James Gunn Rebuilding DC Universe by Learning From Marvel’s Biggest Mistakes

James Gunn is rebuilding the DC Universe with a new storytelling strategy inspired by Marvel’s mistakes. Here’s how the new DCU will reshape superhero films.

Published: Mar 17, 2026, 12:28 PM
Last Updated: May 11, 2026, 7:31 AM

For the past 10 years we have been living in a two giant world. Marvel had constructed a cultural skyscraper only to allow it to become a little wobbly with “multiverse homework” and streaming bloat. Meanwhile, the DC Universe was like a stunning, shadowy cathedral that somebody got distracted from completing, leaving fans polarized and breathless.

The tides are turning. Now, with James Gunn and Peter Safran in charge at the newly created DC Studios, it’s not just a “refresh.” We’re seeing a wholesale architectural teardown rebuild. Here’s how the upcoming DCU is trying to learn from the past, and look very different doing so. 

When Warner Bros. Discovery finished its large-scale reorganization, they not only brought in new executives — they gave control to a filmmaker who had actually made successful DC movies. 

Peacemaker series and Gunn’s The Suicide Squad (2021) were a handful of bright spots in the DCEU’s waning years. Now, as co-chairs of the newly created DC Studios, they are doing something no one has ever done: a total reboot that takes a leaf out of every mistake its competitors and precipitants made. 

Resetting the Multiverse Without Erasing the Past

Here’s the thing about rebooting a multibillion dollar franchise: you can’t just act like the last decade never happened. Hard reboots drive away your most loyal fans. Soft reboots carry all the baggage with them. You’re in a lose-lose situation — unless you have some smarts.

the Multiverse Without Erasing the Past

DC Universe had its answer in The Flash (2023), and it’s weirder and more beautiful than anything Marvel has tried.

In the vast majority of multiverse tales—including Marvel’s—time travel causes branching timelines. Alter the past, and you are bifurcating reality into parallel lines that coexist. It’s neat, it makes sense, and it’s mathematically satisfying. DC Universe threw that playbook out the window. 

DC’s Clever Solution to Continuity

Instead, they brought in what they refer to as the “spaghetti” multiverse theory. When Barry Allen took the Chronobowl to save his mother, he didn’t just branch reality—he tangled it. In the DC multiverse, time isn’t just moving in a straight line. Alter one event and that change cascades forward and backwards in time, ripping apart what we usually think of as temporal linearity. When you drop a fork into a pot of boiling spaghetti and stir it vigorously – everything coils, knots, and blends. The end result, by the end, is something that is nothing like the simple elements you began with.  

This granted Gunn and Safran a vast creative loophole. They didn’t have to pitch their new DC Universe as some other dimension, separate from anything fans had ever seen. Rather, the old DCEU continuity was effectively broken down and rebuilt, with certain aspects able to survive and the rest washed away. 

Viola Davis as Amanda Waller and you don’t have to hear me complain about that? Done. John Cena’s Peacemaker? There’s no way for me he should lose. Xolo Maridueña’s Blue Beetle? Sure, that worked. But Zack Snyder’s Justice League? The blowing up of Metropolis in Man of Steel? All that convoluted lore that weighed the franchise down.

From a business angle, Gunn just kept what he personally controlled and dumped the rest. It’s the most elegant corporate restructuring ever disguised as science fiction. 

Learning From Marvel’s Biggest Mistake

If you wanted to understand everything that The Marvels (2023) has its fingers in, then you”ll be needing about 20 hours of streaming content first. WandaVision, Ms. Marvel, Secret Invasion, the movie presumes that you’ve done your homework. This “interconnectivity at all costs” mentality began turning casual entertainment into a chore, and audiences reacted by sheltering in place.

Learning From Marvel’s Biggest Mistake

James Gunn saw this disintegration before his eyes and he made an intent that sounds simple but is revolutionary: Every DCU movie must work as a standalone film.

The New DCU Storytelling Strategy

Consider the new universe’s first series, the upcoming Creature Commandos animated show that begins in December 2024. Characters such as Rick Flag Sr. and Circe, are introduced with the fictional country of Pokolistan. Then in 2025, Flag Sr. was the primary antagonist shown in a Peacemaker Season 2. He refers to breaking his back (which occurred in Creature Commandos) and to missions in Pokolistan. 

Certain fans can look at these connections, and the whole universe feels lived-in and pays off for those that pay attention. For more casual viewers? They are just idiosyncrasies that add “texture.” You don’t have to watch the cartoon show to know that Flag is a military man with a grudge. The central plot, Flag hunting down those responsible for his son’s death—stands on its own.

The New DCU Storytelling Strategy

Release dates for movies are the same. There’s no requirement for readers to have consumed any other material when Superman flies into theaters in July 2025. Gunn’s Superman has already been on the scene for three years. There’s no Krypton exploding, no Kansas farm boy routine, no “how I got my wings” montage. We are handed a world where there are superheroes, where the Justice Gang (Mr. Terrific, Hawkgirl, Metamorpho) is already up and running and where we both the viewers and those who lurk within the show’s mythology have to hang or catch on. 

Even Marvel’s Kevin Feige himself — the man who is essentially the superhero of Marvel’s master plan attended a London screening and sang the praises of that mentality. You’ll figure out who is Mr. Terrific. When the president of your rival company is complimenting your tactics, you know you’ve got something good going.

Slow and steady world-building, when every superpower needs a solid pseudoscience explanation? passed style of era. The audiences are now smart enough to go into fantasy straight away if the characters are strong and they know what the emotional stakes are. 

The Script-First Rule

Here is an industry secret that explains why so many recent blockbusters look so bad: The “fix it in post” mentality of Marvel. Rather than completed scripts, during its breakneck growth Marvel approved projects on the basis of loose pitches and release dates. 

How DC Studios Plans to Avoid Marvel’s VFX Chaos

Directors staged enormous action sequences on barren green screens with none of the costume designs locked in, with no practical lighting and without the choreography final. Basic creative choices were punted to post, where drained VFX artists attempted to patch together intelligible movies from dailies of shot footage.

The number of dead was staggering. Marvel VFX workers described brutal overwork, ever-shifting directives from studio heads demanding massive third act rewrites just weeks before premiere, and filmmakers new to heavily CGI-driven pipelines. This was exploited to the breaking point in the mid-2020s, culminating in historic unionization under IATSE. By May 2025, these workers successfully negotiated and ratified their first collective bargaining agreements which provides for overtime pay, pensions, healthcare, and mandatory rest intervals. 

