Watch the trailer for Pluribus, a thrilling sci-fi drama from Breaking Bad creator Vince Gilligan. Starring Rhea Seehorn, streaming on Apple TV+from Nov, 2025.
Apple TV+ has posted the trailer for PLURIBUS, the much anticipated new series from the Emmy Award-winning creator of Breaking Bad and Better Call Saul, Vince Gilligan. The nine-episode sci-fi drama, which is Gilligan’s first big project outside of the Breaking Bad universe in 17 years, will debut on November 7, 2025, and is already causing a stir within the US entertainment industry.
The two-minute official trailer, debuting October 21, 2025, gives a peek at an incredibly disturbing world revolving around Carol Sturka (Rhea Seehorn), who’s “the most miserable person on Earth” and has to “save the world from happiness.” The trailer shows that Carol is the only who appears to be immune to the virus, which has turned the entire global population into perpetually content, optimistic and unnervingly cheerful individuals.
The trailer shows the environment around Carol is unrealistic, everyone is enjoying an ultra level of joy and helpfulness that covers the entire horrible psychology under the wrap of positivity. US President (Peter Bergman) reaches out to Carol through television to turn her into one of them because she is the only one who wasn’t affected by the virus.
As Deadline reports, the series is full of action with explosions, plane crashes, dead bodies, and chaos of marching hordes. The most captivating scene occurs in the 2 minute trailer — Carol asked for a grenade, bazooka, and tank from one of the DHL workers and he said “Oh, sure”.
Carol is alone in her misery and trying to reverse all of this but her head is full of confusing thoughts. It’s the kind of thing that messes with your head but keeps you hooked with its dark humor and sci-fi suspense.
Bob Odenkirk is Gilligan’s trusted partner in crime, and the one who plays the great Saul Goodman in Breaking Bad and Better Call Saul. Screenrant mentioned Odenkirk told The Hollywood Reporter in an interview: “I don’t know a goddamn thing. But I know it’s going to be massive. Giant! It’s going to be the biggest thing, well, since sliced bread, but really since Game of Thrones.”
Odenkirk also compared PLURIBUS to the Apple TV+ prestige hit Severance, saying, “I think that [PLURIBUS] is going to be the next big show, and I can’t wait”.His excitement is especially interesting as he is not involved with the project at all, which implies honest belief in Gilligan’s vision.
IndieWire also raved on Gilligan’s turn to Twilight Zone – and it asks if happiness is “actually a good thing when it’s universal and unquestioned. The series delves into themes of coerced conformity, the worth of genuine feeling and if the uniform happiness removes the need for humanity.
Read More 👉 Keanu Reeves Constantine 2 Still Hasn’t Got Confirmation From James Gunn
Critics have praised the trailer as it delivers fascinating, strange sequences in the series. It shows the level of Gilligan’s signature cinematography once again after Breaking Bad.
Gilligan revealed the conceptual origins of PLURIBUS with Entertainment Weekly, Gilligan said the concept initially confused him: “I’m still not exactly sure what it means.” But the relevance of the concept to the divided society we live in today was obvious to him: “There’s no question that we live in a very divided nation. What I love about this series and that potential is the hope that people watching may say, ‘What would that be like, if we all got along?’ There’s probably an element of wish fulfillment in that idea.”
Apple TV+ had already ordered two seasons prior to premiere—a rare move demonstrating extraordinary confidence in Gilligan’s vision. The early renewal can be taken as a sign that Apple sees PLURIBUS as a potential flagship show in the vein of Ted Lasso and Severance.
“When you smile the whole world smiles with you— and Rhea Seehorn is finding out the reverse is also true.” This inversion of optimism into terror marks PLURIBUS as perhaps Gilligan’s most philosophically daring episode to date, posing the question of whether a reality devoid of suffering, strife and genuine feeling is one that deserves salvation—or if, through Carol, misery makes her the last real human being on the planet.
This series will air on 7 November, 2025 on Apple TV with a total of nine episodes in one season. Rhea Seehorn, Karolina Wydra, and Carlos Manuel Vesga are lead actors in the series who take this one on the top of the list.
The Landman Season 2 delivers deep character development, powerful drama, and emotional twists as Demi Moore and Ali Larter take center stage.
The oil fields in Texas aren’t the only things rumbling — Season 2 of Landman has arrived to a whirlwind of reactions. In a new interview with Collider’s Steve Weintraub, lead stars Demi Moore and Ali Larter discussing the high stakes of the new chapter and the controversy surrounding it. The audience score, however, is pretty brutal at just 35% on Rotten Tomatoes. But Moore and Larter insist that Season 2 “gets rid of Taylor Sheridan’s biggest criticism,” promising more character development at the center of the story.
