Caught Stealing is the sleeper in Darren Aronofsky's output, and it includes Austin Butler's best career performance in this exhilarating 1998 NYC narrative.
If you checked the box office rankings in August 2025, you might have thought Caught Stealing was a bomb. It came, it saw, it didn’t come close to recouping even a quarter of its budget. That’s a flop in the cold calculations of Hollywood. But if you dig movies that actually mean something, you already know that box office numbers are never an indicator of quality.
Caught Stealing is a terrific film that was just released at the wrong time. It is a gritty, sweaty, adrenaline-charged tour of 1998 New York City, and it may be the most fun film Aronofsky has ever made. So as it finally comes to streaming, here’s hoping this misunderstood classic can find a wider audience.
Darren Aronofsky is generally known for his brutal misery. From the drug-fueled nightmares of Requiem for a Dream to the pornographic claustrophobia of The Whale, his movies are usually predicated on a formula of obsession triggering madness. You respect his films, but you don’t always “enjoy” them.
Stealing Caught steals the script and flips the script sideways. It’s Aronofsky loosening his tie. He brings his trademark intensity to a crime thriller that seems like a mash-up of Coen Brothers capers and a 90’s action flick. He’s no longer “wallowing” in his character’s pain; he’s feeling the chaos, literally. The upshot is a movie whose balance of excruciating suspense and farcical comedy achieves a tone that’s idiosyncratically, strangely electric.
Forget the hip-swivel of Elvis and the bald menace of Dune. According to Screenrant, In Caught Stealing, Austin Butler completely reinvents his physical presence. He plays Hank Thompson, a washed-up baseball prodigy turned alcoholic bartender.
To promote the part, Butler had to abandon the dehydrated “superhero abs” look for what the production termed the “Baseball Body.” He bulked up with 35 pounds to resemble a ‘90s power hitter — big, heavy and utilitarian. When Hank fights, he does not do karate but he draws on centrifugal force, wielding mundane objects like a bat, looking like a dashing person with the body mass of a football player. It’s a grounded, sweaty turn that brings gravity to the movie. You buy that he’s a guy who’s given up on life, which is what makes it so interesting when he has to fight for it.
Read More 👉 Avatar: Fire and Ash World Premiere Introduces a Darker, Unpredictable Pandora
One of the film’s smartest moves is its setting. By placing the action in 1998, Aronofsky removes the safety net of modern technology. There are no smartphones to GPS a getaway route. There is no cloud to upload evidence to. Hank is alone in the Lower East Side with nothing but payphones, paper maps, and his wits.
This “analog anxiety” imparts a breathless, hands-on energy to the film that so many modern thrillers are missing. It’s a “run and gun” movie powered by a pounding post-punk score that will make your heart race. The camerawork captures the filth of a non-gentrified New York, a city of dilapidated infrastructure and menacing shadows.
The story is straight-up noir, Hank is just an ordinary guy who winds up in the criminal underbelly simply because he agreed to watch his neighbor’s cat. That’s it. That’s the catalyst.
Suddenly he’s being chased by Russian mobsters, a terrifying corrupt cop (Regina King), and a wild card enforcer (Bad Bunny). It’s a “bureaucratic nightmare” of violence in which everyone believes Hank has the MacGuffin, and no one thinks he’s innocent.
With an 84% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, the critics have already determined what the general movie-going audience failed to see in theaters. Caught Stealing isn’t just a movie, it’s a mood. It’s a throwback to an era when action films had texture, when heroes were humble folk enduring a genuinely awful day, and survival wasn’t about saving the world — it was just about making it to the next morning.
Caught Stealing is the sort of movie that sneaks up on you – sharp, frenetic, bruised in both tone and spirit, and infused with a style we had no idea Aronofsky was capable of. It may have been a box office flop, but it’s a matter of time. With its gritty ‘98 vibe, an amazing career-best performance from Austin Butler, and a tone that is at once both panicked and infuriatingly funny, this movie is going to find a cult audience once the word gets out about what they missed in theaters. There are times when the loudest success stories aren’t the best films – but the ones that live with you the longest, after the lights come up.
Fandomfans bring you creative and engaging breakdowns of the movies and shows that you should watch.
Weapons Redefines Modern Horror brings a fresh wave to modern horror with methodical tension, psychological depth and bold storytelling mastery.
Zach Cregger’s Weapons Redefines Modern Horror, writer-director of the excellent first solo feature The Package, proves himself once again with Weapons in that it is one essential element that separates this film from the majority of horror movies and that is methodical, merciless dread building leading up to the shock moment. The critical consensus largely agrees that none of the film’s intensity is down to any cheap, jarring jump scares, but rather lies in the bravura skill of maintaining such high levels of tension for so long – a style that packs a real punch on screen.
Zach Cregger’s Weapons Redefines Modern Horror ability to slowly ratchet up tension has garnered him much acclaim. It’s psychological manipulation by way of infrastructure, rather than merely a stylistic maneuver. The jump scare, a device that’s often dismissed as cliche, is intentionally employed in Weapons. A “release of all the tension that has been ratcheted up to this point” is how analysis characterises shock, which is experienced as an earned narrative climax and not a cheap jolt. This careful timing makes the scare seem inevitable, thematically significant, and according to him forever tied to the technique of building up tension.
The film’s critical acclaim becoming evident in its high scores including a 96% rating from the critics on Rotten Tomatoes is naturally associated with the way such a cliché like the jump scare has been converted into an intellectual and emotional climax. The shock is completely justified because you need a long, often five-minute buildup before the scare, and that builds its thematic punch way beyond its passing visceral wallop.