The Script-First Rule

James Gunn gazed upon this bled-out pipeline and implemented a policy that was radical for the time: no project would go into production without a finished, studio-locked script. This ‘script-first’ mentality might appear to be common sense, but it has become revolutionary in today’s Hollywood. With the narrative locked before filming, directors are now able to storyboard all their action sequences, finalize costume designs and have an exact idea of how much CGI they’ll need. VFX suppliers get concrete blueprints rather than moving targets. The endless revisions and last-minute rendering sprints are gone.

Smaller Budgets, Bigger Freedom

The payoff is already clear. MCU films in late stages were inflating to $250-300+ million with reshoots and VFX reworks, but this is extreme fiscal responsibility from DC Studios. Supergirl carries a $150-170 million budget which will hit in 2026) and Clayface thrives on $40 million. 

Smaller budgets mean smaller break-evens. Supergirl can gross 40% less than Superman and still turn a profit. Not every movie has to go after a billion dollars. This relieves the pressure that made Marvel productions into joyless corporate chores, and lets filmmakers take real creative risks. 

From Snyder’s Dark Cathedral to Gunn’s Creative Sandbox

In order to understand what the DCU is turning into you need to know what it’s turning away from. Zack Snyder bared his soul to the whole DC pantheon with a brutal art-house aesthetic. He thought of superheroes not as people you could identify with, but as contemporary mythological gods. 

His movies — Man of Steel, Batman v Superman, Zack Snyder’s Justice League — were grand, operatic tragedies rooted in Christian allegory, extreme slow-motion camerawork and heavily drained color palettes.

Critics labeled it a “cathedral”: breathtakingly beautiful, solemn, hard-edged and unified. But cathedrals aren’t made for evolution. Once the DC Universe found its footing with this dark, end-of-the-world tone, everything had to adapt. There was no place for comedy, whimsy, or — you know — bright sci-fi optimism. A universe designed for a dark, god-like Batman certainly can’t handle Booster Gold without breaking its own reality. 

Why DC Is Changing Its Most Iconic Hero

Snyder’s Superman, in particular, was quite polarizing. In three film appearances, Henry Cavill’s incarnation uttered just 159 lines. He was apprehended as a terrifying geopolitical reality—an alien messiah whose being precipitated worldwide paranoia. He became the symbol of divine responsibility by floating above humanity.

The theme changed to counterprogramming in Gunn’s Superman (2025). The David Corenswet version radiates warmth, happiness, and openness. He gets beat. He bleeds. He becomes emotionally distraught when he is unable to rescue civilians in a war between the fictional nations of Boravia and Jarhanpur. He has great chemistry with Lois Lane – who is now an equal partner and not a damsel in distress — and he also stars alongside Krypto, a hilariously disobedient super-dog who ignores commands. 

The costume, after all, tells the tale: frequently singed, crumpled, a bit too tight. This isn’t some perfect, infallible god. This guy is a Midwestern nice guy, just an earnest, hardworking guy trying his best.

Gunn describes his take as a “sandbox not a cathedral.” The DCU is a multigenre system in which tone is defined by character needs rather than studio requirements. In 2026 alone, we’ve got Supergirl (cosmic space op!), Lanterns (gritty earthly mystery à la True Detective), and Clayface (small-scale body horror). This is mimicking what you do in an actual comic book experience anyway, where you flip pages and find yourself going from vibrant sci-fi to moody horror. 

Multiple Batman Without Confusing Fans

Here’s a paradox that gave Marvel a headache: How do you keep continuity interconnected while letting auteur filmmakers pursue distinct visions? Marvel’s response was traditionally to strangle signatories of its “house style” with directorial voices. The result was a look and tone that blurred together, making movies interchangeable.

This DC Studios issue was solved with the institutionalization of the “Elseworlds” label — taken from the labyrinth of DC Comics publishing — as a core business strategy. Projects under this banner are completely out of continuity and will give top-tier talent the chance to create adult oriented masterpieces, not worried about the implications of crossovers. 

Multiple Batman Without Confusing Fans

The more ambitious Matt Reeves, now working with a Robert Pattinson trilogy and a spin-off series about The Penguin, The Batman Epic Crime Saga (Robert Pattinson’s Films & The Penguin Series) continues. Todd Phillips’ Joker universe is standalone. 

The Harley Quinn cartoon series is still running on Max. When Warner Bros. Discovery CEO David Zaslav famously stated in 2022 that “there is not going to be four Batmans,” he was technically correct—there would be multiple Batmans, they would just be clearly demarcated and marketed so consumers could tell them apart. 

This just goes to show that the very idea of multiple iterations is a feature, not a bug. While viewers can bask in Reeves’ hyper-realistic noir, they can also look ahead to the more fantastical “bat-family” team-up to be seen in DC Universe’s The Brave and the Bold. Narrative monopoly is not required for franchise expansion. 

The Future of DC Studios

Projecting 2026 to break box office record of this decade, the industry analyst expects it to make $35 billion worldwide. The big increase is being driven by the massive franchise IP owned by each of the two major players.

Spider-Man: Brand New Day and Avengers: Doomsday. But as had been the case in the 2010s, when Marvel essentially ran the roost, DC Studios is now potentially in a position to take substantial market share. Supergirl (June 26, 2026)· Lanterns (HBO)· Clayface (September)·.

If DC Universe can continue to meet the high bar of Creature Commandos and Superman, then that drought will be broken and the greater tide of the economy will benefit these series. 

Read More:- Netflix’s One Piece Season 2 Introduced Early Cameo From Original Manga by Eiichiro Oda 

Conclusion

James Gunn and Peter Safran’s DC Universe is a step-up in franchise stewardship. An examination of the operational, narrative, and labor failures of the late-stage Marvel and pre-New 52 DCEU has led to a more robust, creatively flexible, and fiscally responsible model.

The “script-first” mandate shields against VFX disasters and budget fattening. 

The “sandbox” method pays homage to comic book versatility by way of real tonal diversity. The splitting off of narrative universes removes the “homework” burden while still rewarding dedicated fans. The ‘Elseworlds’ principle protects the auteur vision without further fracturing the corporate logic.

But most important is that the victory of an openly resisted Superman proves they never turned their backs on superheroes; what they did turn their backs on was cynical, ill-conceived, too-burdensome storytelling. 

As 2026 looms, the DC Universe isn’t just vying with Marvel. It is setting a new standard for how huge intellectual properties can be created, produced and marketed to an increasingly global audience. 

Dive into the world of entertainment with Fandomfans to get more latest updates from movies, series, and celebrities.

Comments

2 thoughts on “James Gunn Rebuilding DC Universe by Learning From Marvel’s Biggest Mistakes”

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Alpana

Articles Published: 173

Alpana is Fandomfans Senior Editor across all genres of entertainment. She evolved in the media industry since a very long time, she manages the content strategy and editing of all the blogs. Her focus on story development, review analysis, and research is well-equipped that ensures every article meets the standards of accuracy and depth.

