The Batman: Part II brings together Matt Reeves and Emmy-winner Luke Hull to redesign Gotham City with a darker, more realistic style starring Robert Pattinson.
Matt Reeves’ hotly anticipated The Batman: Part II has reached an exciting new high with the reveal of its production designer, an Emmy-winning artist whose lineages in cinematic world-building is unparalleled. As the city of Gotham prepares for another trip to the theater, the film’s scope has been expanded to include Luke Hull, known for his revolutionary work on Disney+’s Andor and HBO’s Chernobyl.
Bringing Hull Showrunner Matt Reeves on board to direct, Reeves looks to create more grounded and immersive Gotham. According to Collider, He’s known for his meticulous attention to large, practical sets. He built entire worlds for Andor using a blend of traditional Japanese designs, minimalist Nordic styles and rugged Scottish strongholds. This fusion breathed new life into the Star Wars landscapes. His acclaimed sets for Chernobyl constructed an entire power plant. He emphasized gritty, authentic details that would add substance to the story’s emotions and themes.
Fans in DC and Star Wars communities have already been singing praises of Hull’s casting. They appreciate his knack for making locations into important characters.
Gotham is at the heart of Batman’s story. It will darken and become more deeply felt inside. Hull’s previous work indicates a city that depicts Bruce Wayne’s battle against its decay and moral drop.
Besides this major offscreen change, the film also brings back the core cast: Robert Pattinson as Batman, Colin Farrell as Oz Cobblepot/The Penguin, Jeffrey Wright as Commissioner Gordon, and Andy Serkis. Production is set to begin in January next year. The script is done.
The story begins immediately following the hit HBO max series The Penguin. It provides a consistent pace and intensity for fans of the original film and the complete Gotham narrative.
In comparing the look of The Batman to that of the forthcoming The Batman: Part II, there are notable differences in the production design, as well as in Gotham City’s artistic direction. Part II wants to take world-building even further and perhaps embrace more traditional comic book iconography while the first film is celebrated for its mood, desaturated, neo-noir look.
| The Batman (2022) | The Batman: Part II (2027) |
| Palette of Colors and Atmosphere: Muted/desaturated to the extreme on all levels, consisting of a very limited desaturated palette composed mainly by dusty deep tones with occasional pops of red, or orange. | Color Scheme and World-Building: There will be deeper colours, with more shades, but a dark intention. This is the plain and old-fashioned places of Hull. Gotham’s architecture will be more defined: There will be windows, and roofs on some of the buildings, as CBR says. |
| Cinematography: A close, tactile camera feel was achieved through the use of Arri ALFA lenses. It focused on harsh reality and silhouette imagery a-la Roger Deakins. | Visual Ideas: Initial discussions on Reddit are that the next movie will be even more strongly influenced by vintage Batman comics. There are also shots of him on gargoyles and grand, bold scenes. The camera is close and intimate but non-pornographic. |
| Urban Environment: The streets always appeared wet, to suggest perpetual rain and a somber mood. The city pressed down hard and felt harsh. Night scenes gave Gotham a gritty feel and Bruce Wayne’s secretive nature. | Production Designer Swap: Andor and Chernobyl’s Luke Hull takes over duties from James Chinlund. Everything He Touches Turns to Real, Physical Space He excels at creating real, tangible, physical worlds, with sets you can touch. This transformation gives a whole new perspective to the buildings, and overall feel, in Gotham. |
| Symbolism: It conveyed desolation and little optimism, at times portraying Batman as a creature of the darkness. Warm orange from the flares lightened the colors only in a few places, such as the end. This was hope arising out of loss. | Comic Tribute: Sequel looks to snatch iconic comic book panels for Batman’s look. That against the muted truth of the first film in picked classic poses. |
| Riffing: Some of your crew spots may change, but Matt Reeves keeps close-to-the-vest stories and tailspin tone. Hull’s elegant set pieces will elevate it. |
In Short, The Batman is distinguished by its muted colors, wet surfaces, and urban stress forged in shadows.
The Batman: Part II is to expand upon Gotham’s style through Luke Hull’s immersive, practical sets. It could be a tribute to vintage comic illustrations too. This gives a fresh spin which remains just as moody for the cape-wearing hero.
