Priyanka Chopra Jonas’ ‘The Bluff’ Inspired From The Real Life Pirate Queens

Priyanka Chopra Jonas’ The Bluff draws inspiration from real pirate queens like Grace O’Malley, Anne Bonny, and Ching Shih.

Published: January 9, 2026, 12:10 pm

Hollywood’s depiction of a woman pirate was, for many years, a romanticized caricature-a corseted sidekick or the occasional option roguish lead surrounded by familiar hearth and home arcs. But as we get ready to see Priyanka Chopra Jonas step into the shoes of Ercell Bodden in The Bluff, the narrative is at long last shifting.

As anyone who bothers to look at history will tell you, women pirates didn’t just “go along for the ride.” These were ruthless, calculating, and sometimes more horrifying malevolent forces than the men they led. Chopra Jonas’s take on Ercell, a woman who must reclaim her “warrior identity,” and is inspired by four legendary women who genuinely ruled the waves. 

1. Grace O’Malley: The Maternal Force

If Ercell Bodden is defined by her “maternal ferocity,” she rests on the foundation of Grace O’Malley. But not only was O’Malley a pirate who had come to command a fleet at a title that made her the “Pirate Queen of Connacht,” she was the ruler of an empire.

Grace O’Malley

She reportedly gave birth on a ship and was back on deck a few hours later armed with a blunderbuss to help defend her men. Like Ercell, O’Malley was never really a greedy pirate – it was just about staving off hunger for her family and people. She even had a famous confrontation with Queen Elizabeth I, dispelling the myth that a pirate couldn’t be a canny political operator and a mother at the same time.  

2. Anne Bonny & Mary Read: The Feral Energy

In The Bluff, we witness Ercell’s transformation from a deadly assassin to a suburban mom and the violent “unmasking” that follows. This is in the lives of Anne Bonny and Mary Read.

Anne Bonny & Mary Read

These 18th century pirates spent much of their lives passing as men, making their way in a world that offered them no place at the table. In the heat of battle they were said to be more “bloodthirsty” than the males. They are the “feral” energy Ercell must recapture to defend her home. 

3. Ching Shih: The Tactical Commander

While Ercell battles on behalf of a tiny community in the Cayman Islands, her tactical prowess is a mirror image of Ching Shih (Madame Cheng). As the admiral of the Red Flag Fleet consisting of 1,500 ships and 80,000 pirates—Shih was perhaps the most prosperous pirate ever.

Ching Shih

Significantly, she is also one of the few who actually managed to “retire” and live to tell the tale. That is the essential tension at the center of The Bluff: Ercell has found her peace, but as Ching Shih knew, your past is a shadow that never quite goes away. 

4. Jacquotte Delahaye: The Resurrection

Referred to as “Back from the Dead Red,” the biography of Jacquotte Delahaye is survival at its highest degree. faked her death to get away from the government, and then came back to the water with a vengeance.

Jacquotte Delahaye

This motif of “reanimation” is at The Bluff’s heart. Ercell is essentially “dead” to her former life until the wicked Captain Connor arrives and she must once again embrace her warrior spirit. 

Feature Historical Reality The Bluff (2026)
Weaponry Improvised, heavy, and practical. Conch shells, tactical traps, and “dirty” fighting.
Motivation Political autonomy and family. Maternal ferocity and redemption.
Outcome Usually a short life or a quiet exile. A focused, muscular 101-minute survival arc.

Conclusion

The Bluff is more than just a survival thriller, it’s a celebration of women who survived against the odds in the face of the unforgiving ocean. Priyanka Chopra Jonas gives a portrayal that bleeds into fiction of the fiercest women in history. 