View Profile ↗

Five Nights at Freddy 2 Is All About What Survival Takes From You

Five Nights at Freddy 2 explores the dark cost of survival, inherited trauma, and the tragic split between Mike and Vanessa in Emma Tammi’s brutal sequel.

Published: Jan 2, 2026, 12:55 PM
Last Updated: Jan 2, 2026, 1:00 PM

The first Five Nights at Freddy’s movie was all about survival, the sequel is a brutal education on what that survival costs. Five Nights at Freddy 2, directed by Emma Tammi, leaps beyond jump scares to unpack a far more terrifying idea: inherited trauma. At the center of this story is the deteriorating relationship between Mike Schmidt and Vanessa Afton — which evolves from a mutual “trauma bond” into an unfortunate, tragic separation.

In a bold gesture, the film takes a wrecking ball to the relationship formed in the first episode, demonstrating that occasionally, shared suffering doesn’t make for a future. 

Mike Schmidt’s Quiet Transformation

Mike Schmidt’s Quiet Transformation
Image Credit: Fandomfans

To understand the tragic ending, we have to take a look at how Mike Schmidt (Josh Hutcherson) has evolved. In the first film, Mike was frozen in time, overcome with guilt for his brother Garrett’s vanishing. Two now, the Mike we know is not the same. He has traded his obsession with the past for a fierce presence in the “now”.

Abby Changes Everything

Abby Changes Everything
Image Credit: Fandomfans

Now, he is all about Abby. This growth is necessary because it provides the reason for his final choice. Mike doesn’t want answers anymore; he wants protection. When the supernatural danger moves up from the backroom of the industrial pizzeria into Mike’s own home, Mike’s protective instincts trump his compassion. He isn’t just a brother anymore; He’s a protector who realizes he can’t save them all. 

The Fragility of a Trauma Bond

A trauma bond when the relationship between Mike and Vanessa is explicitly described by director Emma Tammi as such. 

The toughest reality those characters had to deal with was learning to trust one another again. They were the only two people who had been through what they had, and that made a bond between them like nothing else.

— Emma Tammi said

It suggests that they are also the only two people who have been through the terror of the animatronics. They feel themselves, naturally, drawn to each other. But the sequel reveals fissures in this base.

Mike vs Vanessa — Their Emotions Divide

Mike vs Vanessa — Their Emotions Divide
Image Credit: Fandomfans

Mike recognizes that Vanessa is a victim of her father, William Afton, but he also blames her for the secrets she’s keeping. The movie asks the hard question: Is it possible to trust when what you share is fear? 

CharacterPrimary Driver (Movie 1)Primary Driver (Movie 2)
Mike SchmidtGuilt and ObsessionResponsibility and Safety
Vanessa AftonFear and ComplianceRedemption and Truth
Abby SchmidtLonelinessConnection and Agency

Fazfest Massacre Confirms Mike’s Worst Fear

The point of no return is reached with the arrival of Michael Afton (Vanessa’s brother, who has been missing for a very long time). When Michael surfaces as the heir to William’s violence, orchestrating the massacre at Fazfest, it affirms Mike Schmidt’s deepest fear: the Afton family is a “magnet for problems.”

Fazfest Massacre Confirms Mike’s Worst Fear
Image Credit: Fandomfans

In the aftermath Mike makes a controversial decision that has divided the fanbase. He tells Vanessa to “stay away.” It seems a bit cold, especially after she saved him twice, but she has to following narrative logic. “Afton rot,” as Mike calls it, is contagious. He knows that while Vanessa—as well as whatever baggage her family has—is still out there, Abby will never be safe. As Tammi put it, that was a “bridge too far.” Mike achieved his breaking point. 

The Marionette and the Ultimate Loss of Agency

The tragedy of the film’s finale is not that they separate, it’s that Vanessa is taken from her so soon. Disowned by her (surrogate) parents (Mike and Abby) and afraid of her biological heritage, she is defenseless.

“I never thought the Marionette was scary—until I saw it in person. It was huge, unsettling, and its wiggly limbs made it genuinely terrifying.”

— Piper Rubio said

As Collider shared, Vanessa, in a cruel reversal of fortune, is possessed by the Marionette, the essence of Charlotte Emily, William Afton’s inaugural victim. Vanessa had been trying to regain some of her power, to get as far away from her father’s shadow as possible for the whole movie. Instead, she is made the vessel for the violence he initiated in 1982. The final shot of her turning into the Marionette is the ultimate failure of being unable to escape legacy. 

Conclusion

Five Nights at Freddy 2 concludes on a sad note. The original specter children might have been laid to rest, but the living are left holding the pieces. Mike makes it to survival over sentimentality by cutting ties with Vanessa. It’s a brutal human moment in a movie about haunted robots.

Now the sequel informs us that trauma is cyclical. Mike breaks the cycle by leaving, but Vanessa is consumed by it. As the credits end, we’re struck by the disquieting fact that the doors to Freddy Fazbear’s Pizza never actually close — they just wait for a lull in activity to open once more. 

Fandomfans delivers the latest updates from movies, series and TV shows directly to you. For more updates, stay connected.

Comments

View comments and join the discussion

Mariyam

Articles Published: 87

Mariyam Khan is Fandomfans Content Writer and providing reports and reviews on Movie Celebrities, and Superheroes particularly Marvel & DC. She is covering across multiple genres from more than 4+ years, experience in delivering the timely updates.

View Profile ↗

What Brings Colin Farrell Back to Matt Reeves’ Batman Universe

Colin Farrell returns to Matt Reeves' Batman universe as the Penguin in The Batman Part II, and shares the dark world of Gotham and his passion storytelling.

Published: Oct 29, 2025, 6:07 AM
Last Updated: May 11, 2026, 8:10 AM

Colin Farrell has got us very excited to return to Gotham as The Penguin in The Batman Part II. Far from it being about getting action scenes right, or even stealing the show with the character’s arc. Farrel explained in a chat with Collider that what pulls him back are the people he gets to work with, and the “Matt Reeves immersive world that’s just very, very gritty.” There’s definitely a love for the vibe and the behind the scenes team it feels like. Farrell kept it real, he explained the camaraderie and new ways of working on set keep bringing him back, as he promotes the upcoming movie The Ballad of a Small Player releasing on 29 October 2025.

Colin Farrell delivered so many thoughts on his role in HBO’s massive hit The Penguin. So the experience evidently stuck with him for good. The series its eight-episodes run in late 2024. It garnered rave reviews, high ratings, and mentions for major awards like the Emmys and Golden Globes. Farrell really got to dive deep into the character, all of the intricate layers and psychological twists and turns that you can only explore in a long form series. Apparently the part allowed him to stretch his acting chops quite a bit, and fans seemed to get as much pleasure as he did. With all the buzz around the show, it is no surprise that The Penguin turned out to be one of HBO’s breakout hits. 

