Explore the Future of the MCU, including returning heroes, the upcoming Avengers movies, and major story changes shaping Marvel's next phase.
Benedict Cumberbatch has an extraordinary double billing in Hollywood right now. He’s in, a cornerstone, really, of Marvel’s almighty cinematic universe (MCU). On the flip side, he has a solid independent film career, as evidenced by his upcoming film, The Thing With Feathers. That balance of blockbuster dominance and arty experimentation speaks to his versatility, and the power of his star.
Reports indicate that the MCU is the financial foundation and global visibility for Cumberbatch, but projects like The Thing With Feathers are vital to keep his critical worth alive. This file claims the actor is now carrying out a “legacy management” approach, wielding clout to influence the creative direction of his blockbuster commitments and demonstrated by his producing role and director selection preferences while also going back to his experimental, literary roots in adaptations.
The Thing With Feathers is a departure from the visual effects-laden projects that Benedict Cumberbatch has been attached to of late. From acclaimed novelist Max Porter’s bestselling novella Grief Is the Thing with Feathers, the film preserves the book’s idiosyncratic, poetic form and surreal atmosphere.
The plot revolves around an unnamed London father (Dad) and his two sons as they struggle to survive in the wake of the sudden death of their wife and mother. Into their mourning home comes Crow— a frenzied, mythic character who says he’ll remain until the family no longer requires his presence. Crow is the physical manifestation of grief, so for Jack, it’s the personification of losing his wife.
Helmed by Dylan Southern, it employs a dreamlike non-linear narrative to bring Porter’s emotional, stream of consciousness novel to life on the screen, mixing stark household realism with surreal horror.
Cast Highlights
Benedict Cumberbatch as Dad – a profoundly raw portrayal of mourning, more in line with his work in Patrick Melrose than Doctor Strange.
David Thewlis as Crow – a sinister but bright, guardian and bully.
Richard and Henry Boxall play the brothers, and this is the one that really did engage me emotionally.
The movie doesn’t treat grief as hushed sorrow, but as frenetic, cluttered, and terrifying. Crow becomes the father’s Jungian shadow, making him face feelings he seeks to escape – turning the tale into a psychological thriller where the real beast is internal suffering.
Cumberbatch’s acting is considered to be one of the best if not the best. Praise for him speaks of him being in “terrific shape” and turning in a performance that is “confidential and emotional”. The Guardian also notes that:
“While the attention is on the home drama the film is involving and
affecting.”
Cumberbatch is reportedly taking a more “hands-on producerlike” role who will be able to handle the visual spectacle, with the film’s intellectual depth in the making of the film.
“very protective of the character and wants a director”
—He said
Read More 👉 Fallout: How the Post-Apocalyptic Giant Is Still Ruling the Streaming World
Cumberbatch gave an interview in early 2025 in the dance where she said she would not be appearing in Avengers: Doomsday (2026), sparking rumors that the character would be written out. However, in the The Thing With Feathers premiere at Sundance he flatly corrected reports.
“I got that wrong, I’m in the next one.”
—Cumberbatch said and also joked to fans,
in reference to the tight Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) and secrecy culture that Marvel instills, which frequently has its actors feed false information to the press to protect surprises.
It is now confirmed that Doctor Strange will appear in Avengers: Doomsday (2026) and will have a “huge” role in Avengers: Secret Wars (2027).
Strange’s place in Secret Wars should be similar to his prominence in the comics, acting as second-in-command (“Sheriff of Agamotto”) to Doctor Doom, leader of the multiverse’s remains (Battleworld). Robert Downey Jr., reprising his role for the first time as Doctor Doom from the MCU, the dynamic between Cumberbatch and Downey Jr. (who also starred together as Sherlock Holmes and Iron Man, respectively) recently tops for the studio.
The next few years are crucial for Benedict Cumberbatch. In a London flat in “The Thing With Feathers” audiences will also get to see him unmasked and fighting a figurative crow. This part reconfirms his dramatic obama essay credentials and acts as a Salto dancer à la spectacle au lieu de suivant.
At the same time, the Marvel Cinematic Universe machine is turning toward him. The active development here is Doctor Strange 3, strongly based on the “Time Runs Out” storyline, and his already confirmed appearance in Avengers: Doomsday, marking him as the story lead of the Multiverse Saga’s concluding chapter. Bird-themed surrealist or multiversal terrors: on both, Benedict Cumberbatch is at the center of two vastly different though thematically connected cinematic universes.
Fandomfans is a platform to provide quick updates on entertainment, anime, reviews & celebrity news. Our goal is to bring you valuable and accurate information on your favorite entertainment buster.
Explore all James Bond movies in order, iconic fight scenes, unforgettable villains, and how 007 evolved across six decades of cinema.
James Bond fighting is so much more than flashy action sequences. It is a six-decade journey through the evolution of fight choreography on film, changing global attitudes toward violence and the increasing complexity and artifice of stunt choreography in the movies. Ian Fleming once described Bond as a “blunt instrument” of the state—a man made to achieve results, not to be elegant while doing so.
