a Darker, Unpredictable Pandora
One of the film’s smartest moves is its setting. By placing the action in 1998, Aronofsky removes the safety net of modern technology. There are no smartphones to GPS a getaway route. There is no cloud to upload evidence to. Hank is alone in the Lower East Side with nothing but payphones, paper maps, and his wits.
This “analog anxiety” imparts a breathless, hands-on energy to the film that so many modern thrillers are missing. It’s a “run and gun” movie powered by a pounding post-punk score that will make your heart race. The camerawork captures the filth of a non-gentrified New York, a city of dilapidated infrastructure and menacing shadows.
The story is straight-up noir, Hank is just an ordinary guy who winds up in the criminal underbelly simply because he agreed to watch his neighbor’s cat. That’s it. That’s the catalyst.
Suddenly he’s being chased by Russian mobsters, a terrifying corrupt cop (Regina King), and a wild card enforcer (Bad Bunny). It’s a “bureaucratic nightmare” of violence in which everyone believes Hank has the MacGuffin, and no one thinks he’s innocent.
With an 84% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, the critics have already determined what the general movie-going audience failed to see in theaters. Caught Stealing isn’t just a movie, it’s a mood. It’s a throwback to an era when action films had texture, when heroes were humble folk enduring a genuinely awful day, and survival wasn’t about saving the world — it was just about making it to the next morning.
Caught Stealing is the sort of movie that sneaks up on you – sharp, frenetic, bruised in both tone and spirit, and infused with a style we had no idea Aronofsky was capable of. It may have been a box office flop, but it’s a matter of time. With its gritty ‘98 vibe, an amazing career-best performance from Austin Butler, and a tone that is at once both panicked and infuriatingly funny, this movie is going to find a cult audience once the word gets out about what they missed in theaters. There are times when the loudest success stories aren’t the best films – but the ones that live with you the longest, after the lights come up.
Fandomfans bring you creative and engaging breakdowns of the movies and shows that you should watch.
Tron: Ares' box office flop stuns Hollywood. Learn why Jared Leto's passion project failed, its $33 million debut, and how it changed his career forever.
The November 2025 release of Disney’s long-awaited sequel, Tron: Ares, fizzled at the box office after a gross that trade observers called a disaster and an “IP-killing event”. The Joachim Rønning directed film made a lackluster domestic debut of $33.2 million to $33.5 million, well below its estimated opening gross by $10 million or more. The opening fell just shy of $60 million worldwide, ranging from $60.2 million to $60.5 million.
Ares not hitting the $100m mark in its opening weekend against its sizable budget made for an early and likely impossible-to-recover-from financial loss for Disney. With the failure, Report said that it is very likely that Disney will “retire the franchise from the big screen” for the foreseeable future, signaling to investors a continued reluctance to finance risky.
The box office doom of Tron: Ares, according to MovieWeb, once again raised and intensified doubts about Jared Leto’s bankability as a star who could anchor a major studio tentpole. The seeds for this industry skepticism were planted three years earlier with the collapse of Sony’s Morbius (2022).
This recurring pattern of financial failure has consolidated a trade consensus that sees Leto as an actor who can’t reliably bring in box office for similar big Intellectual Property (IP) tentpole projects. Industry reports have indicated that “the big paydays Leto received for Ares might well be over,” as studios are increasingly shying away from the actor as a dependable male star draw.
In today’s Hollywood, star viability is inexorably linked to public perception and promotability, more so for those who headline massive franchises for corporations like Disney. Leto also has considerable baggage, including several sexual misconduct allegations (which his representatives deny) that surfaced just prior to the Tron: Ares press cycle.
The allegations posed significant challenges for Disney’s marketing team, with industry executives wondering how the actor could “shoulder the pressure of selling two theatrical movies while dancing around the damning claims”. The controversies had an immediate effect on possible promotional opportunities, creating uncertainty as to whether prominent media outlets would allow him to participate in the usual press routines to help market a blockbuster, making him a major-risk.
Industry peers is also pointed out his self-serving spectacle and unprofessional distraction after his extreme behavior on set including mailing eccentric gifts to Suicide Squad co-stars or walking around on crutches for Morbius. The perceived expense of working with the actor’s process wasn’t anymore worth the result. This professional reputation of being a “pain in the ass” who wastes time, combined with his inability to open wide films makes him a uniquely risky bet for studios that want to run-efficient production and clean PR.
According to People, The flop of Tron: Ares is far more than a box office number, it’s the shattering of an actor’s sincere passion against the cold, hard financial calculations of contemporary Hollywood. For years, Jared Leto was spearheading the movie, leveraging his celebrity and producer credit, dating back to 2017, to bring Disney’s long-dormant sci-fi franchise out of development purgatory. His commitment was authentic; he was a fan of the original film and its tech, and playing the digital warrior Ares was a very personal goal for him.
Read More 👉 Kiss of the Spider Woman (2025): A Dazzling Tale of Love Create a Buzz
The broad consensus in the business is that Leto’s way out is would be to turn on a dime and not be the lead vehicle for a big-budget franchise movie. The most obvious sign of that strategic recalibration: his next role is as Skeletor in Amazon MGM’s Masters of the Universe.
Reports say, This casting is generally regarded as a potential career booster for the actor. Adopting the role of the main villain, Leto once again places the financial weight solely on the IP and the hero, enabling him to focus on crafting a memorable performance. The campy villainous role of Skeletor is a dream role for Leto, and one that lends itself perfectly to his style of transformative acting where he utilises heavy makeup and theatricality (see House of Gucci). How well this transition works will depend on his ability to strike the right balance of “menace and camp,” and keep critics away from dismissing the performance as too silly, a perception that has dogged both his Paolo Gucci and Joker performances.
Leto and his team’s main professional challenge is to manage the promotional risk. Any future promotions around the film will have to strategically separate the actor from the success of the project, downplaying those risky stunts or conversations about method acting that come from set, and instead just talk about the character and the spectacle of the film. The twin flop of Morbius and Tron: Ares have cemented that Jared Leto is simply no longer considered bankable enough to weather the scrutiny and controversy that comes with carrying a mega-budget franchise.