The show ended up a huge success, attracting 5.3 million viewers across all platforms during its first weekend, marking the largest four-day debut for a tier one Max original since The Last of Us dusted off in January 2023. The show received rave reviews from critics with a 94% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, with many reviews referring to Colin Farrell’s performance as “transformative” and “a true tour de force.” 

The Question is what brings Farrell back for The Batman Part II

It’s not so much ‘What do I do with this?, but I just want to be in that world and be with Robert and be with Jeffrey again and be brought by Matt Reeves,’ said Farrell. After a deeper exploration of the HBO series character, Farrell returning to the movie sequel isn’t about further expanding the Penguin’s story, instead rejoining the talented ensemble. 

The Batman Part II

Colin Farrell shared his happiness by saying “I’m really excited to be back in that world, to just be around it,” he said as he contemplated joining such an unparalleled group of creatives once more.  

Reliving The Childhood Dream 

Farrell’s ties to the world of Batman are deeply embedded since he was a kid growing up in Dublin. He shared, he was raised watching Burgess Meredith’s legendary turn as the Penguin in the ‘60s Batman TV series when he was 5, and then Danny DeVito’s iconic performance in Tim Burton’s Batman Returns at around 11 or 12. 

Reliving The Childhood Dream

For the actor, the joy is a little simpler, just getting to play in a world “where a character called Bruce Wayne and Batman exist, is such a joy.” He admired how Reeves had “re-imagined a world that is unique enough and yet still honors the struggles of that city and the psychological struggles of the character of Bruce Wayne.” 

Read More  👉  Gen V Season 2: A Triumphant College Reunion That Sets the Stage for Epic Battles

Farrell Is Confirmed For The Batman Part II

Although Farrell has now confirmed that his part in The Batman Part II will be very small, a smaller appearance than in the first film. He has read the full script and described it as “extraordinary”. He hinted that THE BATMAN 2 is a much deeper plot, it means that Reeves is expected to be seen in scarier scenes and it will further keep the franchise as the stakes are bigger.

Farrell Is Confirmed For The Batman Part II  

Filming for The Batman Part II is set to begin April 2026. Robert Pattinson, Jeffrey Wright, Andy Serkis and Colin Farrell are returning to their roles. Farrell seems doubtful about a second season of The Penguin. He said to Deadline, “I’ve heard some talk about it, but I don’t know if that’s a good idea. Part of me thinks we should just leave it as we got away with something special.” 

Conclusion

For Farrell, being part of Matt Reeves’ Batman world is more than just another gig—it’s a dream come true from his childhood, and he’s surrounded by collaborators who are as passionate as he is about telling grounded, character-driven stories in the dark, complex reality of Gotham. The criminal underworld of Gotham City is once again ready to entertain their fans but Colin Farrell’s Penguin has made a permanent impact on the Batman mythos and his passion for this universe and the team behind it will keep him coming back for as long as they’ll have him.

Comments

View comments and join the discussion

Alpana

Articles Published: 173

Alpana is Fandomfans Senior Editor across all genres of entertainment. She evolved in the media industry since a very long time, she manages the content strategy and editing of all the blogs. Her focus on story development, review analysis, and research is well-equipped that ensures every article meets the standards of accuracy and depth.

View Profile ↗

Paul Dano Joins Florian Zeller’s Psychological Thriller ‘Bunker’: An Exciting Development for 2026

Paul Dano joins Javier Bardem and Penelope Cruz in Florian Zeller's new psychological thriller Bunker, which will be a major cinematic release in 2026.

Published: Dec 9, 2025, 12:17 PM
Last Updated: Dec 9, 2025, 12:23 PM

Paul Dano has been the subject of some, not all of it boring Dolby-drama-based Hollywood chat heat. After Quentin Tarantino’s inflammatory comments about the actor last week, the industry came out in support of Dano, showing that sometimes the loudest voices are not everyone’s. Instead of retreating from the public eye, the lauded actor is going straight into something truly extraordinary: Oscar-winning director Florian Zeller’s next film, the psychological thriller Bunker. 

It’s worth taking a moment to appreciate what this casting actually is. Zeller, whose credentials include the beloved play The Father (which won Hopkins the Oscar for Best Actor and earned Zeller himself one for Best Adapted Screenplay), is renowned for getting the best out of his performers. 

Paul Dano Joins Florian Zeller's
Image Credit: Fandomfans

His second film, The Son, may have divided critics, but it still garnered Hugh Jackman a Golden Globe nomination. Now, with Bunker, Zeller is putting together what can only be described as a powerhouse ensemble. 

A Powerhouse Ensemble Cast

The cast is a veritable who’s-who among Hollywood stars. Dano is teaming with Oscar-winning real life couple Javier Bardem and Penélope Cruz, whose on and off-screen chemistry is already legendary.

A Powerhouse Ensemble Cast
Image Credit: Fandomfans

Stephen Graham, gritty, intense actor famous for his role in the television series “Justified,” and Patrick Schwarzenegger complete the cast. This is not some film being made under the radar — this is a prestige title that plans to make a splash in 2026 cinema. 

What is The Bunker Really About? 

Bunker follows an architect whose life and marriage are complicated when he takes on the design of a survival bunker for a wealthy tech tycoon. When this secretive building project starts to penetrate the family’s life, things begin to disintegrate. The premise alone indicates the psychological heights that Zeller has been known for.

The Bunker Really About
Image Credit: Fandomfans

This is a director who knows that genuine tension is not a byproduct of jump scares or external threats — it’s born when relationships break down under duress, in probing the ethical compromises we make and examining how fear informs our decisions. 

Read More 👉 James Cameron Revealed About Avatar: Fire and Ash Scripting Details

Zeller Wrote This Film Specifically With Bardem

The director was inspired by their real-life nearly seventeen year marriage and he’s created a narrative that addresses the challenges of long term relationships in an increasingly volatile world. That type of writing intentionality leads to more real, strong performances. When Zeller spoke about recruiting Dano to the project, his words were effusive.

“From Little Miss Sunshine to There Will Be Blood, Paul has never ceased to surprise me as an actor,”
–he said. 

That’s not the kind of recommendation that is bandied about. This is a director who has directed some of the most acclaimed performances of recent film, and when he talks about working with Dano, he sounds genuinely excited. 

“He has a remarkable singularity - something truly unique – and in that respect he is irreplaceable.”
—He also said

Production and Industry Backing

The film is now in its second week of production, shooting in Madrid, and London. Blue Morning Pictures and the Spanish company MOD Producciones are producing, with international sales by Film Nation Entertainment. Everything about the set-up indicates a film that’s being treated as a substantial artistic effort and not just another genre piece. 