It prefers its action to be muscled, aggressive, and violently blunt rather than graceful or theatrical. While Bond in Fleming’s novels was taught boxing and judo to mirror commando skills of the Second World War, cinematic 007 has evolved into more of a living painting, adapting to the martial philosophies, political climates and cultural sensibilities of the era.
The best fight scene in No Time to Die is the punishing stairwell brawl in Safin’s lair, where Bond is up against three armed adversaries in a narrow slab of concrete. Filmed in long, fluid shots, the scene is relentless and tiring, highlighting Craig’s older, injured Bond relying on instinct on the battlefield.
There’s a weight behind each punch, every gunshot is earned, and being in a tight space doesn’t bring with it any glitz. It’s Bond the hardened survivor, not the dazzling hero—pragmatic, efficient, and potently human. This moment perfectly embodies the movie’s themes of sacrifice, perseverance and the physical toll of being 007.
Spectre contains a loving nod to the From Russia With Love train fight, with Bond facing off against Mr. Hinx (Dave Bautista). It’s destructive, shattering several train cars. Bautista was starting to be “gentle,” but Craig told him to be more brutal.
Bautista complied, hurling Craig so violently that he left the actor with a serious knee injury (meniscus tear), forcing him to wear a brace for the rest of the shoot and ultimately having surgery. This fight, then, features real pain and injury from both players.
“Casino Royale” jolted the audience with its unsentimental brutality right from the start of the film. Shot in high-contrast grainy black & white the fight isn’t clean, it is chaotic and crude and Bond ends the fight bleeding. Bond attempts to drown his quarry, Fisher, in a sink, the quarry fights back. There is no elegance here.
The cinematography is in keeping with Cold War noir and spy fare such as The Ipcress File while confirming that this Bond is a “blunt instrument” and implying that he’s still coming to terms with the emotional cost of killing. The scene was intentionally to feel unchoreographed, to ball the struggle and the fatigue of taking a life.
Die Another Day is widely derided for its use of terrible CGI (the invisible car, the tsunami surfing, etc.), but the fencing match between Bond and Gustav Graves (Toby Stephens) at the Blades Club is a rare moment of hands-on stunt work. It begins as a civilized fencing bout and ends with a full-on broadsword brawl, wrecking the club set.
Trevelyan is Bond’s equal—a fellow “00” agent with the same training. The battle is a mirror match. Most importantly, the sequence mutes out the bombastic score and all we can hear is the metallic thuds, the heavy breaths and the wind. This sound design decision highlights the brutal intimacy of two friends attempting to kill each other.
The fight is a combination of technical grappling and dirty fighting (headbutts, biting), Bond finally throwing Trevelyan to his death. The classic line “For me” in response to Bond’s “For England, James?” that he answers shortly after meeting Trevelyan, signals a personal change in Bond’s motivation.
In The Living Daylights, the tussle between Bond and Necros clinging to the outside of a cargo plane is a marvel of aerial stunt work. Withstood the strain Unlike the green-screen-laden sequences of later times, this was shot with stuntmen (BJ Worth and others) actually hanging from a plane over the Mojave Desert.
The physical struggle, as well as the roaring wind (sound design has a significant role in that), make it all very disorienting and high-risk. It’s a battle dominated by gravity, not martial arts moves.
Licence to Kill is the bloodiest of the pre-Craig Bond films, and was the first to be given a 15 rating in the United Kingdom. The Bimini barrelhouse brawl is a highlight for its raw brutality. Bond isn’t trying to get away as he fights; He’s trying to do as much damage as possible. They refer to pool cues, broken bottles and a brawl that seems more at home in a western saloon than a spy movie.
The scene is staged and lit to highlight the fearsome Jaws, playing with shadows (the train closet) and jump scares. Bond is completely physically impotent; he punches Jaws in the jaw and breaks his hand — a world away from Connery’s crushing blows to Grant’s neckline. This makes Jaws a supernatural entity.
The resolution Bond stabs Jaws with a jagged lamp, delivering an electric shock is a variation on the Oddjob demise that includes a comic bounce, as Jaws endures and then departs. The sequence was choreographed by Bob Simmons, maintaining the trilogy of train fight masterpieces.
The beach fight and the hotel room brawl with Draco’s men reveal a new editing philosophy employed by director Peter Hunt. Hunt used quick cuts, jump cuts and a little bit of speeded up footage to make the fights more energetic. This gave the film a visceral, almost frenzied feel that anticipated the “shaky cam” mode of the Jason Bourne series by several decades.
The brawling judo fight is a demonstration of this transition from the chaotic to the slightly more stylized fighting in Dr. No. Bond uses the environment, a sofa, and a large statue to fend off the sumo’s size, continuing the message that Bond has to change his fighting style to whatever culture he’s invading.
