Kylo Ren's memorable The Last Jedi line changed Star Wars, upending the Skywalker legacy and how fans would engage with the franchise moving forward. Read more!
Kylo Ren uttered a line in 2017 that still makes the fan community go berserk: “Let the past die. Hide it under a rock, if that’s what you need to do. That’s the only way to become what you are meant to be.” We thought he was just a broody dark-sider having a mid-thirties crisis. Looking back on how the Star Wars sequels flailed their way to solid footing, it turns out Ben Solo wasn’t just a villain — he was a saving grace for the franchise.
For nearly half a century, the Star Wars “Skywalker Saga” has been the gravity well of Star Wars. But if it’s going to survive for another half-century, the franchise will need to get away from this Earth. We’re finally coming into an age where movies and games aren’t just ‘side stories’ to Luke’s lineage — they’re a statement of independence.
The sequel trilogy needed to push the continuity forward; yet it found itself anchored all too firmly to the Original Trilogy (OT). This isn’t to say legacy characters are bad; instead, narratives can’t lean on them as a primary structural crutch.
Reaction to Luke Skywalker showing up in the Mandalorian wasn’t universally positive, among fans. A lot of people embraced it, while others dismissed it as “nostalgia bait” — a digital mask to hide an absence of narrative risk. Box office sales wise, playing it safe by making movies about known IP is a guaranteed winner for studios: 100% of the 10 highest grossing Star Wars films have a Skywalker, or a tie to the 1977-1983 era. But the critical exhaustion is tangible. For Star Wars to expand, it has to show it can be without a Skywalker on the credits.
The new film slate marks the most significant departure in franchise history. While The Mandalorian & Grogu will certainly placate the “Filoni-verse” fans with some familiar faces, the real meat is in the unknown:
It’s been five years since the chapter (Rise of Skywalker) ends, and now here we are. Rumors are that there is no legacy character. If it gets that lived-in feel just right — without a single lightsaber ignite or a “hello there” — it could very well shift what the industry thinks Star Wars is.
Mangold is skipping ahead 25,000 years, so by doing so he’s not only stepping around legacy characters, he’s stepping around the entire notion of the Force as we understand it. No Sith, no Jedi Council—just the raw excavation of the galaxy’s mystic energy. This is the “Godfather of the Force” story we’ve been waiting for.
This is the precarious balancing act. Rey may have assumed the Skywalker name, but in order for the franchise to grow, she needs to construct something that isn’t just a mirror image of the failed Academy of the past. If she’s for the entire film talking to Luke’s Force Ghost, we haven’t gotten anywhere, we’ve just switched out the window dressing.
Waititi has said he wants to “broaden out” the world. If his film evokes the cheerful, “used-future” style of the OT without relying on a single legacy cameo, it will demonstrate that the feeling of Star Wars is more powerful than the names in Star Wars.
The films have been wary, but Star Wars games have long been the point of experimental narrative storytelling. The future roadmap indicates a full separation from the “Vader-era” crutch:
| Project | Era | Legacy Risk |
| Star Wars: Zero Company | Late Clone Wars | Moderate. Anakin and Rex are still active here. |
| Star Wars: Galactic Racer | Post-OT | Low. Focused on the underworld and speed. |
| Star Wars: Eclipse | High Republic | Low. Set 200 years before The Phantom Menace. |
| Fate of the Old Republic | Old Republic | Zero. More than a millennium before the films. |
Star Wars Jedi Fallen is the offender right now for taking “Vader-as-a-boogeyman.” For the third game to really connect, Cal Kestis needs to stop being a footnote in the Rebellion’s shadow. He needs a destiny that doesn’t finish with him being “too busy” to give Luke a hand in Episode IV.
If there is one thing the new age should learn, it is the Andor Lesson. Andor showed you can have legacy characters (Mon Mothma, Saw Gerrera, K-2SO) without them feeling like cameos. They didn’t exist because the marketing department wanted a trailer clip, they existed because the plot needed them there.
Star Wars, to its credit, has sometimes been skewered for having precisely no diversity of viewpoint, concerned consistently with a fantasy 1% of the galaxy (the Jedi and the High Command).
In fact the Star Wars audience is diverse: roughly 40% of the active fanbase is female, and international audiences now represent more than half of the box office. Stepping away from the Skywalkers, the saga can tell stories that speak more to this broad, modern audience: tales about smugglers and soldiers and civilians who just happen to not have magic coursing through their veins.
Read More:- Keira Knightley new dark comedy movie ‘The Worst’ with Jamie Dornan and Alicia Vikander
Kylo Ren was right, but with a caveat: we don’t owe the past “killing,” we just have to stop residing in its basement. As it jets to the High Republic, the distant future, and the distant past, Lucasfilm is at last giving the galaxy some room to breathe. Star Wars’ Future Begins Where the Skywalkers (Masterpiece) End.
Dive into the world of entertainment with FandomFans to get every update from your favorite franchise.
Explore the ultimate 90s Movies List proving why 1999 was the best year for cinema, featuring The Matrix, Fight Club, Magnolia & more iconic films.