Production and Industry Backing
Image Credit: Fandomfans

What that timing makes especially intriguing is how it positions Dano’s career going forward. Instead of being defined by recent controversy, he has attached himself immediately to an art house project and a director known for eliciting complex, nuanced performances. Take Tarantino’s assessment with a degree of salt if you want, but Dano is clearly in demand by the filmmakers who really matter. 

Conclusion

As we approach 2026, Bunker is becoming another film to keep an eye on. With Zeller at the helm, a cast that strong, and a premise that insinuates genuine psychological depth, this very well could be the film that ignites discussions and the kind of performances that stick with audiences well beyond the credits. 

Fandomfans provides every detail on the upcoming movies and projects of the industries that keeps you evolving with the entertainment.

Comments

View comments and join the discussion

Mariyam

Articles Published: 87

Mariyam Khan is Fandomfans Content Writer and providing reports and reviews on Movie Celebrities, and Superheroes particularly Marvel & DC. She is covering across multiple genres from more than 4+ years, experience in delivering the timely updates.

View Profile ↗

‘Wake Up Dead Man’ Review: A Bold Mystery but Missing the Knives Out Spark

"Wake Up Dead Man review: Superb performances and a bold storyline, but this Knives Out follow-up lacks the complex twists of the originals." Learn more..!

Published: Nov 27, 2025, 12:45 PM
Last Updated: Jan 24, 2026, 6:38 AM

The late 2025 launch of Wake Up Dead Man: A Knives Out Mystery is a high-stakes moment for one of the greatest IPs in modern moviemaking. Taking its place as the crown jewel amongst writer-director Rian Johnson’s body of work, the Knives Out franchise hasn’t simply breathed new life into the “whodunit” genre, it has transformed it into a tool for sharp social commentary, adapting the warm tropes of Agatha Christie to unpack the unsettling realities of 21st-century American class relations. 

Coming off the sleeper theatrical success of Knives Out (2019) and the opulent, streaming-centered cultural moment of Glass Onion (2022), this third entry arrives with the weight of an inherently high-stakes legacy and the burdensome $450 million payday by Netflix. 

Although the film has received overwhelmingly positive ratings—for example, it currently has a Rotten Tomatoes rating of 96% to 100% in the wake of its premiere at the Toronto International Film Festival—a close read of the reviews reveals a series struggling to find new energy in its satirical bite and its narrative mechanics. 

The biggest departure in Wake Up Dead Man and the cause of most critical dissent is its bold structure. Johnson seeks to destabilize the standard whodunit paradigm not in the question of who did it, but in the mode of storytelling. 

Bold Structural Shift: Blanc Arrives Too Late

Everything has been turned on its head in what is being called a “subversive” and “harmful” marketing move: The franchise centerpiece, Benoit Blanc (Daniel Craig), does not show up until the 45-minute mark. This decision in narrative style changes the whole DNA of the whodunit. 

Bold Structural Shift
Image credit: IMDb

The movie devotes its whole first act to introducing the “victim,” Monsignor Jefferson Wicks (Josh Brolin), and the main protagonist/suspect, Father Jud Duplenticy (Josh O’Connor). The viewer is so deeply ensconced in the personalities of the Chimney Rock group, the history of the church and even the philosophical divide between Jud and Wicks that the arrival of law enforcement feels intrusive. The point of this construction is to give the mystery an emotional charge — the murder is not simply a brainteaser, but a tragedy involving characters the audience has come to know. 

Reviewers said the first two reels of the film are slow. By the time the detective, Blanc, finally makes his appearance, most of the puzzles are already set on the table, so he’s not quite as active and important as he was in previous entries. He’s more like a “buddy cop” partner to Father Jud than the main engine of the narrative.

Blanc arriving
Image credit: IMDb

With Blanc arriving so late, the first act becomes a drama — nicely acted, but lacking the strong mystery “hook” that normally pulls audience in. That’s why they thought it was “far too long” to get truly started. 

Classic Locked-Room Mystery With Predictable Twists

The movie borrows from a classic play, “the locked room” mystery, in which a murder takes place inside a church during a service and only the congregants could be suspects. The premise is entertaining — a seemingly impossible murder with no weapon or assailant in sight, inspired by old-school authors like John Dickson Carr. 

Reviewers enjoyed the classic Christie-style tone, but many thought the answer was both a little too complex and still too easy to guess. Since the killer could be identified by the audience rather early on, the mystery was not very surprising and some considered the film to have lost the unpredictable energy that made the previous Knives Out films so exciting. 

The film’s primary antagonist Monsignor Wicks is a gaunt, terrorized priest who wields religion as a tool of oppression, placing him among the more blatant political extremism and faith abuse in the stacked deck of the film. The movie even sets him up against the gentler Father Jud to illustrate the difference between poisonous institutions and real spirituality. But many reviewers found the satire too on the nose and “safe.” 

The portrayal of Wicks is made so blatantly villainous that the satire feels toothless and uninspired, especially when compared to the cutting, dangerous satire of the earlier Knives Out films. It makes the criticism feel routine and less hard-hitting. 

Read More  👉  An Exhaustive Strategic and Narrative Analysis of Eva Green’s Casting in Wednesday Season 3 

Bigger Scale, But Less Sharp Writing

Reviews say the movie is bigger than Knives Out but not as sharp as Glass Onion, and many feel it doesn’t have the tight, focused writing of the first film. It also plays it safe, leaning on well-worn mystery tropes rather than attempting to surprise or outsmart its audience. 

Bigger Scale, But Less Sharp Writing

Although the storyline can appear to be baffling at the beginning, the twists are quite predictable, which causes the mystery to be foreseeable and less emotional. Without a clever, mind blowing reveal, the ending just feels mundane. 

Conclusion

Wake Up Dead Man is a “safe” triumph—a film that refines the form but loses the anarchic, punk-rock energy that made Knives Out a sensation. It’s a mystery that insists on being watched for its craft, if not one that will be viewed again and again as its antecedents have been. 

Moving forward with the franchise, Johnson has a choice— he can continue his journey toward introspection and “cinema,” or he can come back to the tight, aggressive storytelling that made the original a searing experience. The “Knives” may still be out, but this time, they seem a little less sharp. 

Fandomfans is an entertainment source which delivers consistently every movie reviews analysis and audience reception for a Wake Up Dead Man movie.

Comments

View comments and join the discussion

Mariyam

Articles Published: 87

Mariyam Khan is Fandomfans Content Writer and providing reports and reviews on Movie Celebrities, and Superheroes particularly Marvel & DC. She is covering across multiple genres from more than 4+ years, experience in delivering the timely updates.