A recurring criticism that is made about the “Sheridan-verse” is that its supporting characters, and specifically the women, are subject to stagnation.This was made a particular point of criticism in Landman Season 1 documentation, with Ali Larter’s Angela Norris—ex-wife of lead protagonist Tommy Norris (Billy Bob Thornton)—and her daughter Ainsley noted they changed (relatively) little despite upheavals.
“Larter and Moore have said that the first impression is a long game to have the biggest dramatic effect with it.”
The characters, in particular Angela — who is back home on a more permanent basis are revealed at their most unstable, a creative decision that has occasionally turned off early viewers who let loose with uncontrollable reactions to certain scenes in the premiere. Co-star Michelle Randolph (Ainsley) on her character’s journey.
This arrangement frames initial disappointment as a purposeful narrative groundwork for subsequent, more satisfying development, suggesting the characters’ complexities are a slow burn that anticipates viewer buy-in.
“Then you’re able to watch 2 women who are fierce in different ways on the same show and that’s something I think that we love and kind of relate to.”
Most importantly, the show is quick to address what seemed like a waste of Demi Moore in the previous season. In Season 1, her recurring role as Cami Miller was minimal, which prompted “flak” from viewers. After a death, Cami assumes a powerful new post as co-head of M-Tex Oil with Tommy Norris, which gives Moore not only the spotlight but the professional freedom her character had never before enjoyed. The change of focus is a clear signal that it intends to grow the range of female leaders and complexity within the cutthroat Texas setting.
More to do with the structure-defense of the writing itself, but Moore and Larter did vow that the payoff for viewer patience would be well worth it. They echoed the sentiment that fans need to
“brace themselves for an extremely intense, heartbreaking journey ahead”.
The story in Season 2 is largely a clash between the “high stakes competitive oil business” and a “fragile family dynamic.” Cami’s rise into corporate power and Angela’s fraught reunion with her familial unit are the central conflicts. In the boomtown economics of West Texas, where a single “gusher can build empires or shatter lives overnight,” the emotional toll is high.
By calling the season “heartbreaking,” the actors are signaling that the growth of the characters will be hard-fought and that the brutal realities of the business will be tied to personal upheaval for the protagonists.
In the interview, the stars also talked about their past and what they wanted for the future of the linked Taylor Sheridan world. Larter and Moore provided anecdotes about the “projects that changed them as actors and people” that they bring into their current Landman roles.
“that was such an interesting script in the way that he approached that world. It was raw, and it was edgy, and it was vulnerable. I’m going there.”
Moore’s Landman appearance comes on the heels of a career-defining moment, having received praise and an Oscar nod for her turn in the 2024 horror film The Substance. This outside affirmation serves to reinforce the dramatic heights she takes Cami Miller to in the expansion of Season 2.
The discussion naturally came around to the possibility of crossovers with other Sheridan series. And although Billy Bob Thornton has previously expressed interest in a darker crossover with Mayor of Kingstown, co-creator Christian Wallace has expressed interest in bringing back 1883 stars Tim McGraw and Faith Hill with Thornton in Landman , illustrating the recirculating talent pool and how easily these stories cross paths.
Read More 👉 Why the Emotional Closure of Bel-Air Season 4 Will Define the Legacy of the Dramatic Reboot
The message Demi Moore and Ali Larter want to send is clear, Landman Season 2 is all about building on character. Though the initial audience score is low, the actors promise that the characters are not static, changing dolorously and dramatically through the season. The critical consensus, calling Season 2 “stronger than the first”, supports the expectation that emotional and developmental payoff for Cami and Angela’s high-stakes journey is around the corner. Fans who are patient enough to travel the difficult road from “point A” to “point Z” will find their patience rewarded.
Fandomfans love diving deep into the worlds that fans obsess over. We deliver breakdowns, character guides, reviews, and updates that help you stay ahead of the curve.
Derry Review assesses IT Chapter Two, in which CGI fright tactics supplant the psychological terror that rendered Pennywise so haunting and memorable.
When IT: Welcome to Derry aired on HBO at the end of 2024, fans of the genre thought it was going to be a new version of Stephen King’s horrifying world. But in its opening episode, the series offered something else — a very familiar (and not in a good way) experience. The very thing that made IT (2017) a triumph is what turns the prequel’s opening moments into a warning: the misapplication of horror principles that plagued IT: Chapter Two. And if you’re wondering where things went haywire, strap in — because it’s a lesson the franchise should have gotten the first time around.
