Colin Farrell returns to Matt Reeves' Batman universe as the Penguin in The Batman Part II, and shares the dark world of Gotham and his passion storytelling.
Colin Farrell has got us very excited to return to Gotham as The Penguin in The Batman Part II. Far from it being about getting action scenes right, or even stealing the show with the character’s arc. Farrel explained in a chat with Collider that what pulls him back are the people he gets to work with, and the “Matt Reeves immersive world that’s just very, very gritty.” There’s definitely a love for the vibe and the behind the scenes team it feels like. Farrell kept it real, he explained the camaraderie and new ways of working on set keep bringing him back, as he promotes the upcoming movie The Ballad of a Small Player releasing on 29 October 2025.
Colin Farrell delivered so many thoughts on his role in HBO’s massive hit The Penguin. So the experience evidently stuck with him for good. The series its eight-episodes run in late 2024. It garnered rave reviews, high ratings, and mentions for major awards like the Emmys and Golden Globes. Farrell really got to dive deep into the character, all of the intricate layers and psychological twists and turns that you can only explore in a long form series. Apparently the part allowed him to stretch his acting chops quite a bit, and fans seemed to get as much pleasure as he did. With all the buzz around the show, it is no surprise that The Penguin turned out to be one of HBO’s breakout hits.
The show ended up a huge success, attracting 5.3 million viewers across all platforms during its first weekend, marking the largest four-day debut for a tier one Max original since The Last of Us dusted off in January 2023. The show received rave reviews from critics with a 94% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, with many reviews referring to Colin Farrell’s performance as “transformative” and “a true tour de force.”
It’s not so much ‘What do I do with this?, but I just want to be in that world and be with Robert and be with Jeffrey again and be brought by Matt Reeves,’ said Farrell. After a deeper exploration of the HBO series character, Farrell returning to the movie sequel isn’t about further expanding the Penguin’s story, instead rejoining the talented ensemble.
Colin Farrell shared his happiness by saying “I’m really excited to be back in that world, to just be around it,” he said as he contemplated joining such an unparalleled group of creatives once more.
Farrell’s ties to the world of Batman are deeply embedded since he was a kid growing up in Dublin. He shared, he was raised watching Burgess Meredith’s legendary turn as the Penguin in the ‘60s Batman TV series when he was 5, and then Danny DeVito’s iconic performance in Tim Burton’s Batman Returns at around 11 or 12.
For the actor, the joy is a little simpler, just getting to play in a world “where a character called Bruce Wayne and Batman exist, is such a joy.” He admired how Reeves had “re-imagined a world that is unique enough and yet still honors the struggles of that city and the psychological struggles of the character of Bruce Wayne.”
Read More 👉 Gen V Season 2: A Triumphant College Reunion That Sets the Stage for Epic Battles
Although Farrell has now confirmed that his part in The Batman Part II will be very small, a smaller appearance than in the first film. He has read the full script and described it as “extraordinary”. He hinted that THE BATMAN 2 is a much deeper plot, it means that Reeves is expected to be seen in scarier scenes and it will further keep the franchise as the stakes are bigger.
Filming for The Batman Part II is set to begin April 2026. Robert Pattinson, Jeffrey Wright, Andy Serkis and Colin Farrell are returning to their roles. Farrell seems doubtful about a second season of The Penguin. He said to Deadline, “I’ve heard some talk about it, but I don’t know if that’s a good idea. Part of me thinks we should just leave it as we got away with something special.”
For Farrell, being part of Matt Reeves’ Batman world is more than just another gig—it’s a dream come true from his childhood, and he’s surrounded by collaborators who are as passionate as he is about telling grounded, character-driven stories in the dark, complex reality of Gotham. The criminal underworld of Gotham City is once again ready to entertain their fans but Colin Farrell’s Penguin has made a permanent impact on the Batman mythos and his passion for this universe and the team behind it will keep him coming back for as long as they’ll have him.
"Wake Up Dead Man review: Superb performances and a bold storyline, but this Knives Out follow-up lacks the complex twists of the originals." Learn more..!
The late 2025 launch of Wake Up Dead Man: A Knives Out Mystery is a high-stakes moment for one of the greatest IPs in modern moviemaking. Taking its place as the crown jewel amongst writer-director Rian Johnson’s body of work, the Knives Out franchise hasn’t simply breathed new life into the “whodunit” genre, it has transformed it into a tool for sharp social commentary, adapting the warm tropes of Agatha Christie to unpack the unsettling realities of 21st-century American class relations.