View Profile ↗

Avatar: Fire and Ash Review: Becoming the Lowest Rating Film of The Franchise

Avatar: Fire and Ash review explores James Cameron’s bold visuals, divisive story, critical backlash, and why it’s the lowest-rated film in the franchise.

The release of Avatar: Fire and Ash is an intriguing if somewhat chaotic, chapter in the career of James Cameron. Opening in theaters onDecember 19, 2025, the film is in an odd place: it’s both the most visually audacious entry in the series and the most critically divisive.

Although the technological crowd-pleasing remains unmatched, the “Pandora fatigue” some warned about seems to be setting in. The franchise is, for the first time, confronting the prospect of diminishing returns – not necessarily at the box office, but with the critics, who are starting to wonder, “Is spectacle enough?” 

A High-Stakes Strategy

James Cameron isn’t merely making a movie, he’s defending an empire. With a mind-boggling $400 million budget, the film has to do more than just “well” — it has to dominate.

Premium Format Dominance: The film is designed for IMAX 3D and Dolby Cinema. In a streaming world, Cameron is betting everything on the ‘theatrical event,’ recouping sky-high production costs with now-higher ticket prices.

A High-Stakes Strategy

The Marvel Synergy: The cynical-looking (but actually rather smart) marketing move that Disney is rotating four different trailers for Avengers: Doomsday exclusively with Fire and Ash screenings. It’s a transparent play to encourage repeat viewings by exploiting the MCU’s “completionist” fanbase. 

The Visuals: From Lush Jungles to Brutalist Ash

If the first Avatar was a dream and the second was a dive, Fire and Ash is a scorched-earth reality check. With the introduction of the Mangkwan (Ash People) the look shifts from bioluminescent wonder to something much more “brutalist.”

The Visuals From Lush Jungles to Brutalist Ash
Image Credit: Fandomfans

The Ash Biome: The conjugated neons are gone. Rather, smoke-soaked oranges and greys are layered over rugged volcanic stone.

The Design: The Ash People are a spiritual defeat. Their buildings and “soot-stained” clothing imply a society that has distanced itself from the peaceful ways of Eywa and embraced the industrial and hostile. 

The Critical Schism: Immersion vs. Innovation

The reception to Fire and Ash has been polarizing. It is now Cameron’s lowest rated film on aggregators, trending at a 61 on Metacritic.

The Spectacle Faction: Reviewers from such publications as Empire are enamored with the movie, calling it a “sensory feast” and the most “nakedly emotional” film yet. They consider it a film of both grief and world-making.

The Critical Schism Immersion vs. Innovation
Image Credit: Fandomfans

The Redundancy Faction: But also savage critics like The Guardian are a different story. The main gripe? It’s too much of a rip off of The Way of Water. The “run off to a new tribe, pick up their customs, fight a final fight” pattern is beginning to look like a plot template, rather than a story. 

Narrative Risks and Character Hurdles

The storytelling framework of the film’s seems to try and reject then repeat the “noble savage” cone tropes, by having a Na’vi antagonist: Varang (Oona Chaplin), who leads his own group of hunters who persecute the people of Pandora. Her performance is universally praised as the film’s best — a “witchy,” feral ruler who negotiates a dark pact with Quaritch.

But the movie still has to grapple with “the Spider problem.” The persona of Miles Spider Socorro is still a source of contention. Many consider his arc to be underwritten and the romantic tension that develops between him and Kiri (Sigourney Weaver) has been noted as “creepy” as the latter is quite a few years older and is an alien in the show.  

Read More 👉 James Bond Movies: Legendary Fight Scenes of All Time

Conclusion

Avatar: The Fire and Ash is a huge paradox. It’s a movie about environmental conservation that uses up more computer power than the equivalent of thousands of cars. It’s a story that seems to be stuck in the past, told through technology from the future.

Whether this franchise “middle child” can carry the weight for Avatar 4 and 5 is yet to be seen. But this much is clear: If a James Cameron movie turns out to be “formulaic,” it’s still far more ambitious than 90 percent of what gets made. 

Fandomfans provide you with the latest updates on your favorite franchise and overall reviews conclusion.

Comments

View comments and join the discussion

Mariyam

Articles Published: 87

Mariyam Khan is Fandomfans Content Writer and providing reports and reviews on Movie Celebrities, and Superheroes particularly Marvel & DC. She is covering across multiple genres from more than 4+ years, experience in delivering the timely updates.

View Profile ↗

Avengers: Doomsday Costumes First Look Revealed 

Avengers: Doomsday trailer reveals stunning new hero costumes, from Namor’s classic suit to King M’Baku and a comic-accurate Cyclops.

Published: Jan 12, 2026, 6:57 AM
Last Updated: Jan 12, 2026, 6:58 AM

Marvel Studios just unleashed full chaos on the internet with the first official trailer for Avengers: Doomsday. While Robert Downey Jr. (now as the threatening Doctor Doom) has been quite the recent buzz with his return, this trailer also gave us something pretty much just as exciting: a full look at the new costumes our heroes will be wearing as they take on the multiverse’s biggest menace.

From comic-accurate throwbacks to subtle “King-sized” upgrades, here’s the breakdown of the five hero suits we’ve seen so far for the next Avengers epic. 

1. Namor: The Sub-Mariner Goes Classic

In Black Panther: Wakanda Forever, Decán’s visual was heavily inspired by Mayan and Aztec design — and it was breathtaking. But now that it’s Doomsday, DC is going back to his comic book origins.

Namor The Sub-Mariner Goes Classic

According to Screenrant, Namor was seen wearing his signature blue suit, which includes a high, distinctive collar that fans of the ’90s comics will instantly recognize. So it’s a striking turn, and one that indicates he’s really leaning into being a global (and maybe inter-dimensional) operator. 

2. M’Baku: A King’s Ransom

Since then M’Baku has ascended as king of Wakanda too, and his new gear screams a big old “Big King Energy.” No more just traditional Gorilla Tribe armor. In the new trailer, M’Baku wears:

M’Baku A King’s Ransom
  • A long, majestic brown cape.
  • Detailed green metal strips that run through his armor.
  • A silhouette which proudly proclaims “head of the strongest nation on Earth.” 

3. Shuri: The Black Panther Refined

“Shuri isn’t trying to fix what isn’t broken.” Her Black Panther suit remains largely the same as the one she debuted in Wakanda Forever, but some eagle-eyed fans spotted a handful of “tech-y” upgrades.

Shuri The Black Panther Refined

The suit has been updated with a few greenish hints and slightly different weaving patterns. Considering Shuri’s intelligence, these aren’t just stylistic choices — they’re probably new defensive abilities that will aid her against Doctor Doom. 

4. The Thing: Keeping it Fantastic

Ebon Moss-Bachrach’s Ben Grimm (The Thing) got a short but significant cameo. Now fresh from the events of The Fantastic Four: First Steps, he’s donning the very same retro-futuristic team kit we first got a look at in his solo debut.