The fact that Matt Reeves went out and hired Luke Hull means that Matt Reeves wants literally every person in Gotham to be filled with the inner pain and dark thoughts that is at the core of Batman’s world. Hull has demonstrated that he can make locations come to life on the page in stories such as Star Wars’ Chandrila or the Chernobyl plant, where setting is integral to plot.
His Gothamville is in decline and ready to roar on October 1, 2027 as the making of the film starts in 2026. The Batman: Part II holds the promise of a film trip that the long wait will make all too right.
Read More 👉 Die My Love: Jennifer Lawrence & Robert Pattinson’s New Film
Welcome to FandomFans — your source for the latest buzz from Hollywood’s creative underworld. Here, we explore the art of filmmaking, knowing about how visionary directors, designers, and actors shape the worlds we escape into. Today we break down Matt Reeves’ ambitious direction for The Batman: Part II, Emmy-winner Luke Hull (Andor, Chernobyl) steps in to reinvent Gotham’s shadowy skyline for its next cinematic evolution.
‘The Mandalorian and Grogu’ will bring Star Wars back to theaters in 2026. Discover how Lucasfilm is redefining marketing, budgeting and fan expectations.
Star Wars’ return to the cinema should have felt like a galactic coronation. With the countdown to the release of The Mandalorian and Grogu (May 22, 2026) now well underway, here comes something rather unexpected — confusion.
It was a seven-year gap on the big screen, so people were expecting a “shock and awe” campaign. What they received in Super Bowl LX was a 30-second parody of a Budweiser commercial narrated by Sam Elliott’s gravelly voice that features Tauntauns pulling a sled. It was bold, it was weird, and it signaled a massive change in how Lucasfilm treats its most precious cargo.
Usually a $10 million Super Bowl spot is spent displaying “heavy artillery” — explosions, high-stakes drama and cinematic scale. Instead of a third wall-smashing joke, director Jon Favreau and new leadership team of Dave Filoni and Lynwen Brennan didn’t just shatter the mold; they pretended it didn’t exist.
The commercial, “A New Journey Begins,” indulged full-force in “Comfort Marketing.” Rather than treating the movie as “there’s mythology behind everything, and you have to do your homework” (a common critique of the Sequel Trilogy era), the ad treated the characters as old friends. It puts its chips on the notion that Grogu is a worldwide icon who doesn’t need a plot summary to sell a ticket — he just needs to make people smile.
Industry watchers have been quick to note the “Solo-esque” red flags. Like 2018’s Solo: A Star Wars Story, this movie has a May release date and a somewhat late marketing push. But the internal economics are another story:
A global take of $500 million would have made The Mandalorian and Grogu a massive success, but it would have been a flop for The Rise of Skywalker. The marketing department was allowed to be “bizarre” about the Super Bowl this year on account of the diminished financial burden.
It’s also the creative debut for Dave Filoni. Filoni, the master of “deep cuts” into Star Wars lore, has brought a surprising cast to the table:
Read More 👉 Once Upon a Time in Hollywood: A Love Letter to a Bygone Era (and What Comes Next!)
The Mandalorian and Grogu Star Wars fans expecting as much darkness as Dune will probably find the “Budweiser Parody” off-key. But it is a reminder to the wider world that this franchise can be enjoyable.
Lucasfilm is betting that audiences are ready for a Space Western that values character over complexity after years of galaxy-ending crises. This May will tell if this “confusing” strategy works or ends up as a cautionary tale like Solo. With Sam Elliott narrating and a “swole” Hutt, one thing is certain: this isn’t the Star Wars of 2019. Something much more human.
Fandomfans delivers the latest updates from celebrities, movies and web series to catch up with your favorite characters.
Gosling joins Star Wars Starfighter Obey your thirst. Discover how the Gosling-Levy pairing might reshape the genre of space opera when it arrives in 2027.
There is a strange buzz that fills the air when Ryan Gosling appears on set. It’s not the orchestrated buzz of a marketing strategy, it’s the quiet assurance of a performer who knows that film is as much about what you don’t say as what you do. When Gosling was officially announced to be joining Star Wars Starfighter with Shawn Levy at Star Wars Celebration Tokyo in April 2025, the news was more than a simple casting win for Lucasfilm. It was something far more fragile: a possible course correction for a franchise that’s been failing for focus for the better part of a decade.
