Welcome to Derry : Makes the Same Horror Mistake That Nearly Killed the Franchise
Welcome to Derry Review repeats IT Chapter Two’s biggest horror mistake, choosing CGI spectacle over psychological terror that once made Pennywise truly frightening.
Welcome to Derry Review repeats IT Chapter Two’s biggest horror mistake, choosing CGI spectacle over psychological terror that once made Pennywise truly frightening.
When IT: Welcome to Derry aired on HBO at the end of 2024, fans of the genre thought it was going to be a new version of Stephen King’s horrifying world. But in its opening episode, the series offered something else — a very familiar (and not in a good way) experience. The very thing that made IT (2017) a triumph is what turns the prequel’s opening moments into a warning: the misapplication of horror principles that plagued IT: Chapter Two. And if you’re wondering where things went haywire, strap in — because it’s a lesson the franchise should have gotten the first time around.
“Young Matty Clements” The Original Story begins on the night of a snowstorm, a boy called Matty Clements running from his abusive father with nothing else but hope, young Matty Clements. He is taken in by a seemingly warm family, and for a fleeting moment the audience experiences genuine relief for him. Then everything goes horribly wrong. A grotesque, computer generated, winged thing explodes out of the car in a welter of blood. It’s supposed to echo Georgie’s death in the original movie — a chilling first taste of Pennywise’s real form. But here is the problem: it couldn’t be more wrong.
Compare with Georgie’s’s iconic death in IT (2017). Director Andy Muschietti choreographed that scene with surgical precision. Bill Skarsgård’s Pennywise was this chillingly intimate, yet threateningly expansive. The Georgie and clown talk gained genuine dread through conversation and psychology rather than spectacle. Every second seemed well-earned, every shock felt intimate. Pennywise took advantage of Georgie’s particular weakness — his faith in strangers, his wish to get back his boat. That’s efficient terror.”
That’s when it gets frustrating. IT: Chapter Two (2019) in particular was derided for eschewing the psychological horror that made the 1990 version so effective. The sequel padded itself out with a two-hour-and-forty-nine-minute running time, repetitive solo missions for every Loser Club member, and most damningly a dependence on cartoonish CGI monster moments. Critics were not shy about it—the attack on the Paul Bunyan statue, the grotesquerie creature designs, the visual spectacle that is not actually scary. It was like someone told the filmmakers: Bigger means better, and they darted off blindly downhill.
Chapter Two’s Rotten Tomatoes rating fell 23 points from the original. Box office receipts plummeted by more than $230 million. The message from the crowd was plain: we don’t want spectacle, we want atmosphere.
So what Welcome to Derry accomplishes in its first few minutes? It’s the exact same error. That demon baby on the fly, that horrific beast bursting out of the family vehicle, the extended gore set piece — it’s all Chapter Two’s playbook, dusted off and amazon prime-ready. The scene goes on uncomfortably long, giving up slow-building suspense for cheap scares.The winged creature reappears at the end of the episode and that moment works better narratively, though it can still not come close to the real terror of the opening of the original film.
Read More 👉 Fallout Season 2 Episode 2 Breakdown: Shady Sands’ Death & the Mojave’s Brutal New Rules
This isn’t just one badly staged scene. It’s a matter of philosophy.” IT worked because it knew something fundamental: Pennywise is scariest when horror feels close and personal. The warped Judith painting that plagues Stan, the leper that represents Eddie’s hypochondria, Georgie’s guilt-induced visions — these are mental terrors sculpted around each character’s unique fears.
Welcome to Derry had the formula for greatness. It was allowed to roam in the characters, new traumas, and the societal canvas of ’60s Derry, free from the constraints of a single Stephen King novel. It got a chance to fix Chapter Two’s mistakes. Instead, it fell all over itself, hurrying for a big monster moment without cultivating the mood of dread that makes Pennywise really scary.
Welcome to Derry has already made beats of learning this lesson in later episodes. Hallucination sequences customized to characters’ fears, atmosphere-building scenes using lighting and suspense, and sequences that prey on mental fragility have far outperformed those big CGI set pieces.
If the show continues on this path – sacrificing spectacle to pummel us with character-specific horror – maybe it’ll break its cycle for once. Because the big lesson isn’t that bigger is better. It’s that personal psychological terror will always stand the test of time over a computer-generated creature, no matter how cool it looks on screen.
IT: Welcome to Derry doesn’t come up short for lack of concepts, it wavers because it abandons what made IT so terrifying to begin with. The franchise was at its weakest when Pennywise ballooned into giant CGI monstrosities; it was at its best when fear tiptoed in silently, cloaked in guilt, trauma, and anxieties so personal they couldn’t be named. Instead of building suspense, the series starts with spectacle in what briefly amounts to the exact mistake that undermined IT: Chapter Two.