The Thing Keeping it Fantastic

Visual continuity is looking good as the Fantastic Four at long last are introduced into the main MCU timeline. 

5. Namora: Talokan’s Finest

Rounding out the group of five is Namora. Her costume is largely unchanged from the first time we see her, but her appearance with the Wakandans emphasizes one crucial plot point: that the surface/sea alliance is still very much in existence.

Namora Talokan’s Finest

They need that solidarity if they’re even going to have a chance against Doom. 

What About the X-Men?

While the trailer had a lot of the Wakandans and extends to even more with the Fantastic Four, let’s not dismiss the brief, soul-shaking sighting of James Marsden’s Cyclops. He’s dressed in a bright yellow and blue costume that looks like it was pulled right out of a ’90s comic book cover. It looks like Avengers: Doomsday is finally serving up the “Uncanny” looks we’ve been waiting decades for. 

Read More:- Michelle Randolph’s Big Break: From Landman Fan Favorite to Amazon MGM’s Holiday Rom-Com Lead

Conclusion 

Marvel is being very smart here. They’re merging the grounded, cultural designs of the MCU with the vibrant, brash look of classic Marvel Comics. Whether it’s Namor’s iconic collar or M’Baku’s regal cape, the message is loud and clear: the heroes are leveling up, because they have to. 

Which new suit do you like the best? Personally, having a comic-accurate Cyclops and a “King” M’Baku share the screen has us already anticipating 2026. 

Stay connected with the Fandomfans to find updates from the Marvel movies and characters.

Comments

View comments and join the discussion

Babita

Articles Published: 25

Babita is Fandomfans Editor, experience in managing content. Her focus in general movies and web series. She is having a deep interest in TV shows and 90s movies - particularly Lord of the Rings, Harry Potter, & Rom-Com. Babita also covers psychological thrillers and major releases in current time and concern with deep interest in them.

View Profile ↗

From Kang to Doomsday: Unpacking the MCU’s Phase 6 Revolution

Marvel shocks fans by firing Jonathan Majors and replacing Kang with Robert Downey Jr.’s Doctor Doom in Avengers: Doomsday. MCU Phase 6 reimagined!

Published: Oct 1, 2025, 8:05 AM
Last Updated: Oct 1, 2025, 9:20 AM

The MCU underwent one of its biggest back-end shakeups in recent memory, with massive ramifications for not only the direction of Phase 6 but the entire Multiverse Saga. What started as a grand design revolving around Kang the Conqueror has shifted into an entirely different story, with Doctor Doom emerging as the main Villain.

Jonathan Majors and the Fall of Kang

The change began with dire legal problems for Jonathan Majors, who was set to be the MCU’s next big villain after Thanos. In March 2023, Majors was taken into custody on charges of assault and harassment against his ex-girlfriend Grace Jabbari. The matter intensified when in December 2023 he was convicted by a New York jury of reckless assault and second-degree harassment, The Guardians stated.

Marvel Studios’ Toughest Decision Yet

Marvel Studios fired Jonathan Majors just hours after his conviction to be charged with assault and harassment in his ex-girlfriend’s case associated their charges Jonathan Majors was facing a similar hammer blow to his career as the next MCU big bad villain after Thanos. The actor had already played multiple Kang variants in Loki seasons 1 and 2, and Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania. His termination presented a monumental storytelling issue for Marvel, as Kang was supposed to be the overarching menace throughout Phases 4, 5 and 6.

A New Overarching Villain Emerges

The consequences of Majors’ termination were much more than the removal of a single actor. Marvel entirely dropped the Kang-centric plotline which had been developing since 2021. The fifth Avengers movie, Avengers: The Kang Dynasty, was renamed Avengers: Doomsday. This was a radical departure from multiversal villainy centered on Kang to dealing with a more “realistic” but just as threatening antagonist.

From The Kang Dynasty to Avengers: Doomsday

Marvel had originally centered the entire Multiverse Saga on Kang after being impressed with Majors’ turn as He Who Remains in Loki. The time-traveling, reality-altering villain’s age made him a perfect choice for a story that would take place across multiple timelines and dimensions. However, it has been reported that Marvel Studios had reservations about Kang and the Multiverse Saga even prior to Majors’ legal troubles, suggesting there were some doubts internally as to the direction.

Robert Downey Jr. Returns as Doctor Doom

In one of the most surprising MCU news of all time, Robert Downey Jr. was confirmed to be returning to the franchise as Victor von Doom/Doctor Doom at San Diego Comic-Con 2024. Downey’s dramatic unmasking of himself onstage during the announcement sent shockwaves through the entertainment industry.

The casting decision is a “daring creative pivot” as the former Iron Man actor now embodies one of Marvel’s most iconic villains. Iron Man 3 director Shane Black predicts this casting will “singlehandedly reignite the entire comic book movie industry”. Black said, “I think he’s going to singlehandedly reinvigorate the entire comic book movie industry with that. At first, it seemed like a cynical move, you know, like “Oh, let’s just go back to the well of the one guy that seems to always save us.” But it’s going to be. It’s going to be great.

The Ripple Effect: Industry and Fan Responses

The entertainment industry has been cautiously optimistic about these seismic shifts. Marvel waited until Majors was convicted to fire him, an act of restraint compared to the industry norm of immediately dismissing actors on the basis of accusations as shared.

A number of MCU alumni have voiced their enthusiasm at Downey’s return, although many were surprised by the news. Jeremy Renner disclosed that he had “no idea” about the casting, and that Downey “said nothing” to his MCU colleagues. Tom Hiddleston described the casting as “remarkable” and “absolutely extraordinary”.

Some fans have complained about the casting, fearful of Doom being given a revised origin that includes Tony Stark.Still, the bar is set extremely high, with a lot of people seeing this as Marvel’s shot at recapturing the magic of the Infinity Saga.

Read More:- James Bond’s Next Era: Amazon Takes the Reins of 007 – Who Will Be the New Bond?

Phase 6 Takes a Drastic New Turn

Doctor Doom will be the main villain of Avengers: Doomsday (2026) and Avengers: Secret Wars (2027). The Russo Brothers, who helmed Infinity War and Endgame, are back to direct both movies. This is a massive deviation from the original Kang-centric narrative, however there are rumors that Marvel might still find a way to finish off the story for Kang via a potential recast.

The changes are not just about swapping out the villain. Marvel is slashing its content output drastically`, with as few as two films a year, rather than up to four in recent years shared by Screenrant. The change is part of a larger Disney strategy to prioritize quality over quantity after some mixed feelings about recent MCU offerings.