“Young Matty Clements” The Original Story begins on the night of a snowstorm, a boy called Matty Clements running from his abusive father with nothing else but hope, young Matty Clements. He is taken in by a seemingly warm family, and for a fleeting moment the audience experiences genuine relief for him. Then everything goes horribly wrong. A grotesque, computer generated, winged thing explodes out of the car in a welter of blood. It’s supposed to echo Georgie’s death in the original movie — a chilling first taste of Pennywise’s real form. But here is the problem: it couldn’t be more wrong.
Compare with Georgie’s’s iconic death in IT (2017). Director Andy Muschietti choreographed that scene with surgical precision. Bill Skarsgård’s Pennywise was this chillingly intimate, yet threateningly expansive. The Georgie and clown talk gained genuine dread through conversation and psychology rather than spectacle. Every second seemed well-earned, every shock felt intimate. Pennywise took advantage of Georgie’s particular weakness — his faith in strangers, his wish to get back his boat. That’s efficient terror.”
That’s when it gets frustrating. IT: Chapter Two (2019) in particular was derided for eschewing the psychological horror that made the 1990 version so effective. The sequel padded itself out with a two-hour-and-forty-nine-minute running time, repetitive solo missions for every Loser Club member, and most damningly a dependence on cartoonish CGI monster moments. Critics were not shy about it—the attack on the Paul Bunyan statue, the grotesquerie creature designs, the visual spectacle that is not actually scary. It was like someone told the filmmakers: Bigger means better, and they darted off blindly downhill.
Chapter Two’s Rotten Tomatoes rating fell 23 points from the original. Box office receipts plummeted by more than $230 million. The message from the crowd was plain: we don’t want spectacle, we want atmosphere.
So what Welcome to Derry accomplishes in its first few minutes? It’s the exact same error. That demon baby on the fly, that horrific beast bursting out of the family vehicle, the extended gore set piece — it’s all Chapter Two’s playbook, dusted off and amazon prime-ready. The scene goes on uncomfortably long, giving up slow-building suspense for cheap scares.The winged creature reappears at the end of the episode and that moment works better narratively, though it can still not come close to the real terror of the opening of the original film.
Read More 👉 Fallout Season 2 Episode 2 Breakdown: Shady Sands’ Death & the Mojave’s Brutal New Rules
This isn’t just one badly staged scene. It’s a matter of philosophy.” IT worked because it knew something fundamental: Pennywise is scariest when horror feels close and personal. The warped Judith painting that plagues Stan, the leper that represents Eddie’s hypochondria, Georgie’s guilt-induced visions — these are mental terrors sculpted around each character’s unique fears.
Welcome to Derry had the formula for greatness. It was allowed to roam in the characters, new traumas, and the societal canvas of ’60s Derry, free from the constraints of a single Stephen King novel. It got a chance to fix Chapter Two’s mistakes. Instead, it fell all over itself, hurrying for a big monster moment without cultivating the mood of dread that makes Pennywise really scary.
Welcome to Derry has already made beats of learning this lesson in later episodes. Hallucination sequences customized to characters’ fears, atmosphere-building scenes using lighting and suspense, and sequences that prey on mental fragility have far outperformed those big CGI set pieces.
If the show continues on this path – sacrificing spectacle to pummel us with character-specific horror – maybe it’ll break its cycle for once. Because the big lesson isn’t that bigger is better. It’s that personal psychological terror will always stand the test of time over a computer-generated creature, no matter how cool it looks on screen.
IT: Welcome to Derry doesn’t come up short for lack of concepts, it wavers because it abandons what made IT so terrifying to begin with. The franchise was at its weakest when Pennywise ballooned into giant CGI monstrosities; it was at its best when fear tiptoed in silently, cloaked in guilt, trauma, and anxieties so personal they couldn’t be named. Instead of building suspense, the series starts with spectacle in what briefly amounts to the exact mistake that undermined IT: Chapter Two.
That’s not to say the show is irredeemable. Its succeeding episodes point to a more comprehensive approach to psychological horror derived from building atmosphere, character-based dread and the gradual disintegration of safety. If Welcome to Derry keeps playing to those strengths, it can still do right by Stephen King’s legacy instead of watering it down. Because Pennywise, at the end of the day, does not need wings, or blood sprays, or extra run time in order to be frightening — he just needs to get close enough to whisper.
Dive deeper into the cinematic world with Fandomfans to get all the details from your favorite genre.