Dive deeper into the world of Fandomfans, a platform where you can get the stories of inspiration behind the character

Babita

Articles Published : 25

Babita is Fandomfans Editor, experience in managing content. Her focus in general movies and web series. She is having a deep interest in TV shows and 90s movies - particularly Lord of the Rings, Harry Potter, & Rom-Com. Babita also covers psychological thrillers and major releases in current time and concern with deep interest in them.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

‘Wake Up Dead Man’ Review: A Bold Mystery but Missing the Knives Out Spark

"Wake Up Dead Man review: Superb performances and a bold storyline, but this Knives Out follow-up lacks the complex twists of the originals." Learn more..!

Written by: Mariyam
Published: November 27, 2025, 12:45 pm
Wake Up Dead Man Review

The late 2025 launch of Wake Up Dead Man: A Knives Out Mystery is a high-stakes moment for one of the greatest IPs in modern moviemaking. Taking its place as the crown jewel amongst writer-director Rian Johnson’s body of work, the Knives Out franchise hasn’t simply breathed new life into the “whodunit” genre, it has transformed it into a tool for sharp social commentary, adapting the warm tropes of Agatha Christie to unpack the unsettling realities of 21st-century American class relations. 

Coming off the sleeper theatrical success of Knives Out (2019) and the opulent, streaming-centered cultural moment of Glass Onion (2022), this third entry arrives with the weight of an inherently high-stakes legacy and the burdensome $450 million payday by Netflix. 

Although the film has received overwhelmingly positive ratings—for example, it currently has a Rotten Tomatoes rating of 96% to 100% in the wake of its premiere at the Toronto International Film Festival—a close read of the reviews reveals a series struggling to find new energy in its satirical bite and its narrative mechanics. 

The biggest departure in Wake Up Dead Man and the cause of most critical dissent is its bold structure. Johnson seeks to destabilize the standard whodunit paradigm not in the question of who did it, but in the mode of storytelling. 

Bold Structural Shift: Blanc Arrives Too Late

Everything has been turned on its head in what is being called a “subversive” and “harmful” marketing move: The franchise centerpiece, Benoit Blanc (Daniel Craig), does not show up until the 45-minute mark. This decision in narrative style changes the whole DNA of the whodunit. 

Bold Structural Shift
Image credit: IMDb

The movie devotes its whole first act to introducing the “victim,” Monsignor Jefferson Wicks (Josh Brolin), and the main protagonist/suspect, Father Jud Duplenticy (Josh O’Connor). The viewer is so deeply ensconced in the personalities of the Chimney Rock group, the history of the church and even the philosophical divide between Jud and Wicks that the arrival of law enforcement feels intrusive. The point of this construction is to give the mystery an emotional charge — the murder is not simply a brainteaser, but a tragedy involving characters the audience has come to know. 

Reviewers said the first two reels of the film are slow. By the time the detective, Blanc, finally makes his appearance, most of the puzzles are already set on the table, so he’s not quite as active and important as he was in previous entries. He’s more like a “buddy cop” partner to Father Jud than the main engine of the narrative.

Blanc arriving
Image credit: IMDb

With Blanc arriving so late, the first act becomes a drama — nicely acted, but lacking the strong mystery “hook” that normally pulls audience in. That’s why they thought it was “far too long” to get truly started. 

Classic Locked-Room Mystery With Predictable Twists

The movie borrows from a classic play, “the locked room” mystery, in which a murder takes place inside a church during a service and only the congregants could be suspects. The premise is entertaining — a seemingly impossible murder with no weapon or assailant in sight, inspired by old-school authors like John Dickson Carr. 

Reviewers enjoyed the classic Christie-style tone, but many thought the answer was both a little too complex and still too easy to guess. Since the killer could be identified by the audience rather early on, the mystery was not very surprising and some considered the film to have lost the unpredictable energy that made the previous Knives Out films so exciting. 

The film’s primary antagonist Monsignor Wicks is a gaunt, terrorized priest who wields religion as a tool of oppression, placing him among the more blatant political extremism and faith abuse in the stacked deck of the film. The movie even sets him up against the gentler Father Jud to illustrate the difference between poisonous institutions and real spirituality. But many reviewers found the satire too on the nose and “safe.” 