Coming off the sleeper theatrical success of Knives Out (2019) and the opulent, streaming-centered cultural moment of Glass Onion (2022), this third entry arrives with the weight of an inherently high-stakes legacy and the burdensome $450 million payday by Netflix.
Although the film has received overwhelmingly positive ratings—for example, it currently has a Rotten Tomatoes rating of 96% to 100% in the wake of its premiere at the Toronto International Film Festival—a close read of the reviews reveals a series struggling to find new energy in its satirical bite and its narrative mechanics.
The biggest departure in Wake Up Dead Man and the cause of most critical dissent is its bold structure. Johnson seeks to destabilize the standard whodunit paradigm not in the question of who did it, but in the mode of storytelling.
Everything has been turned on its head in what is being called a “subversive” and “harmful” marketing move: The franchise centerpiece, Benoit Blanc (Daniel Craig), does not show up until the 45-minute mark. This decision in narrative style changes the whole DNA of the whodunit.
The movie devotes its whole first act to introducing the “victim,” Monsignor Jefferson Wicks (Josh Brolin), and the main protagonist/suspect, Father Jud Duplenticy (Josh O’Connor). The viewer is so deeply ensconced in the personalities of the Chimney Rock group, the history of the church and even the philosophical divide between Jud and Wicks that the arrival of law enforcement feels intrusive. The point of this construction is to give the mystery an emotional charge — the murder is not simply a brainteaser, but a tragedy involving characters the audience has come to know.
Reviewers said the first two reels of the film are slow. By the time the detective, Blanc, finally makes his appearance, most of the puzzles are already set on the table, so he’s not quite as active and important as he was in previous entries. He’s more like a “buddy cop” partner to Father Jud than the main engine of the narrative.
With Blanc arriving so late, the first act becomes a drama — nicely acted, but lacking the strong mystery “hook” that normally pulls audience in. That’s why they thought it was “far too long” to get truly started.
The movie borrows from a classic play, “the locked room” mystery, in which a murder takes place inside a church during a service and only the congregants could be suspects. The premise is entertaining — a seemingly impossible murder with no weapon or assailant in sight, inspired by old-school authors like John Dickson Carr.
Reviewers enjoyed the classic Christie-style tone, but many thought the answer was both a little too complex and still too easy to guess. Since the killer could be identified by the audience rather early on, the mystery was not very surprising and some considered the film to have lost the unpredictable energy that made the previous Knives Out films so exciting.
The film’s primary antagonist Monsignor Wicks is a gaunt, terrorized priest who wields religion as a tool of oppression, placing him among the more blatant political extremism and faith abuse in the stacked deck of the film. The movie even sets him up against the gentler Father Jud to illustrate the difference between poisonous institutions and real spirituality. But many reviewers found the satire too on the nose and “safe.”
The portrayal of Wicks is made so blatantly villainous that the satire feels toothless and uninspired, especially when compared to the cutting, dangerous satire of the earlier Knives Out films. It makes the criticism feel routine and less hard-hitting.
Read More 👉 An Exhaustive Strategic and Narrative Analysis of Eva Green’s Casting in Wednesday Season 3
Reviews say the movie is bigger than Knives Out but not as sharp as Glass Onion, and many feel it doesn’t have the tight, focused writing of the first film. It also plays it safe, leaning on well-worn mystery tropes rather than attempting to surprise or outsmart its audience.
Although the storyline can appear to be baffling at the beginning, the twists are quite predictable, which causes the mystery to be foreseeable and less emotional. Without a clever, mind blowing reveal, the ending just feels mundane.
Wake Up Dead Man is a “safe” triumph—a film that refines the form but loses the anarchic, punk-rock energy that made Knives Out a sensation. It’s a mystery that insists on being watched for its craft, if not one that will be viewed again and again as its antecedents have been.
Moving forward with the franchise, Johnson has a choice— he can continue his journey toward introspection and “cinema,” or he can come back to the tight, aggressive storytelling that made the original a searing experience. The “Knives” may still be out, but this time, they seem a little less sharp.