The Rise of Skywalker ended the Skywalker Saga, and since then, Star Wars has felt less like one shared universe and the galaxy has become multiple tossed captains in the ship. But “The Mandalorian and Grogu” restored faith and The Book Boba Fett got things all mixed up, Andor demonstrated maturity and seriousness in Star Wars storytelling, and The Acolyte explained how far off that can fly.
Through it all, one question looms over Kathleen Kennedy’s leadership: what the hell is Star Wars Starfighter in 2027?
Now, enter the Gosling–Levy pair — not so much a studio double feature as two filmmakers connected by the same childhood dreams and creative vision, returning with something that actually feels personal once again.
Here we’re getting into speculation, Star Wars Starfighter focuses on Gosling as not a smuggler, not a Jedi, but a very real trader in an uncle outraged into protecting his Force-sensitive nephew from dark side hunters in a galaxy still recovering from Palpatine’s final death, in which Amy Adams is said to be the boy’s mother, and possibly a Jedi herself who gives her brother (Gosling) the son’s protection as she goes to meet the galactic threats elsewhere.
If this is the case and screenwriter Jonathan Tropper has been as characteristically tight-lipped as always then this setup is genius in its simplicity. For four decades, Star Wars has weighed fathers and sons, masters and apprentices, the burden of blood and destiny. An uncle-nephew relationship allows for a genuinely horizontal dynamic: chosen responsibility as opposed to inherited burden. Gosling wouldn’t be wrestling with the sins of his father—he’d be leaping into danger for love of his sister and her child.
This turns the whole hero’s journey on its head. Luke Skywalker became a legend because of who his father was. Gosling’s character, let’s call him Kael for the sake of our theory, would be a hero for who he chooses to be. That has a very modern ring to it, in a time when a found family often trumps blood ties.
There’s another theory made that mentioned by CBR that’s worthy of your attention, one which links Star Wars Starfighter to the wider weave of today’s Star Wars narrative.
Baylan Skoll references the Bokken Jedi in Ahsoka, Force users who trained outside of the Now I’m watching Ahsoka. They are survivors, self-made warriors who cobbled together knowledge from legends, ancient holocrons, and fragments of lore rather than being expert practitioners. Crude, authentic, and defined by loss rather than tradition.
But what if Baylan is one of them? A former student of Luke Skywalker’s temple who escaped Ben Solo’s massacre — someone who saw friends die, chose survival over heroism, and vanished rather than standing and fighting. That kind of background would explain everything about who he is now. Five years Post-Exegol, the galaxy doesn’t need another chosen one. It needs a broken man who relearns how “to be whole” by protecting someone else.
That would explain the “Star Wars Starfighter” titles even better than a simple aesthetic reason. He is flying a starfighter, literally, because he is on the run. Now action sequences become character beats — every evasive dive through an asteroid field isn’t just spectacle, it’s a man dodging his past until he can no longer. The ship becomes a metaphor: run-down, cobbled together, but still capable of amazing things when properly captained.
Shawn Levy, the director of the new Star Wars movie is really important to this equation. Levy is not a visionary auteur in the conventional sense. He’s not Denis Villeneuve drawing with shadows and silence, or Christopher Nolan stretching time like taffy.
Levy’s talent is subtler, and perhaps more challenging: He makes tentpole movies feel intimate. Free Guy shouldn’t have worked as a comedy about an NPC gaining self-awareness in a video game that sounds like algorithmic nightmare fuel. And yet Levy injected it with such happy earnestness that even Ryan Reynolds’ blue-shirted everyman seemed worth rooting for.
Then there was Deadpool & Wolverine, and that could’ve been a cynical IP soup concoction. But Levy approached Wolverine’s mourning with sincere respect all the while delivering the R-rated mayhem fans desired. He understands that the most successful blockbusters function on two or three different frequencies simultaneously: the visual, emotional and, in the case of the sense of irreverent humor.
For Star Wars Starfighter, this approach is just right - it’s fun without feeling like a drag and you get a sense of accomplishment for each stage you complete. The sequel series always felt embarrassed to be Star Wars, constantly trying to upend expectations until there were none left to upend.
Levy is not a subversion, he is an embrace. He’ll give us the trench run homage, the cantina scene, the binary sunset moment – he’ll give us all of those things, but he’ll earn them through character work rather than nostalgia triggers.
Star Wars Starfighter movie appearance five years after The Rise of Skywalker is something that builds hope to open up interesting story possibilities while closing others.