The portrayal of Wicks is made so blatantly villainous that the satire feels toothless and uninspired, especially when compared to the cutting, dangerous satire of the earlier Knives Out films. It makes the criticism feel routine and less hard-hitting. 

Read More  👉  An Exhaustive Strategic and Narrative Analysis of Eva Green’s Casting in Wednesday Season 3 

Bigger Scale, But Less Sharp Writing

Reviews say the movie is bigger than Knives Out but not as sharp as Glass Onion, and many feel it doesn’t have the tight, focused writing of the first film. It also plays it safe, leaning on well-worn mystery tropes rather than attempting to surprise or outsmart its audience

Bigger Scale, But Less Sharp Writing

Although the storyline can appear to be baffling at the beginning, the twists are quite predictable, which causes the mystery to be foreseeable and less emotional. Without a clever, mind blowing reveal, the ending just feels mundane. 

Conclusion

Wake Up Dead Man is a “safe” triumph—a film that refines the form but loses the anarchic, punk-rock energy that made Knives Out a sensation. It’s a mystery that insists on being watched for its craft, if not one that will be viewed again and again as its antecedents have been. 

Moving forward with the franchise, Johnson has a choice— he can continue his journey toward introspection and “cinema,” or he can come back to the tight, aggressive storytelling that made the original a searing experience. The “Knives” may still be out, but this time, they seem a little less sharp. 

Fandomfans is an entertainment source which delivers consistently every movie reviews analysis and audience reception for a Wake Up Dead Man movie.

Mariyam

Articles Published : 65

Mariyam Khan is Fandomfans Content Writer and providing reports and reviews on Movie Celebrities, and Superheroes particularly Marvel & DC. She is covering across multiple genres from more than 4+ years, experience in delivering the timely updates.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

From Kang to Doomsday: Unpacking the MCU’s Phase 6 Revolution

Marvel shocks fans by firing Jonathan Majors and replacing Kang with Robert Downey Jr.’s Doctor Doom in Avengers: Doomsday. MCU Phase 6 reimagined!

Written by: Alpana
Published: October 1, 2025, 8:05 am

The MCU underwent one of its biggest back-end shakeups in recent memory, with massive ramifications for not only the direction of Phase 6 but the entire Multiverse Saga. What started as a grand design revolving around Kang the Conqueror has shifted into an entirely different story, with Doctor Doom emerging as the main Villain.

Jonathan Majors and the Fall of Kang

The change began with dire legal problems for Jonathan Majors, who was set to be the MCU’s next big villain after Thanos. In March 2023, Majors was taken into custody on charges of assault and harassment against his ex-girlfriend Grace Jabbari. The matter intensified when in December 2023 he was convicted by a New York jury of reckless assault and second-degree harassment, The Guardians stated.

Marvel Studios’ Toughest Decision Yet

Marvel Studios fired Jonathan Majors just hours after his conviction to be charged with assault and harassment in his ex-girlfriend’s case associated their charges Jonathan Majors was facing a similar hammer blow to his career as the next MCU big bad villain after Thanos. The actor had already played multiple Kang variants in Loki seasons 1 and 2, and Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania. His termination presented a monumental storytelling issue for Marvel, as Kang was supposed to be the overarching menace throughout Phases 4, 5 and 6.

A New Overarching Villain Emerges

The consequences of Majors’ termination were much more than the removal of a single actor. Marvel entirely dropped the Kang-centric plotline which had been developing since 2021. The fifth Avengers movie, Avengers: The Kang Dynasty, was renamed Avengers: Doomsday. This was a radical departure from multiversal villainy centered on Kang to dealing with a more “realistic” but just as threatening antagonist.

From The Kang Dynasty to Avengers: Doomsday

Marvel had originally centered the entire Multiverse Saga on Kang after being impressed with Majors’ turn as He Who Remains in Loki. The time-traveling, reality-altering villain’s age made him a perfect choice for a story that would take place across multiple timelines and dimensions. However, it has been reported that Marvel Studios had reservations about Kang and the Multiverse Saga even prior to Majors’ legal troubles, suggesting there were some doubts internally as to the direction.