A Defining Moment for Marvel’s Future

The Phase 6 overhaul is arguably the most significant plot twist the MCU has ever seen. What was meant to be a multiverse story focused on Kang has now become something else entirely, with Doctor Doom seemingly going to end the Multiverse Saga. Early reviews from the cast are that Downey’s performance as Doom is outstanding, with Vanessa Kirby calling it “some of the most amazing work I’ve seen” in. The success of this recalibration will ultimately dictate the MCU’s future path. With Marvel now proceeding with Avengers: Doomsday in December 2026, the entertainment world wonders if the breathtaking turn of events behind the scenes is going to lead to a resurgence of creativity or become a cautionary tale about the perils of planning franchise far ahead in a volatile world.

Final Thoughts

The Marvel Phase 6 storyline changes entirely and gives everyone a big shock with its new plot. The decision of changing the biggest villain of the Multiverse Saga is tough for Russo Brother but they came back with a surprise casting after Jonathan Majors got fired, Robert Downey Jr. is returned as a villain in Avengers next film Avengers: Doomsday. Marvel entirely dropped the Kang-centric plotline that was supposed to be the overarching menace throughout Phases 4, 5 and 6 and adopt renamed it with Doomsday. 

Comments

View comments and join the discussion

Alpana

Articles Published: 173

Alpana is Fandomfans Senior Editor across all genres of entertainment. She evolved in the media industry since a very long time, she manages the content strategy and editing of all the blogs. Her focus on story development, review analysis, and research is well-equipped that ensures every article meets the standards of accuracy and depth.

View Profile ↗

Mike Flanagan’s The Exorcist: Martyrs Sends Scarlett Johansson After the Devil

Scarlett Johansson stars in Mike Flanagan’s The Exorcist: Martyrs, a new horror film that brings demonic terror and supernatural suspense to the big screen.

Published: Oct 12, 2026, 6:31 AM
Last Updated: Oct 28, 2026, 5:53 AM

Mike Flanagan taking the thriller out-of-the bedroom with The Exorcist: Martyrs, this film is a standalone entry in the series starring Scarlett Johansson who is a single mother and a detective. Universal released a teaser this week and scheduled the full trailer for Friday, October 9, so the first real look is here.

Johansson plays NYPD homicide detective Julie Miller, who catches a serial killer known as Father Sunday, played by John Leguizamo. Julie is a single mother, and her son Max has just turned 12.

The killer’s method explains the film’s title. He recreates the deaths of Catholic saints, turning each murder into a twisted tribute to the martyrs.

The story jumps ahead thirteen years after Julie takes Sunday down, with new murders tied to her past. Her son becomes the target of a demonic force, and Chiwetel Ejiofor plays a priest tied to the investigation. 

The cast is deep. Laurence Fishburne, Diane Lane and Sasha Calle are in, along with a pile of Flanagan regulars: Carla Gugino, Rahul Kohli, Kate Siegel, Samantha Sloyan and more. It’s a Universal and Blumhouse production.

This Is A Crime Procedural With a Demon Problem

Flanagan isn’t hiding the references. He cites Se7en, The Silence of the Lambs and The Exorcist III as influences. His stated goal, per Esquire, was to ask what happens when you merge a serial-killer thriller with what we love about the original. He also says possession moves “out of the bedroom,” away from parental torment.

Scarlett Johansson

The trailer opens with Miller (Scarlett Johansson) investigating the case and the first question she ask:

“How old is he?”

An altar boy from the church who is just sixteen hanging upside down in a bloodied way. Detective removing chains and old ritualistics circular pendant from the body. Miller talk to Father Williams that FBI didn’t start investigating the serial killers until 1970s and says:

“H.H. Homes, America’s first serial killer, said he was possessed by Satan.”

Describing that many serial killers were claimed to be in possession before. One scene shows that the criminal is eliminated by the injections with a look that it’s not his fault while Miller is watching from the outside. At the end of the trailer, She asked the demon not to call her a mom. The story looks horrifying as Miller digs deeper into the case; she may find herself caught in a web that brings her closer to the very person she’s investigating. 

Mike Flanagan’s

Flanagan says the film does have “that one job from the title,” meaning an exorcism is coming. So no one should worry that the procedural framing swallows the genre. The teaser also winks at the original. Coverage noted a glimpse of the famous stairs, and an Alien-style eeriness in the music.

The franchise needs this more than it will admit. The Exorcist: Believer (2023) was meant to launch a new trilogy. It reportedly grossed about $136 million worldwide on a roughly $30 million budget, which fell short of Universal’s hopes after it spent a reported $400 million on the rights. 

Martyrs is not a sequel to Believer. Flanagan says it’s a standalone story with its own characters. That’s a clean reset, and it fits his reputation. He’s the Doctor Sleep and Midnight Mass guy, and he wrote, directed, produced and edited this one himself. His Carrie adaptation also landed on Prime Video this week, so the horror press cycle is all Flanagan right now.

👉   James Gunn Rebuilding DC Universe by Learning From Marvel’s Biggest Mistakes

The Exorcist: Martyrs Bring Different Genre Than Earlier Movies

The smartest thing about The Exorcist: Martyrs is that it skips the Friedkin imitation game and goes after The Exorcist III. That 1990 film, written and directed by William Peter Blatty, is a detective story that happens to be terrifying, and fans have argued for years that it’s the best sequel the series has. A ComicBookMovie commenter even floated the idea that Martyrs could be a secret Exorcist III follow-up. That’s fan speculation, nothing more, but it shows where the audience’s head is.

The Exorcist Martyrs

Johansson also fits the role better than the marketing implies. She does tired, controlled and quietly unnerved well, and a homicide detective with a 12-year-old at home gives her a stake that isn’t “save the possessed girl.”

Serial-killer thrillers and possession horror run on different clocks. One rewards slow deduction, the other rewards escalating dread, and a two-hour movie can end up with two half-built halves. Flanagan’s TV work suggests he can pull off the blend, but a film gives him less room than a series.

 👉  The Sinister Six That Never Was: How a Cyberattack Killed Drew Goddard’s Spider-Man Dream

Conclusion

The Exorcist: Martyrs opens on March 12, 2027. So be ready to enjoy the thriller while teasing your teeth. Horror is something that comes naturally and with the new script, it looks promising.

The movie was inspired by the Se7en, which means don’t expect the original’s family-in-crisis dread story. The genre is shifted with more terrible and bloodier cinema which takes your breath away. The first look is amazing, the next full trailer from Universal will come soon.

Comments

View comments and join the discussion

Alpana

Articles Published: 173

Alpana is Fandomfans Senior Editor across all genres of entertainment. She evolved in the media industry since a very long time, she manages the content strategy and editing of all the blogs. Her focus on story development, review analysis, and research is well-equipped that ensures every article meets the standards of accuracy and depth.

View Profile ↗