There is no question that 1999 was a blockbuster year for movies, with countless groundbreaking films that have defined popular culture. Here is 90s Movies List from the mind-boggling visual effects and philosophical musings of The Matrix to the shattering shock and surprisingly heartfelt emotional payoff of The Sixth Sense and the ferocious, anarchic spirit of Fight Club, each movie redefined the genre it was working in and spoke to its own particular audience. It was also a year in which directors and producers took a few chances and the final fruits of their risky labors continue to be enjoyed more than 25 years later. Truly, 1999 set a high bar for what cinema could be.
The last year of the last century was more than just a date on a calendar. It was a tectonic shift in Hollywood: the old guard of cinema collided with a new class of filmmakers who didn’t aren’t run the rulebook. Stanley Kubrick and Steven Spielberg still commanded respect (along with the likes of Francis Ford Coppola and Martin Scorsese), but a new generation was emerging — Spike Jonze, Sofia Coppola, M. Night Shyamalan, David Fincher, Paul Thomas Anderson — and rewriting what a movie could be. The year seemed like the zenith of everything the 1990s had been building toward — indie films gaining mainstream legitimacy, blockbusters getting smart, and moviegoers revved to engage with difficult, out-of-the-way tales.
And there was something else in the cultural air that year. The approaching millennium, and the year 2000, or Y2K, brought with it a sense of collective existential dread that many filmmakers sought to channel— albeit while celebrating the liberating spirit of the past. The upshot: it was a year that not only produced fine films, but fine films of, it seems, every possible genre and style.
When the Wachowskis’ The Matrix opened in March, they hadn’t simply made a movie — they’d changed the language of action cinema forever. Featuring revolutionary “bullet-time” visual effects and questions about the nature of reality, kung fu, science-fiction, and existential philosophy, The Matrix was like nothing anyone had seen before.
Keanu Reeves’ quietly assured turn as Neo has become iconic, with Laurence Fishburne and Carrie-Anne Moss also excellent. The film made $466 million worldwide and continues to inspire filmmakers today. What was remarkable wasn’t just the new technology — it was how that new technology allowed for the expression of high-level ideas about free will and reality that were easy to grasp.
M. Night Shyamalan made a striking debut with a psychological thriller that turned into a cultural touchstone. Bruce Willis, making a bid for dramatic respectability, was a perfect match for nine-year-old Haley Joel Osment in a movie that was really just a series of linked ghost tales. The movie’s legendary twist is one of film’s best kept surprises — an ending that rereads everything you’ve seen.
But the most important thing about the twist is that it didn’t come off as a cheap trick – it is earned, powerfully, through carefully-crafted screenwriting and emotional veracity. The Sixth Sense grossed $672.8 million worldwide to be the second-highest grossing film of 1999, and it still holds up as a tender thriller that’s all in suggestion, not blood.
David Fincher’s adaptation of Chuck Palahniuk’s novel was not only one of the most violently thought-provoking movies of the year. It was, paradoxically, one of its most rewarding experiences. What is discomfiting at first becomes addictive at second, third, and even fourth viewings. As the insomniac, crumbling narrator Edward Norton struggles not to fall under the spell of charismatic Tyler Durden, Brad Pitt dive bombs into a ferocious satire of consumerism, fragmented masculinity, and contemporary rebellion.
That film’s twist is quieter and morally ambivalent, and works by revealing a narrator’s split mind. With an IMDb rating of 8.8, Fight Club has risen above the backlash that it received at its release and has been seen as a film of true artistic merit masquerading as mindless entertainment that causes conversations about meaning and social critique.
Mendes (Bond) debuted behind the camera on features with the year’s Oscar darling, taking home five Academy Awards, among them Best Picture and Best Actor for Kevin Spacey. Darkly satirical about suburban American culture, the trend was immediately established – Mendes and screenwriter Alan Ball were revealing the emptiness behind Middle America’s perfectly trimmed lawns.
It was one of the rarest of things in Hollywood: a critics hit that also became a box office giant, raking in more than $350 million on an unassuming $15 million budget. That’s not to say that the film’s reputation hasn’t been reconsidered in recent years, though its impact on cinema is certainly undeniable.
The last film of Stanley Kubrick was meant to be his big comeback. What the viewers were offered was something much richer: a relationship drama hiding behind the trappings of a thriller, a farcical, sexual black comedy, and a reflective film on marriage and desire.
Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman gave raw performances, and Kubrick’s obsessive direction turned a well-worn story line into something truly disturbing and thought-provoking .
Spike Jonze’s first feature film’s concept, a portal into the thoughts of actor John Malkovich might have been a novelty, but Jonze uses it to examine identity, obsession and the nature of consciousness itself. Cameron Diaz, John Cusack, and Catherine Keener give surprisingly profound performances in what easily could have been a straightforward comedy.
Toy Story 2 showed that animated sequels could say something artistically, rather than just being financial grabs. It helped establish Pixar as a studio that treats its adult intelligence and emotions—and it remains one of the most powerful films in Pixar’s entire library.