Weapons owes much of its place in the vanguard of contemporary genre criticism to this method. This is a wildly satisfying antidote to the last 10 years of horror movies about grief and trauma, critics have lauded. Cregger channels the genre toward an externalized terror that is viscerally immediate and relevant in today’s world by focusing its horror apparatus on urgent, collective, and existential thematic drama, as opposed to simply resting on metaphorical grief.
Zach Cregger’s Weapons Redefines Modern Horror buildup is a deliberate act of mind games, using tools meant to train the audience to expect something non-stop. The director takes advantage of multiple fakeouts before the real scares, which are described as the warm up.
Zach Cregger’s Weapons Redefines Modern Horror, in particular, parallels the characters’ emotional vulnerability with this physical immersion. The camerawork emphasizes the isolation and paranoia of Justine. Following a harrowing and emotional monologue in which he is sorry for his failings as a dad, Archer then gets a jump scare. In this way, the camera work upholds the movie as a cerebral, meticulously rendered drama in which technical fear serves thematic purposes by mutating the shock of a conventional fright into a highly personal violation of an aspect of the character’s internal struggle.
The horror works because it stems from a mass psychological unraveling, which also offers an explanation for the movie’s endless sense of dread. Cregger’s eye is on the resulting disintegration and decay of the social order, how the town breaks apart and goes on witch hunts against suspects, including the teacher Justine Gandy. The complete isolation endured by Justine, with no community to back her up, offers a powerful exemplification of the film’s main thesis: isolation can drive people mad, and the communal response to trauma is where a second round of horror arises.
By frequently changing perspectives and depicting the menace as having an impact on several, diverse individuals, Cregger maintains the audience’s engagement with the trauma experienced by the town as a whole, allowing tension to be drawn out during the length of the movie. Terror is thus understood as a society-wide infectious disease, which is far more disconcerting than a regional monster.
The origin of the supernatural horror is none other than Aunt Gladys (Amy Madigan), who orchestrates the weaponization of the children. Amy Madigan’s performance has garnered critical acclaim, with some critics lobbying for award recognition. That’s partly because her performance is so effective that the villain isn’t just a monster, but a searing, shockingly tangible instrument for psychological torment.
Read More:- What Brings Colin Farrell Back to Matt Reeves’ Batman Universe
Domestic terror Weapons gets an even better kind of shock because Zach Cregger purposefully creates and maintains an intense sense of dread until he wields the jump scare like a precision instrument. The film’s scare factor is born of its method, not its madness.
Weapons confirms Zach Cregger’s Weapons Redefines Modern Horror as a powerhouse voice in horror whose brilliance comes from his dedication to inserting deeply emotional relationships into terrifying survival and mystery narratives that makes the genre feel both immediate and intelligent. The film’s strong business and critical success, as a big-budget, original outing by a major studio, demonstrates that this intellectual, meticulously paced brand of horror is not only sustainable, but perhaps a major new template for top-notch, high-budget event horror pics going forward.
undertone Review: A24’s chilling psychological horror turns silence, family, and familiarity into fear, resulting in one of the studio’s most unsettling films.
The majority of us thought the lockdown years were pretty exhausting, but director Ian Tuason made that isolation a nightmare—the good kind. His new film, Undertone, is currently the buzz at Sundance, and it’s easy to understand why. It’s a scary, sound-centered psychological horror that came from real-life anxiety and a house that could possibly be haunted now.
We’ve all been there—crashing at your parents’ place is not whatever you’re picturing it’s going to be. But for Tuason, it was a necessity so he could tend to his ailing parents.
In an interview with Variety, he shared his experiences of where he got the idea. While he was there, he began to consider what makes us feel safe —and what happens when you flip that on its head. The Exorcist concept (taking a “safe” daughter and making her scary) and applied it to his own life.
“My mind is stuck on ‘The Exorcist’, how it scared me so much when I was a kid.”
–He said
He wondered, What if my mom, who relies on me, starts speaking in a different voice? That dark thought transformed a simple podcast script into a feature film. He even shot it in his parents’ house to save money, but it came at a price. Living on your own horror set meant he never felt truly alone, and he said the house began feeling “haunted” well after the cameras stopped rolling.
Undertone is distinguished by its sound. The lead, Evy, is the host of a podcast, and the film plays with your ears. Tuason engineered the sound as if you are wearing noise-cancelling headphones.
“Do you know that weird silence level where you have no clue what’s happening in the room behind you?”
–He said
That’s precisely what he employs to frighten you. The film oddballed the sounds that Evy hears on her tapes and the sounds that are really in her hallway.
The hype around Undertone is deafening and it seems like the biggest names in horror are officially placing their bets on Tuason. That’s just the beginning: A24 has already acquired the film and scheduled a March 13 release.
The legends behind Blumhouse and Atomic Monster (the producers of Insidious and The Conjuring) are the ones who brought in Tuason to give the Paranormal Activity franchise a revamp. It’s a complete full circle moment for a guy who started out recording spooky noises in his childhood bedroom. If he can make a DIY movie at his parents’ house this scary, then we can’t wait to see what he does with a Hollywood budget and the keys to one of the biggest horror series in history.
Read More:- Lyonel Baratheon and Tyrion Lannister: How Westeros Repeats the Same Character
Undertone confirms the greatest horror has never been monsters or jump scares—it’s familiarity. By weaponizing a childhood home, a parent’s voice, and silence itself, Ian Tuason crafts a deeply personal and unsettling journey. Its choreography of sound is so perfect that it’s a movie to watch with headphones, each whisper feeling invasive and intimate.
With Sundance buzz, an A24 release, and major horror studios lining up to back Tuason’s next project, Undertone is not just a powerful first feature—it’s the introduction of a filmmaker who gets that the real horror is right at home.
With Fandomfans, you can find all the latest details and behind the scenes of movies and series.