This is a galaxy being rebuilt. The New Republic that was decapitated by the destruction of Hosnian Prime that the First Order killed is either in the process of rebuilding or has fractured into various regional powers. The First Order’s remnants haven’t simply vanished but they’ve likely sprouted as warlords, marauders, or desperate holdouts.
And the Jedi? Rey is probably off training her first students somewhere, but the Force-sensitive populace hasn’t suddenly exploded in size. If anything, parents are likely keeping their children’s talents under wraps, taking heed of how the last regime treated “Force-wielding terrorists.
As IGN mentioned, This adds poignancy to Gosling’s role as the overprotective uncle. He’s not just running from dark side hunters, he’s trying to navigate a hideous bureaucratic system in which signing up a Force-sensitive kid for school could very well be handing him or her over to a government that wants to stop another Palpatine. The film might delve into the paranoia of the post-war generation, the way its trauma reverberated through organizations even after it won.
There’s also the prospect of legacy characters turning up that don’t overwhelm the story. Daisy Ridley’s Rey makes a cameo not as a savior, but as a distant hope, a legend that Kael doesn’t believe in until she sees for herself. The Starfighter vs. the sequel trilogy, however, would be scale: Rey is not the main character in this one, She’s not in this world, She’s is in another dimension, a parallel story.
What interesting is about the path Ryan Gosling’s career has taken. He’s also one of the few actors to flex his star power between indie bona fides (The Nice Guys, Blade Runner 2049, First Man) and blockbuster draw (Barbie, La La Land) without ever really feeling like he’s slumming in either realm. He has never led a franchise this large, this culturally laden.
There’s danger here. Star Wars has chewed up bright futures before, just look at the Solo cast, or the skilled actors buried beneath sequel trilogy exposition. But there’s also an unprecedented opportunity. If Starfighter works, Gosling doesn’t just get one big movie, he gets ownership of a new corner of the galaxy.
Gosling is the right age for this at 46 as he can convey gravitas, yet be around for multiple films, and is savvy enough to know when to fight for creative input.
But more than that, he adds an element of the audience that doesn’t usually think about Star Wars. The Barbie crowd, the Drive lovers, the Oscar-season crowd who tip it to his nominations, they will come to this galaxy, enlarging the base beyond the faithful who gauge midi-chlorian counts on Reddit.
In January 2026, screenwriter Jonathan Tropper made a comment that should have attracted more attention:
“Star Wars Starfighter is truly standalone, there are no secret cameos from legacy characters. Interview In a day and age where all blockbusters are secretly backdoor pilots for ten other projects, this is radical.”
What that means is the film has to be able to stand on its own. You don’t just play John Williams’ Force Theme to make you cry, you have to earn it through new themes. It can’t just take the outline of Darth Vader to create menace — it must introduce new villains (Matt Smith and Mia Goth, according to casting rumours) that feel as iconic. This is Lucasfilm betting on storytelling over brand recognition, and that confidence is contagious.
It’s not trying to sound legendary — it’s practical, almost humble. A name that can function as a job, a vehicle, and just a way to get around, instead of a symbol burdened with the weight of mythology. It implies a movie about people at work—hazardous, urgent work rather than destiny congealing in the veins.
If Star Wars Starfighter is successful as early executive reactions indicate that it could rewrite the Star Wars rule book entirely. No more trilogies in the works before the first film debut. No more mystery boxes that go nowhere. Just filmmakers with passion projects, actors with real chemistry, and stories that just happen to take place in space.
For Ryan Gosling, success means showing that he can bear the impossible load of fan expectations and still come out on the other side as a fully realised artist. For Shawn Levy, it’s proof that his particular brand of warm-hearted blockbuster filmmaking can survive in the most closely parsed sandbox in cinema. What they really want is for the original 1977 Star Wars to feel real again — not because of twists or surprises or retcons, but because that film had heart. And it made people feel, and that’s what we haven’t had.
Speculation, set visits and Star Wars Starfighter trailer dissections over the past 18 months have been propelled by that one hope that Star Wars will discover its soul again. Release was then scheduled for May 28, 2027, for the new film. But in years now, that excitement really does feel deserved rather than manufactured. Because somewhere in a London editing suite, Ryan Gosling is learning to fly, and the galaxy is at last becoming large enough for new stories once again.
Dive into the world of cinema with Fandomfans to get deeper updates from upcoming movies, series and celebrities.