When it hit theaters in 1999, it revolutionized the horror genre with its use of found-footage style narration, minimal production costs, and a genius marketing strategy that obscured fact and fiction.
The Blair Witch Project become the excessive horror which success demonstrated that people could be entertained simply by a story and a mood, without elaborate special effects or movie stars.
Magnolia interlaces a number of connected stories throughout the day and night. At its heart, the film is about guilt, forgiveness, regret, trauma, coincidence and connection between people. The various characters’ lives intersect in small (and occasionally stunning) ways, leading up to one of the most-discussed finales in contemporary film.
Magnolia is now considered a cult classic, and is often regarded as one of the best films of 1999 and one of the best ensemble films ever. It’s flawed and difficult, and so human — all of which is why it continues to provoke discussion more than twenty years on.
The “Best Man” (1999), directed by Malcolm D. Lee, is a romantic comedy that rode the wave of popularity of the genre back then. With a predominantly Black cast, the movie is about a group of college friends coming back together for a wedding. Taye Diggs is a rising novelist whose latest book causes trouble — it’s a roman à clef that draws on their own lives.
Warm, funny and sexy, the film was a box office hit and managed to distinguish itself without crass commercial exploitation or without being too blatantly positioned as a “milestone” in Black representation. Executive produced by Spike Lee, who is also the director’s cousin, “The Best Man” continues to hold a treasured place in the romcom canon.
Read More:- Critics Choice Awards 2026 Honor Best Performances — Top Winner List
What is interesting is that 1999 itself was not universally hailed as the best year in the 90s Movies List. American Beauty took the Oscar, but Being John Malkovich was more highly lauded. Fight Club divided opinions upon its release. It was a long time before audiences and critics as a whole realized what they had experienced that year: They’d been treated to something extraordinary—an entire year in which the movies seemed vital, even dangerous, and endlessly inventive.
In an era when blockbuster culture reigns and original concepts have a hard time securing funding, 1999 stands as a powerful testament to what can be achieved. It was the year that arthouse brains met Hollywood brawn, when first-time filmmakers could become auteurs overnight, and when a movie didn’t have to come from a known property to become culturally significant. Looking back, 1999 was not just a great year for movies — it was the year that movies proved that they still mattered.
Dive into the world of 90s movie list with Fandomfans and get every detail from your movies, series and celebrity.
Henry Cavill teams up with Guy Ritchie in In The Grey, a stylish heist-war action thriller starring Jake Gyllenhaal, set to release April 2026. Read more...!
Action movies today repeat themselves, there are so many superhero sequels and recycled reboots, and much of the genre’s thrill has been sapped. The audience long for the day when movies depended on big scripts, big action and big stars that looked like they were really having fun. That’s where Guy Ritchie steps in.
On April 10, 2026, he is set to release In The Grey—a movie that’s stylish, chaotic and a departure from the usual blockbuster template. After about two years of being trapped in limbo, it’s finally ready to be seen, and early word is that it may well be the biggest action thrill spring.
The biggest selling point here isn’t a comic book logo, it’s the chemistry. Ritchie has, in a sense, created his own cinematic universe for a core group of actors who speak his particular language of quick bluster and sudden brutality.
At the center is Henry Cavill as John Grey. Forget the Man of Steel, think Cavill in the “rogue operator” mode. Eiza González is a badass agent (no damsels in distress here) and the always enigmatic Rosamund Pike, and you’ve got a cast that can make even the simplest premise a must-watch cinema. He’s teaming up with Jake Gyllenhaal, who is fresh off the visceral intensity of The Covenant.
The chemistry looks like it’d be electric: Cavill as the chilly, tactical “man in the chair” and Gyllenhaal as the kinetic wildcard who brings a rocket launcher to a puzzle.
Read More 👉 ‘Undertone’ Will be Biggest Psychological Horror Backed by A24
What is it in In The Grey that makes it look like a convincing mix of both Ritchie’s styles — the stylish criminality of gangster flicks and the kinetic action of his kinetic action movies?
We may all have a soft spot for the wry, suit-clad criminals of The Gentlemen, but that gritty military accuracy of The Covenant got us too. That film is right on the line, it exists in the shadows if you will.
The storyline revolves around swindling a billion-dollar fortune from an oppressor named Salazar, in the sun-bleached volcanic setting of the Canary Islands.
It begins as a high-class heist, negotiation at casinos, smoky chat in cafes — but gradually spirals into total war. It’s “extraction” & “robbery,” so you get the sniping of a chase flick and the heavy artillery of a war flick.
Production has already began in 2023, but we will going to see on the screen in 2026. That sounds risky but it’s really strategic. The film was taken off from Lionsgate to Black Bear Pictures, as the film was pulled from the “dump month” of January and repositioned as a major spring release. No disaster film — just smart timing.
By April 2026, In The Grey could be the “dad movie” of the decade — a throwback to star-driven, R-rated action that doesn’t require you to do your homework. It’s loud, it’s stylish and it’s counting on the basic enjoyment of seeing Henry Cavill and Jake Gyllenhaal detonate things on a pretty island.
Fandomfans delivers latest update from movies, series, and celebrities.