That’s not to say the show is irredeemable. Its succeeding episodes point to a more comprehensive approach to psychological horror derived from building atmosphere, character-based dread and the gradual disintegration of safety. If Welcome to Derry keeps playing to those strengths, it can still do right by Stephen King’s legacy instead of watering it down. Because Pennywise, at the end of the day, does not need wings, or blood sprays, or extra run time in order to be frightening — he just needs to get close enough to whisper.
Dive deeper into the cinematic world with Fandomfans to get all the details from your favorite genre.
XO, Kitty’s drama is irresistible! Romance, secrets & identity struggles make this Netflix spin-off binge-worthy. Discover why fans can’t get enough!
Netflix is known for its campy teen dramas. XO, Kitty is a To All the Boys I’ve Loved Before spin-off. This show has gone on to be one of Netflix’s most binge-watched series. It has exciting characters and complex love stories.
It keeps you glued to the screen with unexpected turns. People worldwide are into it. What is so special about XO, Kitty? Why do people of all ages like it? There must be something magical about this show. Let’s see why XO, Kitty has captivated so many people!
XO, Kitty stands out as a new story that lives up to the To All the Boys I’ve Loved Before charm. It combines the familiar with the unexpected to create a narrative that’s warm and thrilling. The series centers around Kitty Song Covey, portrayed by Anna Cathcart. She is Lara Jean’s little sister. Kitty embarks on her own journey of love and self-discovery.
Her journey leads her to Seoul, South Korea. She enrolls at the Korean Independent School of Seoul (KISS). Her late mother also attended. This new locale introduces cultural adventure. It allows Kitty to break out of her sister’s shadow. Now she has the opportunity to carve out her own path.
Once We Were Slaves at the heart of XO, Kitty is a love story. But it isn’t a straightforward one. Kitty goes to Seoul to meet up with her boyfriend, Dae. She’s excited to see him, again. But she gets a surprise when she arrives at KISS. Dae is staging a fake relationship with the principal’s daughter, Yuri.
Yuri is actually in love with her girlfriend, Juliana. Dae assists Yuri in keeping their relationship a secret. The effect is to add drama and thrill. Kitty conflicts with her emotions for Dae. However, she also begins to fall for Yuri.
She starts to have doubts about who she is. Hers is an emotional and powerful journey of self-discovery. The series addresses bisexuality in an honest, meaningful way. This extra layer adds depth and authenticity to the story. And it resonates with viewers who value diverse experiences.
XO, Kitty is not simply a romantic comedy. It’s also about identity, family and grief. Kitty does not attend KISS just for Dae. She’s also looking for her deceased mother. She attends the same school as her mother did to connect to her mother more deeply in an attempt to learn more about where she came from and their history together.
At KISS, she discovers shocking truths about her mom, unraveling what had been the very fabric of her family and what she thought was real. They leave her struggling with a new reality, and how she sees her past. This trip rounds out the emotional content of the story. It’s hotter than your average teen romance. The series also touches on cultural issues.
Kitty (Khloé Kardashian) is an American who encounters a myriad of challenges in South Korea. Language barriers and unfamiliar customs make living difficult for her. She needs to adapt and evolve. Her experiences lead her to question her own ideology. She discovers things about herself she never would have expected to know.
They seem authentic and enjoyable to relate to. Anna Cathcart is the right Kitty. She captures Kitty’s vivacity, humor, and vulnerability. Audiences delight in watching her evolve.
The rest of the cast have distinct characters and stories. Yuri is enigmatic, layered. Min Ho is charming and kind. Q is devoted and dependable. Even apparent villains have layers. Dae isn’t just an adversary – he’s fighting his own battles.
All of the characters feel real, and it’s all as important as the main character’s experience. There’s no one who’s just a background character. This robust character development has viewers invested. They’re invested in everyone’s story. The show ensures that every student at KISS gets a story of some kind. That’s why people won’t stop watching.
It’s not surprising that a second season of XO, Kitty was confirmed. The ground floor season has already made it to the top of the trending charts and Netflix is giving an early renewal. In season 2, there is more drama, more romance, more shocks are promised. Kitty returns to KISS for a further term. She’s going to school, this time.
But love gets in the way, as always. She still loves Yuri. Yuri, however, currently resides with his girlfriend, Juliana. This complicates matters even more. Praveena, a new student, takes over at KISS. Kitty dates her to try to get over Yuri. Meanwhile, Min Ho’s affection for Kitty intensifies.
Dae also has a hard time moving on from their break-up. New love and old feelings collide. All are tangled up in love and heartbreak. With so many twists and turns, The Reckoning season 2 keeps fans glued. This season is going to be even more fun and surprising!