Fandomfans is an entertainment source which delivers consistently every movie reviews analysis and audience reception for a Wake Up Dead Man movie.
Tron: Ares' box office flop stuns Hollywood. Learn why Jared Leto's passion project failed, its $33 million debut, and how it changed his career forever.
The November 2025 release of Disney’s long-awaited sequel, Tron: Ares, fizzled at the box office after a gross that trade observers called a disaster and an “IP-killing event”. The Joachim Rønning directed film made a lackluster domestic debut of $33.2 million to $33.5 million, well below its estimated opening gross by $10 million or more. The opening fell just shy of $60 million worldwide, ranging from $60.2 million to $60.5 million.
Ares not hitting the $100m mark in its opening weekend against its sizable budget made for an early and likely impossible-to-recover-from financial loss for Disney. With the failure, Report said that it is very likely that Disney will “retire the franchise from the big screen” for the foreseeable future, signaling to investors a continued reluctance to finance risky.
The box office doom of Tron: Ares, according to MovieWeb, once again raised and intensified doubts about Jared Leto’s bankability as a star who could anchor a major studio tentpole. The seeds for this industry skepticism were planted three years earlier with the collapse of Sony’s Morbius (2022).
This recurring pattern of financial failure has consolidated a trade consensus that sees Leto as an actor who can’t reliably bring in box office for similar big Intellectual Property (IP) tentpole projects. Industry reports have indicated that “the big paydays Leto received for Ares might well be over,” as studios are increasingly shying away from the actor as a dependable male star draw.
In today’s Hollywood, star viability is inexorably linked to public perception and promotability, more so for those who headline massive franchises for corporations like Disney. Leto also has considerable baggage, including several sexual misconduct allegations (which his representatives deny) that surfaced just prior to the Tron: Ares press cycle.
The allegations posed significant challenges for Disney’s marketing team, with industry executives wondering how the actor could “shoulder the pressure of selling two theatrical movies while dancing around the damning claims”. The controversies had an immediate effect on possible promotional opportunities, creating uncertainty as to whether prominent media outlets would allow him to participate in the usual press routines to help market a blockbuster, making him a major-risk.
Industry peers is also pointed out his self-serving spectacle and unprofessional distraction after his extreme behavior on set including mailing eccentric gifts to Suicide Squad co-stars or walking around on crutches for Morbius. The perceived expense of working with the actor’s process wasn’t anymore worth the result. This professional reputation of being a “pain in the ass” who wastes time, combined with his inability to open wide films makes him a uniquely risky bet for studios that want to run-efficient production and clean PR.
According to People, The flop of Tron: Ares is far more than a box office number, it’s the shattering of an actor’s sincere passion against the cold, hard financial calculations of contemporary Hollywood. For years, Jared Leto was spearheading the movie, leveraging his celebrity and producer credit, dating back to 2017, to bring Disney’s long-dormant sci-fi franchise out of development purgatory. His commitment was authentic; he was a fan of the original film and its tech, and playing the digital warrior Ares was a very personal goal for him.
Read More 👉 Kiss of the Spider Woman (2025): A Dazzling Tale of Love Create a Buzz
The broad consensus in the business is that Leto’s way out is would be to turn on a dime and not be the lead vehicle for a big-budget franchise movie. The most obvious sign of that strategic recalibration: his next role is as Skeletor in Amazon MGM’s Masters of the Universe.
Reports say, This casting is generally regarded as a potential career booster for the actor. Adopting the role of the main villain, Leto once again places the financial weight solely on the IP and the hero, enabling him to focus on crafting a memorable performance. The campy villainous role of Skeletor is a dream role for Leto, and one that lends itself perfectly to his style of transformative acting where he utilises heavy makeup and theatricality (see House of Gucci). How well this transition works will depend on his ability to strike the right balance of “menace and camp,” and keep critics away from dismissing the performance as too silly, a perception that has dogged both his Paolo Gucci and Joker performances.
Leto and his team’s main professional challenge is to manage the promotional risk. Any future promotions around the film will have to strategically separate the actor from the success of the project, downplaying those risky stunts or conversations about method acting that come from set, and instead just talk about the character and the spectacle of the film. The twin flop of Morbius and Tron: Ares have cemented that Jared Leto is simply no longer considered bankable enough to weather the scrutiny and controversy that comes with carrying a mega-budget franchise.