When you ask people who know what they are talking about when it comes to the Bond movie library what the best is, it’s almost always From Russia With Love that is named, the duel between Bond and Donald “Red” Grant (Robert Shaw) on the Orient Express stands as a cornerstone moment in action movie history. It took the genre away from the bloodless fisticuffs that defined 1950s action films to a more visceral, claustrophobic reality.
The development of James Bond’s style of fighting is indicative of a narrative that’s about more than just choreography or spectacle. Every punch, wrestle, and fight for life is a product of the time it was made, informed by global politics, shifting definitions of masculinity and what audiences want to see in it. From Connery’s primal, rough-and-tumble fights to Craig’s brutal, Krav Maga–inflected efficiency, Bond’s battles have always stripped away the suave disguise of the gentleman spy to expose the lethal truth beneath.
Fandomfans is focusing on delivering movie details from old to new, stay connected for more updates.
Tron: Ares' box office flop stuns Hollywood. Learn why Jared Leto's passion project failed, its $33 million debut, and how it changed his career forever.
The November 2025 release of Disney’s long-awaited sequel, Tron: Ares, fizzled at the box office after a gross that trade observers called a disaster and an “IP-killing event”. The Joachim Rønning directed film made a lackluster domestic debut of $33.2 million to $33.5 million, well below its estimated opening gross by $10 million or more. The opening fell just shy of $60 million worldwide, ranging from $60.2 million to $60.5 million.
Ares not hitting the $100m mark in its opening weekend against its sizable budget made for an early and likely impossible-to-recover-from financial loss for Disney. With the failure, Report said that it is very likely that Disney will “retire the franchise from the big screen” for the foreseeable future, signaling to investors a continued reluctance to finance risky.
The box office doom of Tron: Ares, according to MovieWeb, once again raised and intensified doubts about Jared Leto’s bankability as a star who could anchor a major studio tentpole. The seeds for this industry skepticism were planted three years earlier with the collapse of Sony’s Morbius (2022).
This recurring pattern of financial failure has consolidated a trade consensus that sees Leto as an actor who can’t reliably bring in box office for similar big Intellectual Property (IP) tentpole projects. Industry reports have indicated that “the big paydays Leto received for Ares might well be over,” as studios are increasingly shying away from the actor as a dependable male star draw.
In today’s Hollywood, star viability is inexorably linked to public perception and promotability, more so for those who headline massive franchises for corporations like Disney. Leto also has considerable baggage, including several sexual misconduct allegations (which his representatives deny) that surfaced just prior to the Tron: Ares press cycle.
The allegations posed significant challenges for Disney’s marketing team, with industry executives wondering how the actor could “shoulder the pressure of selling two theatrical movies while dancing around the damning claims”. The controversies had an immediate effect on possible promotional opportunities, creating uncertainty as to whether prominent media outlets would allow him to participate in the usual press routines to help market a blockbuster, making him a major-risk.
Industry peers is also pointed out his self-serving spectacle and unprofessional distraction after his extreme behavior on set including mailing eccentric gifts to Suicide Squad co-stars or walking around on crutches for Morbius. The perceived expense of working with the actor’s process wasn’t anymore worth the result. This professional reputation of being a “pain in the ass” who wastes time, combined with his inability to open wide films makes him a uniquely risky bet for studios that want to run-efficient production and clean PR.
According to People, The flop of Tron: Ares is far more than a box office number, it’s the shattering of an actor’s sincere passion against the cold, hard financial calculations of contemporary Hollywood. For years, Jared Leto was spearheading the movie, leveraging his celebrity and producer credit, dating back to 2017, to bring Disney’s long-dormant sci-fi franchise out of development purgatory. His commitment was authentic; he was a fan of the original film and its tech, and playing the digital warrior Ares was a very personal goal for him.
Read More 👉 Kiss of the Spider Woman (2025): A Dazzling Tale of Love Create a Buzz
The broad consensus in the business is that Leto’s way out is would be to turn on a dime and not be the lead vehicle for a big-budget franchise movie. The most obvious sign of that strategic recalibration: his next role is as Skeletor in Amazon MGM’s Masters of the Universe.
Reports say, This casting is generally regarded as a potential career booster for the actor. Adopting the role of the main villain, Leto once again places the financial weight solely on the IP and the hero, enabling him to focus on crafting a memorable performance. The campy villainous role of Skeletor is a dream role for Leto, and one that lends itself perfectly to his style of transformative acting where he utilises heavy makeup and theatricality (see House of Gucci). How well this transition works will depend on his ability to strike the right balance of “menace and camp,” and keep critics away from dismissing the performance as too silly, a perception that has dogged both his Paolo Gucci and Joker performances.
Leto and his team’s main professional challenge is to manage the promotional risk. Any future promotions around the film will have to strategically separate the actor from the success of the project, downplaying those risky stunts or conversations about method acting that come from set, and instead just talk about the character and the spectacle of the film. The twin flop of Morbius and Tron: Ares have cemented that Jared Leto is simply no longer considered bankable enough to weather the scrutiny and controversy that comes with carrying a mega-budget franchise.