Robert Downey Jr. Returns as Doctor Doom

In one of the most surprising MCU news of all time, Robert Downey Jr. was confirmed to be returning to the franchise as Victor von Doom/Doctor Doom at San Diego Comic-Con 2024. Downey’s dramatic unmasking of himself onstage during the announcement sent shockwaves through the entertainment industry.

The casting decision is a “daring creative pivot” as the former Iron Man actor now embodies one of Marvel’s most iconic villains. Iron Man 3 director Shane Black predicts this casting will “singlehandedly reignite the entire comic book movie industry”. Black said, “I think he’s going to singlehandedly reinvigorate the entire comic book movie industry with that. At first, it seemed like a cynical move, you know, like “Oh, let’s just go back to the well of the one guy that seems to always save us.” But it’s going to be. It’s going to be great.

The Ripple Effect: Industry and Fan Responses

The entertainment industry has been cautiously optimistic about these seismic shifts. Marvel waited until Majors was convicted to fire him, an act of restraint compared to the industry norm of immediately dismissing actors on the basis of accusations as shared.

A number of MCU alumni have voiced their enthusiasm at Downey’s return, although many were surprised by the news. Jeremy Renner disclosed that he had “no idea” about the casting, and that Downey “said nothing” to his MCU colleagues. Tom Hiddleston described the casting as “remarkable” and “absolutely extraordinary”.

Some fans have complained about the casting, fearful of Doom being given a revised origin that includes Tony Stark.Still, the bar is set extremely high, with a lot of people seeing this as Marvel’s shot at recapturing the magic of the Infinity Saga.

Read More:- James Bond’s Next Era: Amazon Takes the Reins of 007 – Who Will Be the New Bond?

Phase 6 Takes a Drastic New Turn

Doctor Doom will be the main villain of Avengers: Doomsday (2026) and Avengers: Secret Wars (2027). The Russo Brothers, who helmed Infinity War and Endgame, are back to direct both movies. This is a massive deviation from the original Kang-centric narrative, however there are rumors that Marvel might still find a way to finish off the story for Kang via a potential recast.

The changes are not just about swapping out the villain. Marvel is slashing its content output drastically`, with as few as two films a year, rather than up to four in recent years shared by Screenrant. The change is part of a larger Disney strategy to prioritize quality over quantity after some mixed feelings about recent MCU offerings.

A Defining Moment for Marvel’s Future

The Phase 6 overhaul is arguably the most significant plot twist the MCU has ever seen. What was meant to be a multiverse story focused on Kang has now become something else entirely, with Doctor Doom seemingly going to end the Multiverse Saga. Early reviews from the cast are that Downey’s performance as Doom is outstanding, with Vanessa Kirby calling it “some of the most amazing work I’ve seen” in. The success of this recalibration will ultimately dictate the MCU’s future path. With Marvel now proceeding with Avengers: Doomsday in December 2026, the entertainment world wonders if the breathtaking turn of events behind the scenes is going to lead to a resurgence of creativity or become a cautionary tale about the perils of planning franchise far ahead in a volatile world.

Final Thoughts

The Marvel Phase 6 storyline changes entirely and gives everyone a big shock with its new plot. The decision of changing the biggest villain of the Multiverse Saga is tough for Russo Brother but they came back with a surprise casting after Jonathan Majors got fired, Robert Downey Jr. is returned as a villain in Avengers next film Avengers: Doomsday. Marvel entirely dropped the Kang-centric plotline that was supposed to be the overarching menace throughout Phases 4, 5 and 6 and adopt renamed it with Doomsday. 

Alpana

Articles Published : 118

Alpana is Fandomfans Senior Editor across all genres of entertainment. She evolved in the media industry since a very long time, she manages the content strategy and editing of all the blogs. Her focus on story development, review analysis, and research is well-equipped that ensures every article meets the standards of accuracy and depth.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.