What’s addicting about XO, Kitty? Plenty of elements in this series that keep the fans glued to the screen. Some of them are as follows:
XO, Kitty is not a teen drama. It’s a Love, identity, and family coming of age story. The characters are real and the plots are thrilling. You can tell it’s going to be addictive from the get-go. It also runs risks and plumbs emotional depths.
It’s a difference that makes it stand out from other teen shows. Whether you are a fan of the Boys or you just want to see what all the fuss is about, this show is definitely worth the watch.
Stay connected with Fandomfans for more updates on your favorite character analysis and unique storylines.
The Last of Us Season 3 faces major changes as Danny Ramirez exits amid Marvel conflicts, creative departures, and a bold Abby-centric shift.
HBO’s The Last of Us has always been willing to shock its viewers, but the latest between the scenes twist might just be its biggest surprise yet. As fans were preparing for a daring, Abby-centric Season 3, we learned that Danny Ramirez is no longer with the series. The unexpected recasting of Manny, one of Season 2’s most charming side characters, has sparked major discussion across fandoms. From the increasing influence of Marvel to significant talent departures, The Last of Us Season 3 is set to mark a new era for the critically acclaimed HBO drama.
That’s where it gets interesting. The recasting is not because of creative differences or contract disputes — it’s a flat out scheduling conflict. And while HBO never actually said what took Ramirez away, the Internet sleuthing points directly to Marvel. The actor is going to be in Avengers: Doomsday and maybe Avengers: Secret Wars, two of the biggest film projects looming out there.
Contemplate that for a moment. The Last of Us is genuinely one of the best reviewed shows on television right now. It’s a greasy prestige HBO drama based on a cherished video game series. And here we are, being forced to say goodbye to a gifted actor to the gravitational pull of the MCU. It’s a testament to just how much star power Marvel has in Hollywood — even if it means losing key players to major productions.
It’s wild because Ramirez isn’t leaving in a vacuum. Season 3 is already shaping up to be a bit of a behind-the scenes shift. Co-creator Neil Druckmann, the creative mind behind the original video games, stepped away from writing and directing duties earlier this year to work on Naughty Dog’s new project, Intergalactic: The Heretic Prophet. And writer Halley Gross, who was instrumental in Season 2 narrative, has also left to pursue other opportunities.
So showrunner and co-creator Craig Mazin is essentially left to write Season 3 by his lonesome. Now, Mazin has demonstrated that he can bear the burden (he’s been the lead writer throughout), but there’s no denying that losing these creative heavyweights is big.
Lost star Jorge Garcia and character Dharma Initiative worker Desmond Hume are still set to make an appearance. Season 3 is shifting its narrative entirely to Kaitlyn Dever’s character, Abby—a radical storytelling choice the show’s creators confirmed all the way back in mid-2025. Manny, after all, was a supporting character in Abby’s journey, not the star.
Manny’s buoyant spirit influenced by his internal pain was one of the highlights of Season 2, and recasting that role is no small feat. Fans have already started to speculate about candidates to fill those shoes, and the heat is definitely on for HBO to get someone who can deliver.
All of this speaks to something bigger shaping Hollywood right now the tension between high-end content television and blockbuster cinema. When giant Marvel projects beckon, they can pull talent away from even the most prestigious series. It’s a testament to how cutthroat the entertainment business is.
That said, The Last of Us has survived tempests before. The series adapted incredibly well from an incredibly loved work and was able to form something that stands on its own. If there is a team that can go through a recasting and creative restructuring, this is the one.
Season 3 remains one of the most anticipated television events on the horizon. Is this recasting going to matter the great scheme of things? Possibly not. But yet it’s also a stark reminder that no show, no matter how enormous, is immune to Hollywood’s caprice.
Read More:- Welcome to Derry : Makes the Same Horror Mistake That Nearly Killed the Franchise
The Last of Us : At its essence, the Danny Ramirez recasting debacle reveals an increasingly common reality brewing beneath the surface of Hollywood: not even the most highbrow television series are safe from the blockbuster franchise gravitational pull. With Marvel poaching another rising star and core creatives walking away, The Last of Us Season 3 undoubtedly faces challenges — but also the rare chance to reinvent itself.
HBO’s survival horror masterpiece has already demonstrated its staying power, making a cherished video game into essential television. Whether this casting revision ends up as a minor point or a highlight will only be revealed when/if Season 3 arrives. One thing is for sure — the world of The Last of Us is as volatile off-screen as it is in the story.
Fandomfans delivers the latest updates from movies, web series, and celebrities. Stay connected for more getting every detail!